[Search & Destroy]

Many of the "no-go" zones function as microstates governed by Islamic Sharia law. Host-country authorities effectively have lost control in these areas and in many instances are unable to provide even basic public aid such as police, fire fighting and ambulance services.

The "no-go" areas are the by-product of decades of multicultural policies that have encouraged Muslim immigrants to create parallel societies and remain segregated rather than become integrated into their European host nations.

In Britain, for example, a Muslim group called Muslims Against the Crusades has launched a campaign to turn twelve British cities – including what it calls "Londonistan" – into independent Islamic states. The so-called Islamic Emirates would function as autonomous enclaves ruled by Islamic Sharia law and operate entirely outside British jurisprudence.

The Islamic Emirates Project names the British cities of Birmingham, Bradford, Derby, Dewsbury, Leeds, Leicester, Liverpool, Luton, Manchester, Sheffield, as well as Waltham Forest in northeast London and Tower Hamlets in East London as territories to be targeted for blanket Sharia rule.

In the Tower Hamlets area of East London (also known as the Islamic Republic of Tower Hamlets), for example, extremist Muslim preachers, called the Tower Hamlets Taliban, regularly issue death threats to women who refuse to wear Islamic veils. Neighborhood streets have been plastered with posters declaring "You are entering a Sharia controlled zone: Islamic rules enforced." And street advertising deemed offensive to Muslims is regularly vandalized or blacked out with spray paint.

In the Bury Park area of Luton, Muslims have been accused of "ethnic cleansing" by harassing non-Muslims to the point that many of them move out of Muslim neighborhoods. In the West Midlands, two Christian preachers have been accused of "hate crimes" for handing out gospel leaflets in a predominantly Muslim area of Birmingham. In Leytonstone in east London, the Muslim extremist Abu Izzadeen heckled the former Home Secretary John Reid by saying: "How dare you come to a Muslim area."

In France, large swaths of Muslim neighborhoods are now considered "no-go" zones by French police. At last count, there are 751 Sensitive Urban Zones (Zones Urbaines Sensibles, ZUS), as they are euphemistically called. A complete list of the ZUS can be found on a French government website, complete with satellite maps and precise street demarcations. An estimated 5 million Muslims live in the ZUS, parts of France over which the French state has lost control.

Muslim immigrants are taking control of other parts of France too. In Paris and other French cities with high Muslim populations, such as Lyons, Marseilles and Toulouse, thousands of Muslims are closing off streets and sidewalks (and by extension, are closing down local businesses and trapping non-Muslim residents in their homes and offices) to accommodate overflowing crowds for Friday prayers. Some mosques have also begun broadcasting sermons and chants of "Allahu Akbar" via loudspeakers into the streets.

The weekly spectacles, which have been documented by dozens of videos posted on Youtube.com (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here), and which have been denounced as an "occupation without tanks or soldiers," have provoked anger and disbelief. But despite many public complaints, local authorities have declined to intervene because they are afraid of sparking riots.

In the Belgian capital of Brussels (which is 20% Muslim), several immigrant neighborhoods have become "no-go" zones for police officers, who frequently are pelted with rocks by Muslim youth. In the Kuregem district of Brussels, which often resembles an urban war zone, police are forced to patrol the area with two police cars: one car to carry out the patrols and another car to prevent the first car from being attacked. In the Molenbeek district of Brussels, police have been ordered not to drink coffee or eat a sandwich in public during the Islamic month of Ramadan.

In Germany, Chief Police Commissioner Bernhard Witthaut, in an August 1 interview with the newspaper Der Westen, revealed that Muslim immigrants are imposing "no-go" zones in cities across Germany at an alarming rate.

The interviewer asked Witthaut: "Are there urban areas – for example in the Ruhr – districts and housing blocks that are "no-go areas," meaning that they can no longer be secured by the police?" Witthaut replied: "Every police commissioner and interior minister will deny it. But of course we know where we can go with the police car and where, even initially, only with the personnel carrier. The reason is that our colleagues can no longer feel safe there in twos, and have to fear becoming the victim of a crime themselves. We know that these areas exist. Even worse: in these areas crimes no longer result in charges. They are left 'to themselves.' Only in the worst cases do we in the police learn anything about it. The power of the state is completely out of the picture."

In Italy, Muslims have been commandeering the Piazza Venezia in Rome for public prayers. In Bologna, Muslims repeatedly have threatened to bomb the San Petronio cathedral because it contains a 600-year-old fresco inspired by Dante's Inferno which depicts Mohammed being tormented in hell.

