[PositiveOmen]

I voted Yes, because i trust him, while making stupid decisions like keeping Rico, to keep the club stable.

However if you said, can we progress with BH at the helm? It would be a big fat NO.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

PositiveOmen, on Jan 18 2009, 12:42 PM, said:

I voted Yes, because i trust him, while making stupid decisions like keeping Rico, to keep the club stable.

However if you said, can we progress with BH at the helm? It would be a big fat NO.

You, like many, use the word 'stable'.

But surely being stable means maintaining a consistent position?

In the last two years we've gone from the bottom half of League One to the bottom half of League Two; we've seen the best part of a thousand fans per game turn their backs on the Club, and only plugged the financial losses this has incured by selling our greatest asset.

Can this really be called stability?

To me, rather than offering 'stability', all Hubbard and Co. have delivered is egotistical, inept, self serving, and ultra-complacent amateurism.

[PositiveOmen]

Stability in footballing terms in reality in this day and age, is staying afloat, and not having money problems. So while it's not going to get people's hearts racing or further us as i said before, his ability to keep us ok with money, a league club, with our own ground, and a decent youth system, says stable to me.