Bob's Board: Liverpool - Bob's Board

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Liverpool

#1 Guest_spireiteblue_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 10:06 AM

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/t...ool/4613695.stm

Liverpool have been allowed to defend there trophy.
0

#2 Guest_The Chief_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 10:12 AM

Great News.. I'm well happy for em
0

#3 User is offline   BITColour 

  • Youth Team Player
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 07-June 05

Posted 10 June 2005 - 10:13 AM

spireiteblue, on Jun 10 2005, 11:06 AM, said:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/t...ool/4613695.stm

Liverpool have been allowed to defend there trophy.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Whilst I agree that they should be allowed to defend the trophy, I think that UEFA should look at the issue where there would be 4 teams anyway participating in the "Champions" League from England (before Liverpool were given a place). They should go back to just the Champions being included and make the UEFA Cup more appealing in terms of revenues etc. For me the Champions League has lost its exclusivity.
0

#4 Guest_spireiteblue_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 10:28 AM

BITColour, on Jun 10 2005, 11:13 AM, said:

Whilst I agree that they should be allowed to defend the trophy, I think that UEFA should look at the issue where there would be 4 teams anyway participating in the "Champions" League from England (before Liverpool were given a place).  They should go back to just the Champions being included and make the UEFA Cup more appealing in terms of revenues etc.  For me the Champions League has lost its exclusivity.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


We do have 4 teams currently Liverpool make 5,they changed the format because of the competitions like the cup winers cup,fairs cup weren't doing so good,probably in money terms but the Champoins League isn't the Champions League any more is it,if they want more teams in it,we in England have 4 Champions,surely that makes more sense,Yeovil versus Liverpool a fixture like that would frighten any giant,but at least all teams would be Champions :lol:
0

#5 Guest_The Chief_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 10:44 AM

I think it is only fair that they should be in it really.. but its just a little awkward
0

#6 User is offline   BITColour 

  • Youth Team Player
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 07-June 05

Posted 10 June 2005 - 10:47 AM

The Chief, on Jun 10 2005, 11:44 AM, said:

I think it is only fair that they should be in it really.. but its just a little awkward
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


I agree they should be in it as they are current holders. What I'm saying is that they wouldn't have been in it in the first place if only the various countries' "champions" were allowed in it, and not up to 4th place in the premiership.
0

#7 Guest_The Chief_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 10:48 AM

BITColour, on Jun 10 2005, 10:47 AM, said:

I agree they should be in it as they are current holders.  What I'm saying is that they wouldn't have been in it in the first place if only the various countries' "champions" were allowed in it, and not up to 4th place in the premiership.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


I dont understand mate..How have they done it

thanks
0

#8 Guest_spireiteblue_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 10:49 AM

BITColour, on Jun 10 2005, 11:47 AM, said:

I agree they should be in it as they are current holders.  What I'm saying is that they wouldn't have been in it in the first place if only the various countries' "champions" were allowed in it, and not up to 4th place in the premiership.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Yes i've said that too on these boards,they have demeaned the competition to what it was.
0

#9 User is offline   BITColour 

  • Youth Team Player
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 07-June 05

Posted 10 June 2005 - 10:52 AM

The Chief, on Jun 10 2005, 11:48 AM, said:

I dont understand mate..How have they done it

thanks
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


I'll try and explain then.....

Champions League - the only teams that should have the right to play in this competition are the teams that win their country's main league i.e. Chelsea, Barca etc (maybe the runners up too?!)

Uefa Cup - the teams that finish third and fourth etc should play in this cup.

To me it makes a mockery of calling it the "Champions" League, when teams such as Everton (that finish 4th) are entitled to play in it. Everton have been Champions of nothing for a good few years now.
0

#10 Guest_The Chief_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 10:55 AM

BITColour, on Jun 10 2005, 10:52 AM, said:

I'll try and explain then.....

Champions League - the only teams that should have the right to play in this competition are the teams that win their country's main league i.e. Chelsea, Barca etc (maybe the runners up too?!)

Uefa Cup - the teams that finish third and fourth etc should play in this cup.