In the Netherlands, a Dutch court ordered the government to release to the public a politically incorrect list of 40 "no-go" zones in Holland. The top five Muslim problem neighborhoods are in Amsterdam, Rotterdam and Utrecht. The Kolenkit area in Amsterdam is the number one Muslim "problem district" in the country. The next three districts are in Rotterdam – Pendrecht, het Oude Noorden and Bloemhof. The Ondiep district in Utrecht is in the fifth position, followed by Rivierenwijk (Deventer), Spangen (Rotterdam), Oude Westen (Rotterdam), Heechterp/ Schieringen (Leeuwarden) and Noord-Oost (Maastricht).

In Sweden, which has some of the most liberal immigration laws in Europe, large swaths of the southern city of Malmö – which is more than 25% Muslim – are "no-go" zones for non-Muslims. Fire and emergency workers, for example, refuse to enter Malmö's mostly Muslim Rosengaard district without police escorts. The male unemployment rate in Rosengaard is estimated to be above 80%. When fire fighters attempted to put out a fire at Malmö's main mosque, they were attacked by stone throwers.

In the Swedish city of Gothenburg, Muslim youth have been hurling petrol bombs at police cars. In the city's Angered district, where more than 15 police cars have been destroyed, teenagers have also been pointing green lasers at the eyes of police officers, some of whom have been temporarily blinded.

In Gothenburg's Backa district, youth have been throwing stones at patrolling officers. Gothenburg police have also been struggling to deal with the problem of Muslim teenagers burning cars and attacking emergency services in several areas of the city.

According to the Malmö-based Imam Adly Abu Hajar: "Sweden is the best Islamic state."

[mr. smith]

Quiet day today then?

[bman]

I see it's an article first written in 2011 (good copy and paste). It's no less nonsense now than it was then.

[Westbars Spireite]

How much of that is fact and how much is made up?

[Mr Mercury]

Westbars Spireite, on 14 September 2014 - 04:46 PM, said:

How much of that is fact and how much is made up?

I'm going to hazard a guess that a lot more of that is true, if not in the exact circumstance, but in very similar stories, than many of us dare believe , or indeed admit.

[Misnomer]

bman, on 14 September 2014 - 04:23 PM, said:

I see it's an article first written in 2011 (good copy and paste). It's no less nonsense now than it was then.

Care to elaborate on your own ethnicity and religion? All I have read from you on this board is related to the defending of muslims, including that pathetic attempt to explain that 'not all' the abused girls in Rotherham were white; even though 99% of them were.

[bman]

White atheist.

You misread that other post also. I was trying to say that the misconception of white girls being 'fair game' was not helpful because it allows people like search and destroy to claim that Muslims are targeting 'our' children and peddle more of his divisive rubbish. Sex offenders are sex offenders.

Edit: I'm also not keen on the 'pathetic' comment on the basis that I'd taken the time to read the part of the report dealing with ethnicity. Unlike plenty of others who appeared on here beating their chests.

This post has been edited by bman: 14 September 2014 - 05:09 PM

[Misnomer]

bman, on 14 September 2014 - 05:02 PM, said:

White atheist.

You misread that other post also. I was trying to say that the misconception of white girls being 'fair game' was not helpful because it allows people like search and destroy to claim that Muslims are targeting 'our' children and peddle more of his divisive rubbish. Sex offenders are sex offenders.

Edit: I'm also not keen on the 'pathetic' comment on the basis that I'd taken the time to read the part of the report dealing with ethnicity. Unlike plenty of others who appeared on here beating their chests.

But they (muslims) are, and, have been targeting young white girls for decades, on a national scale. They are seen as 'fair game' and 'easy'; this has been openly discussed, on camera, by Pakistani men.

[Misnomer]

bman, on 14 September 2014 - 05:02 PM, said:

White atheist.

You misread that other post also. I was trying to say that the misconception of white girls being 'fair game' was not helpful because it allows people like search and destroy to claim that Muslims are targeting 'our' children and peddle more of his divisive rubbish. Sex offenders are sex offenders.

Edit: I'm also not keen on the 'pathetic' comment on the basis that I'd taken the time to read the part of the report dealing with ethnicity. Unlike plenty of others who appeared on here beating their chests.

If you see this (Rotherham) as purely paedophile criminality, rather than racist paedophilia, then you have, in my opinion, a very strange view (the antithesis of beating one's chest).

