[dim view]

spireloz, on Jun 22 2005, 08:33 PM, said:

All this just reiterates the obvious need to use our own names on the message boards.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Hi Loz.
Can we take this forward on Mark's other thread?

[dannypearson]

dim view, on Jun 22 2005, 09:41 PM, said:

Hi
Yep, sorry, I answered LOZ at the same time.

This is what Howard wrote.
'I'm quite happy to stand down if it causes such offence. Would the most critical one please come and take over', so is it strictly true or not?.
I have no personal vendetta against Mark. Please show me the evidence.
Doesn't his thread above show that he has a vendetta against me?.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I am not really bothered who has instigated any vendetta to be honest.

The evidence is clear for all to see in the tone of your post, I do not need to show any other.

Mark was not being critical towards Howard if you read the post through again you will see that Mark was never critising Howard, in fact he was sticking up for him.

[Lorraine]

dim view, on Jun 22 2005, 08:45 PM, said:

Hi Loz.
Can we take this forward on Mark's other thread?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Of course. No problem.

[dim view]

dannypearson, on Jun 22 2005, 08:46 PM, said:

I am not really bothered who has instigated any vendetta to be honest.

The evidence is clear for all to see in the tone of your post, I do not need to show any other.

Mark was not being critical towards Howard if you read the post through again you will see that Mark was never critising Howard, in fact he was sticking up for him.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

yes Danny, thanks for that. I don't think anybody has actually at any time suggested that Mark was criticising Howard.

[dannypearson]

dim view, on Jun 22 2005, 10:30 PM, said:

yes Danny, thanks for that. I don't think anybody has actually at any time suggested that Mark was criticising Howard.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

you suggested that Mark's comments in some way persuaded Howard to stand down.

dim view, on Jun 22 2005, 12:04 AM, said:

but I would have thought that the apology should go to Howard, who on reading your jibberish would naturally have felt like resigning. Please use all your influence to try and stop him.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

[dim view]

dannypearson, on Jun 22 2005, 09:38 PM, said:

you suggested that Mark's comments in some way persuaded Howard to stand down.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Groan. As Basil Fawlty said, I hope we can clarify this before one of us dies.

Mark's posting created the impression that I had criticised Howard, because Mark thought that I was SALTERGATE, whover he (or she) is.

[dannypearson]

dim view, on Jun 22 2005, 11:01 PM, said:

Groan. As Basil Fawlty said, I hope we can clarify this before one of us dies.

Mark's posting created the impression that I had criticised Howard, because Mark thought that I was SALTERGATE, whover he (or she) is.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Reading between the lines and not knowing the facts on either side (I have never met you and I have only met Mark at Volunteers meetings and twice in the pub on message board get together's) what Mark was saying is that you pm'd him a while ago (presumably under the name Vierra Duckworth) about Howard being paid and told him it was hush hush. (I do not want to labour on that point because I do not want any-body in any way shape or form to think that that fact is important. ) I am presuming that is what he thought that you were using the new name SALTERGATE.

If I have read the post wrong then I publically apologise to both you and to Mark.

[dannypearson]

spireiteblue, on Jun 22 2005, 11:09 PM, said:

I would like to take up the point about free/complimentary tickets,this practice should stop immediately we need all the money through the gates we can get,i don't care and i am not at all in any way jealous of any one who gets them,the only way a free ticket becomes available is like through a prize draw.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

The tickets that SALTERGATE was suggesting are for away games blue, the club wouldn't lose out on any revenue at all.

That said I don't believe that the person who was suggested gets free tickets actually does.

[dannypearson]

spireiteblue, on Jun 22 2005, 11:15 PM, said:

It didn't state home or away so i don't know.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Here you go

SALTERGATE, on Jun 16 2005, 10:45 AM, said:

Well done Mark, what a super hero you are, anybody would think that people have never done anything before for this club, like walking the Pembrokeshire coast, arranging 10 mile sponsored walks, having stalls at medieval market day, 7 mad men travelling to every ground in the country, sporting dinners with Jack Charlton and Gordon Banks etc.. People knocking on doors in every inch of North Derbyshire to get signatures so their season ticket money could be used so the ground could be upgraded,, counting coppers in the office till the cows come home to pay Mike Pollitt's wages whilst most of the CFSS board sit back and watch, or even get paid through grants for invented positions within the society and club (like community liason officer, roles not seen advertised for in the real world so we ensure we get a qualified experieinced man for the job)! making sure they take their free tickets for the away games  (and friends, ask Spireloz) .

On the subject of the ground, people are bound to be sceptical, worried that we will be screwed once again, lets face it our board are Norton's sidekicks and they have a track record of cocking up on ground relocation, the only secure piece of land we have, not open to a Sissons type of businessman is Saltergate, we should and still should upgrade our ancestral home now and move forward, and don't start the crap about generating money, if Saltergate is done right we would generate money significantly more than we do now and if we market it properly the ptotential to generate as much as a new stadium based on it's close location to the Town Centre.

Good luck Mark, enjoy Chatsworth, you are an incredible breed, CFSS have managed to grind most supporters into the ground but you show incredible resillience, keep up the good work.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

[dannypearson]

spireiteblue, on Jun 22 2005, 11:23 PM, said:

C F C still get an income from away games so i suppose if a ticket isn't paid for then that ticket cannot be added to our income ?.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

They do not - the home team gets all the gate revenue from league games, only in cup games would we get any gate revenue from an away game.

[dim view]

dannypearson, on Jun 22 2005, 10:10 PM, said:

Reading between the lines and not knowing the facts on either side (I have never met you and I have only met Mark at Volunteers meetings and twice in the pub on message board get together's)  what Mark was saying is that you pm'd him a while ago (presumably under the name Vierra Duckworth) about Howard being paid and told him it was hush hush.  (I do not want to labour on that point because I do not want any-body in any way shape or form to think that that fact is important. )  I am presuming that is what he thought that you were using the new name SALTERGATE.

If I have read the post wrong then I publically apologise to both you and to Mark.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I'm thinking of holding a 'Quiz Dave Bowler' night as a fund raiser.

No, that's quite ok. Mark thought that SALTERGATE's nasty swipe at the Community Liasion Officer was aimed at Howard.
Howard's payments were all above board and fully endorsed. Indeed, I seconded one of the proposals to pay him.
In a private and confidential email PM to Mark, with Mark fully aware of my real name, I had a moan about minutes not being published punctually and said that this created the impression that some decisions for example Howard's payment, which I fully supported, were being kept hush hush.
For Mark to imply that I backed the delay was very naughty, but it just supported his case for nailing me as SALTERGATE. Some people can be trusted with private emails, and others can't.

[dim view]

Mark Jones, on Jun 23 2005, 07:10 AM, said:

LMAO.. tea pot and kettle...AGAIN!!
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

havent a clue what you are referring to. Have a nice holiday, and come back refreshed.

[Town_Fan]

Mark Jones, on Jun 23 2005, 08:29 AM, said:

Who was it went running to Howard to have a go at him after something I said in a pm?

Tea pot and kettle
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

*sigh*

With gheyness like this no wonder CFSS is dying on its ****, its like a nursery school only less well run.