[Mr Mercury]

Tylerdurdencfc, on 23 June 2024 - 05:32 PM, said:

Simple truth is,

Tories - noone likes them anymore due to their antics.

Reform - apparently racist, nut job supporting invaders.


Lib Dems - lack a voice

Labour - silent assassins that will increase all taxes apart from income tax, vat and NI. Get ready for your council taxes to rise. Living in a fantasy world and have been poor/weak opposition and will get in based on the Tories downfall and nothing more.

Not really inspiring is it?

Is this the worst ever general election for the voting public?

I?ve said this previously on here but paradoxically were probably going to have the biggest margin of win in modern times by a party that nobody, apart from their loyal followers, really has any enthusiasm for. That’s certainly the case with Starmer.
I remember Blair winning in 97 and he was almost like a rock star, it felt like a carnival when he won a landslide, there was genuine hope and optimism, something sadly lacking when talking about the upcoming landslide. Oh and Blair worked out well didn?t he?
I might not even vote tbh.

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: Today, 05:44 PM

[s42blue]

 The Earl of Chesterfield, on 23 June 2024 - 08:26 AM, said:

I almost felt sorry for today's studio stooge James 'not so' Cleverly this morning.

Well, almost.

First he had to wriggle and squirm his way around this: https://www.bbc.com/...es/cn440850elmo

Which was pretty much impossible as it only echoed, erm, this: https://www.independ...k-b2448446.html

And things only went downhill from there, as what's become known as 'Gamblegate' entered the conversation: https://www.huffingt...4b0fdfa60648d25

Oh dear. Simply hiding behind 'I can't comment as there's an investigation' was just desperate. Eye rollingly desperate.

But hey, he might've cheered himself up laughing at all those who furiously demand Lineker or Neville or Vorderman or The ABoC or any other media figure 'keep their nose out of politics' suddenly cheering JK Rowling's comments...

Werent folk making names up for politicians childish? Seems to be now ok.

And shouldnt due process be followed? Or you?re just assuming theyre guilty? Im sure Raynor was allowed due process?

Dont get me wrong I think the Tories are an awful party and will get walloped but play by the same rules surely?

This post has been edited by s42blue: Today, 07:55 PM

[Johnnyspireite7]

 s42blue, on 23 June 2024 - 07:54 PM, said:

Werent folk making names up for politicians childish? Seems to be now ok.

And shouldnt due process be followed? Or you?re just assuming theyre guilty? Im sure Raynor was allowed due process?

Dont get me wrong I think the Tories are an awful party and will get walloped but play by the same rules surely?

When they are the ones making the rules and then being the same idiots breaking the rules they've created they're fair game in my book.

[calvin plummers socks]

 Mr Mercury, on 23 June 2024 - 05:40 PM, said:

I?ve said this previously on here but paradoxically were probably going to have the biggest margin of win in modern times by a party that nobody, apart from their loyal followers, really has any enthusiasm for. That?s certainly the case with Starmer.
I remember Blair winning in 97 and he was almost like a rock star, it felt like a carnival when he won a landslide, there was genuine hope and optimism, something sadly lacking when talking about the upcoming landslide. Oh and Blair worked out well didn?t he?
I might not even vote tbh.

4 years of daily political nonsense from this clown and now he ?might not even vote?
It?s political correctness gone mad

[Mr Mercury]

 The Earl of Chesterfield, on 23 June 2024 - 08:26 AM, said:

I almost felt sorry for today's studio stooge James 'not so' Cleverly this morning.

Well, almost.

First he had to wriggle and squirm his way around this: https://www.bbc.com/...es/cn440850elmo

Which was pretty much impossible as it only echoed, erm, this: https://www.independ...k-b2448446.html

And things only went downhill from there, as what's become known as 'Gamblegate' entered the conversation: https://www.huffingt...4b0fdfa60648d25

Oh dear. Simply hiding behind 'I can't comment as there's an investigation' was just desperate. Eye rollingly desperate.

But hey, he might've cheered himself up laughing at all those who furiously demand Lineker or Neville or Vorderman or The ABoC or any other media figure 'keep their nose out of politics' suddenly cheering JK Rowling's comments...

Suddenly cheering JKR? not me, I?ve been championing her view against left wing bigots for a while.
Oh and off piste, female nurses at Darlington memorial hospital have complained about a transgender colleague spending overly long times in the female changing room, intimidating behaviour and staring at them undressing, have been told, rather than being supported, that they need re education and made to feel like bigots. You?re not the bigots ladies.
Oh and btw, could you please direct me to where I?ve ?repeatedly refused to condem the events of Jan 6?, an accusation you made yesterday. Or admit it?s not the case.

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: Today, 09:00 PM

[Mr Mercury]

s42blue, on 23 June 2024 - 07:54 PM, said:

Werent folk making names up for politicians childish? Seems to be now ok.

And shouldnt due process be followed? Or you?re just assuming theyre guilty? Im sure Raynor was allowed due process?

Dont get me wrong I think the Tories are an awful party and will get walloped but play by the same rules surely?

Who can forget the hilarious Mancock name, it still makes me guffaw now. Yet Krankie for our beloved Sturgeon was deemed childish. You, like myself, have got this section sussed as well mate. Political activism, quote courtesy of Frears Ghost, abounds on these threads.

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: Today, 09:22 PM