[fishini]

bman, on 14 September 2014 - 05:02 PM, said:

White atheist.

You misread that other post also. I was trying to say that the misconception of white girls being 'fair game' was not helpful because it allows people like search and destroy to claim that Muslims are targeting 'our' children and peddle more of his divisive rubbish. Sex offenders are sex offenders.

Edit: I'm also not keen on the 'pathetic' comment on the basis that I'd taken the time to read the part of the report dealing with ethnicity. Unlike plenty of others who appeared on here beating their chests.

True child sex offenders are offenders regardless of colour or creed. That said please do not insult our intelligence trying to convince us that the Muslim child sex offenders do not discriminate between which girls to abuse. It is plainly obvious that they are targeting white girls and to try saying anything else I find offensive. Please take your divisive defense of the Muslim perpetrators to another board they are not welcome here

[bman]

Misnomer, on 14 September 2014 - 05:17 PM, said:

If you see this (Rotherham) as purely paedophile criminality, rather than racist paedophilia, then you have, in my opinion, a very strange view (the antithesis of beating one's chest).

Sorry, my last post wasn't very well thought-out. In Rotherham, there is clearly a problem with groups of Asian men. I don't think I ever denied this, or didn't mean to anyway - I just hate the way that people like Britain First seem to literally wet themselves with excitement about the prospect of spreading more bile. In addition, there is also a problem with child abuse and sexual exploitation within that community (as the report says). That clearly isn't racism, but people choose to ignore that aspect. I don't know what the incidence of child abuse is within the Asian community relative to the rest of the UK, but I'd be surprised if it's higher than the general population. In fact, according to the Catholic Church, child abuse is more prevalent among priests than the general population but you don't see the same level of hatred aimed at 'priests' as you do at 'Muslims'.

This post has been edited by bman: 14 September 2014 - 05:34 PM

[Search & Destroy]

bman, on 14 September 2014 - 05:33 PM, said:

Sorry, my last post wasn't very well thought-out. In Rotherham, there is clearly a problem with groups of Asian men. I don't think I ever denied this, or didn't mean to anyway - I just hate the way that people like Britain First seem to literally wet themselves with excitement about the prospect of spreading more bile. In addition, there is also a problem with child abuse and sexual exploitation within that community (as the report says). That clearly isn't racism, but people choose to ignore that aspect. I don't know what the incidence of child abuse is within the Asian community relative to the rest of the UK, but I'd be surprised if it's higher than the general population. In fact, according to the Catholic Church, child abuse is more prevalent among priests than the general population but you don't see the same level of hatred aimed at 'priests' as you do at 'Muslims'.

Ok, for clarity, tell me if I've got this right.

You believe this Pakistani abuse ring were NOT targeting white girls, you believe they WERE also abusing Muslim girls?

[bman]

Search and Destroy, on 14 September 2014 - 06:44 PM, said:

Ok, for clarity, tell me if I've got this right.

You believe this Pakistani abuse ring were NOT targeting white girls, you believe they WERE also abusing Muslim girls?

Not quite. I think they were targeting vulnerable young girls, many of whom were white and a number of whom were also Asian - the key is that they were vulnerable. The language is revealing: if this was a report on the police breaking up a regular paedophile ring, it wouldn't be prefaced with 'white'.

Anyway, perhaps we should get back to the topic of your 2011 article.

[shaun1866]

bman, on 14 September 2014 - 07:56 PM, said:

Not quite. I think they were targeting vulnerable young girls, many of whom were white and a number of whom were also Asian - the key is that they were vulnerable. The language is revealing: if this was a report on the police breaking up a regular paedophile ring, it wouldn't be prefaced with 'white'.

Anyway, perhaps we should get back to the topic of your 2011 article.

People are ignoring the fact that it will happen everywhere black blue pink or white, what's in question is why for all these years it was covered up to the point of even harbouring the dirty b*sta*ds by the powers that be in high places because there dirty b*sta*ds were Asian.

[Search & Destroy]

bman, on 14 September 2014 - 07:56 PM, said:

Not quite. I think they were targeting vulnerable young girls, many of whom were white and a number of whom were also Asian - the key is that they were vulnerable. The language is revealing: if this was a report on the police breaking up a regular paedophile ring, it wouldn't be prefaced with 'white'.

Anyway, perhaps we should get back to the topic of your 2011 article.

You've read the report, how many of the the 1400 were Muslim?

White girls are targeted because they are seen as worthless.