To me it makes a mockery of calling it the "Champions" League, when teams such as Everton (that finish 4th) are entitled to play in it.  Everton have been Champions of nothing for a good few years now.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Aaah thanks.. welli already known that but i asjust wondering how they'vegone about putting pool in the cxhampo league

doesnt matter though

thanks...
0

#11 Guest_spireiteblue_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 10:56 AM

BITColour, on Jun 10 2005, 11:52 AM, said:

I'll try and explain then.....

Champions League - the only teams that should have the right to play in this competition are the teams that win their country's main league i.e. Chelsea, Barca etc (maybe the runners up too?!)

Uefa Cup - the teams that finish third and fourth etc should play in this cup.

To me it makes a mockery of calling it the "Champions" League, when teams such as Everton (that finish 4th) are entitled to play in it.  Everton have been Champions of nothing for a good few years now.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Its all about getting more money out of us fans.
0

#12 Guest_The Chief_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 10:57 AM

spireiteblue, on Jun 10 2005, 10:56 AM, said:

Its all about getting more money out of us fans.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Suppose but BITcolour has a goodpoint about it being the champions league.. and still teamslike everton are entered when they havent even wont the leaguel lol
0

#13 Guest_spireiteblue_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 10:59 AM

The Chief, on Jun 10 2005, 11:57 AM, said:

Suppose but BITcolour has a goodpoint about it being the champions league.. and still teamslike everton are entered when they havent even wont the leaguel lol
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


I know all about that i was around when only Champions were allowed into it,thats where your problems come into play when they start messing about with the rules.
0

#14 User is offline   BITColour 

  • Youth Team Player
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 07-June 05

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:00 AM

The Chief, on Jun 10 2005, 11:55 AM, said:

Aaah thanks.. welli already known that but i asjust wondering how they'vegone about putting pool in the cxhampo league

doesnt matter though

thanks...
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


On the radio this morning they were talking about withdrawing one of the teams from somewhere like Andorra, Slovakia etc. Okay, so they won't win the Champions League, but, they are Champions!
0

#15 Guest_The Chief_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:00 AM

spireiteblue, on Jun 10 2005, 10:59 AM, said:

I know all about that i was around when only Champions were allowed into it,thats where your problems come into play when they start messing about with the rules.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Do you think it would be better with just the champions init or not ?
0

#16 Guest_spireiteblue_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:01 AM

BITColour, on Jun 10 2005, 12:00 PM, said:

On the radio this morning they were talking about withdrawing one of the teams from somewhere like Andorra, Slovakia etc.  Okay, so they won't win the Champions League, but, they are Champions!
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


I can't see where they have withdrawn any one.
0

#17 Guest_spireiteblue_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:03 AM

The Chief, on Jun 10 2005, 12:00 PM, said:

Do you think it would be better with just the champions init or not ?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Sure it would be better with just Champions and called The European Cup as it used to be known.
0

#18 User is offline   BITColour 

  • Youth Team Player
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 07-June 05

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:03 AM

The Chief, on Jun 10 2005, 12:00 PM, said:

Do you think it would be better with just the champions init or not ?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Champions and runners-up maximum. If they didn't let so many teams in the Champions League, then there would be bigger teams in the Uefa Cup etc that would boost its profile. If Everton, Arsenal and Man Utd were in the Uefa Cup there would be plenty of interest, as would be the case with Real Madrid in Spain.
0

#19 Guest_The Chief_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:07 AM

spireiteblue, on Jun 10 2005, 11:03 AM, said:

Sure it would be better with just Champions and called The European Cup as it used to be known.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Ithink it would be better like that.. and it would makemore sense
0

#20 Guest_The Chief_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 June 2005 - 11:07 AM

BITColour, on Jun 10 2005, 11:03 AM, said:

Champions and runners-up maximum.  If they didn't let so many teams in the Champions League, then there would be bigger teams in the Uefa Cup etc that would boost its profile.  If Everton, Arsenal and Man Utd were in the Uefa Cup there would be plenty of interest, as would be the case with Real Madrid in Spain.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


ithink it would be best with just the champions innit
0

Share this topic:


  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users