This was in the Mirror

Teenage girls raped in the Rotherham child sex abuse scandal gave birth to more than 100 babies.

Scores more children as young as 13 ­miscarried or were forced to have abortions after attacks by Asian gangs on 1,400 girls.

One victim, who got ­pregnant TWICE to the same attacker, said: “I was groomed and abused, but the police took no action.”

The vulnerable youngster had an abortion at just 14 when her abuser threatened to have her killed if she gave birth to his baby.

Then he made her pregnant again just six months later – and allowed her to keep her child, but only if she became a Muslim.


I think the last paragraph is the relevant one.

This post has been edited by Search and Destroy: 14 September 2014 - 08:36 PM

[bman]

The part that I read didn't say how many.

[Halcyon]

Millwall not on the list then?

[calvin plummers socks]

Search and Destroy, on 14 September 2014 - 02:47 PM, said:

Many of the "no-go" zones function as microstates governed by Islamic Sharia law. Host-country authorities effectively have lost control in these areas and in many instances are unable to provide even basic public aid such as police, fire fighting and ambulance services.

The "no-go" areas are the by-product of decades of multicultural policies that have encouraged Muslim immigrants to create parallel societies and remain segregated rather than become integrated into their European host nations.

In Britain, for example, a Muslim group called Muslims Against the Crusades has launched a campaign to turn twelve British cities – including what it calls "Londonistan" – into independent Islamic states. The so-called Islamic Emirates would function as autonomous enclaves ruled by Islamic Sharia law and operate entirely outside British jurisprudence.

The Islamic Emirates Project names the British cities of Birmingham, Bradford, Derby, Dewsbury, Leeds, Leicester, Liverpool, Luton, Manchester, Sheffield, as well as Waltham Forest in northeast London and Tower Hamlets in East London as territories to be targeted for blanket Sharia rule.

In the Tower Hamlets area of East London (also known as the Islamic Republic of Tower Hamlets), for example, extremist Muslim preachers, called the Tower Hamlets Taliban, regularly issue death threats to women who refuse to wear Islamic veils. Neighborhood streets have been plastered with posters declaring "You are entering a Sharia controlled zone: Islamic rules enforced." And street advertising deemed offensive to Muslims is regularly vandalized or blacked out with spray paint.

In the Bury Park area of Luton, Muslims have been accused of "ethnic cleansing" by harassing non-Muslims to the point that many of them move out of Muslim neighborhoods. In the West Midlands, two Christian preachers have been accused of "hate crimes" for handing out gospel leaflets in a predominantly Muslim area of Birmingham. In Leytonstone in east London, the Muslim extremist Abu Izzadeen heckled the former Home Secretary John Reid by saying: "How dare you come to a Muslim area."

In France, large swaths of Muslim neighborhoods are now considered "no-go" zones by French police. At last count, there are 751 Sensitive Urban Zones (Zones Urbaines Sensibles, ZUS), as they are euphemistically called. A complete list of the ZUS can be found on a French government website, complete with satellite maps and precise street demarcations. An estimated 5 million Muslims live in the ZUS, parts of France over which the French state has lost control.

Muslim immigrants are taking control of other parts of France too. In Paris and other French cities with high Muslim populations, such as Lyons, Marseilles and Toulouse, thousands of Muslims are closing off streets and sidewalks (and by extension, are closing down local businesses and trapping non-Muslim residents in their homes and offices) to accommodate overflowing crowds for Friday prayers. Some mosques have also begun broadcasting sermons and chants of "Allahu Akbar" via loudspeakers into the streets.

The weekly spectacles, which have been documented by dozens of videos posted on Youtube.com (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here), and which have been denounced as an "occupation without tanks or soldiers," have provoked anger and disbelief. But despite many public complaints, local authorities have declined to intervene because they are afraid of sparking riots.

In the Belgian capital of Brussels (which is 20% Muslim), several immigrant neighborhoods have become "no-go" zones for police officers, who frequently are pelted with rocks by Muslim youth. In the Kuregem district of Brussels, which often resembles an urban war zone, police are forced to patrol the area with two police cars: one car to carry out the patrols and another car to prevent the first car from being attacked. In the Molenbeek district of Brussels, police have been ordered not to drink coffee or eat a sandwich in public during the Islamic month of Ramadan.

In Germany, Chief Police Commissioner Bernhard Witthaut, in an August 1 interview with the newspaper Der Westen, revealed that Muslim immigrants are imposing "no-go" zones in cities across Germany at an alarming rate.

The interviewer asked Witthaut: "Are there urban areas – for example in the Ruhr – districts and housing blocks that are "no-go areas," meaning that they can no longer be secured by the police?" Witthaut replied: "Every police commissioner and interior minister will deny it. But of course we know where we can go with the police car and where, even initially, only with the personnel carrier. The reason is that our colleagues can no longer feel safe there in twos, and have to fear becoming the victim of a crime themselves. We know that these areas exist. Even worse: in these areas crimes no longer result in charges. They are left 'to themselves.' Only in the worst cases do we in the police learn anything about it. The power of the state is completely out of the picture."

In Italy, Muslims have been commandeering the Piazza Venezia in Rome for public prayers. In Bologna, Muslims repeatedly have threatened to bomb the San Petronio cathedral because it contains a 600-year-old fresco inspired by Dante's Inferno which depicts Mohammed being tormented in hell.

In the Netherlands, a Dutch court ordered the government to release to the public a politically incorrect list of 40 "no-go" zones in Holland. The top five Muslim problem neighborhoods are in Amsterdam, Rotterdam and Utrecht. The Kolenkit area in Amsterdam is the number one Muslim "problem district" in the country. The next three districts are in Rotterdam – Pendrecht, het Oude Noorden and Bloemhof. The Ondiep district in Utrecht is in the fifth position, followed by Rivierenwijk (Deventer), Spangen (Rotterdam), Oude Westen (Rotterdam), Heechterp/ Schieringen (Leeuwarden) and Noord-Oost (Maastricht).

In Sweden, which has some of the most liberal immigration laws in Europe, large swaths of the southern city of Malmö – which is more than 25% Muslim – are "no-go" zones for non-Muslims. Fire and emergency workers, for example, refuse to enter Malmö's mostly Muslim Rosengaard district without police escorts. The male unemployment rate in Rosengaard is estimated to be above 80%. When fire fighters attempted to put out a fire at Malmö's main mosque, they were attacked by stone throwers.

In the Swedish city of Gothenburg, Muslim youth have been hurling petrol bombs at police cars. In the city's Angered district, where more than 15 police cars have been destroyed, teenagers have also been pointing green lasers at the eyes of police officers, some of whom have been temporarily blinded.

In Gothenburg's Backa district, youth have been throwing stones at patrolling officers. Gothenburg police have also been struggling to deal with the problem of Muslim teenagers burning cars and attacking emergency services in several areas of the city.

According to the Malmö-based Imam Adly Abu Hajar: "Sweden is the best Islamic state."

Complete rubbish of course by the boards resident far right apologist.

I live in Whitechapel -formerly Leytonstone and there is no such thing as no go zones round there or anything like that. Everyone pretty much gts on with everyone else which is how of course it should be.

Can't S&D be moderated please as I find these posts extremely offensive and are only intended to incite hatred and scaremongering.

[shaun1866]

calvin plummers socks, on 15 September 2014 - 04:23 PM, said:

Complete rubbish of course by the boards resident far right apologist.

I live in Whitechapel -formerly Leytonstone and there is no such thing as no go zones round there or anything like that. Everyone pretty much gts on with everyone else which is how of course it should be.

Can't S&D be moderated please as I find these posts extremely offensive and are only intended to incite hatred and scaremongering.

Well I don't so that's 1 for and 1 against good job it's a democratic world hey

[fishini]

calvin plummers socks, on 15 September 2014 - 04:23 PM, said:

Complete rubbish of course by the boards resident far right apologist.

I live in Whitechapel -formerly Leytonstone and there is no such thing as no go zones round there or anything like that. Everyone pretty much gts on with everyone else which is how of course it should be.

Can't S&D be moderated please as I find these posts extremely offensive and are only intended to incite hatred and scaremongering.

I don't find them offensive and find it strange how some refuse to accept the truth irrespective how obnoxious it is. I don't feel hatred and I don't feel scared. I feel sorry that the ones in question who decide to come and live in our country seem to have the inability to integrate themselves into the country of their choice. By trying to impose their beliefs and laws onto their chosen country. No one asked or forced them to come they chose to using their free will. They now have the freedom they desired and often refused in the country of their birth. That after all is what we all want. They have to accept our way of life and laws or return home to where they are the norm. Sharia law must never ever be allowed to prosper in this country. If they want to come here and embrace the country, it's people and it's laws (most do so anyway) then I personally have no problem. The individuals that don't or will not, need to be sent home post haste, they are not wanted or needed