[Benno Spire]

What a joke this club is at the moment, what next?
Go back to washing cars Carson, all these **** ups on your watch!!

[moondog]

The club's expectation is a fine

[Spire-Heights]

moondog, on 11 May 2018 - 05:35 PM, said:

The club's expectation is a fine

How much and where will the money come from to pay it?

[dim view]

moondog, on 11 May 2018 - 05:35 PM, said:

The club's expectation is a fine

In the singular?

It's so reassuring that there were no inland revenue or NI complications.

[Benno Spire]

So Carson, the club wasn’t linked with the shambles across the road well the FA think so

[dim view]

moondog, on 11 May 2018 - 02:01 PM, said:

Chesterfield have been charged for misconduct relating to financial irregularities.

It is alleged that in allowing an external organisation, namely the CFC Football Development School Ltd, to pay the wages of former players Jake Orrell and Myles Wright whilst not fully recording the payments on its accounting records, the club breached FA Rule C1.

Chesterfield have until 17 May 2018 to respond to the charge.

Wor I'd like to know as a non accountant is whether the absence of one or more CFC pros from the regular CFC wages run should be picked up by the accountants/auditors?

[calvin plummers socks]

moondog, on 11 May 2018 - 05:35 PM, said:

The club's expectation is a fine

The 'club' know **** all about anything (hence the FA investigation......)

[Valley Blues]

moondog, on 11 May 2018 - 05:35 PM, said:

The club's expectation is a fine

Based on what?

Please could you ask why the club expect the punishment to be a fine as opposed to a points deduction.

I'd assume this expectation is based upon something.

[Stockholm Spireite]

moondog, on 11 May 2018 - 05:35 PM, said:

The club's expectation is a fine

Just wait until we hear it's a fine and a transfer ban... *

* denotes bad joke, btw

[fishini]

calvin plummers socks, on 11 May 2018 - 02:31 PM, said:

Ashley's view?! FFS
This cretin has almost singkehandedly brought about the downfall and shame on the Club.
I see Tony Fernandes of QPR has graded himself a C+ (taking QPR from Prem mid table to 16th in Chanpionship.
Wonder if Moondog could ask Carson how he grades himself on his work at town

Hey up Moondog if someone called Carson trustworthy, honest and caring could they be sued for deformation of character?

[trickytrevsfanclub]

Deducting points should be for the season in which the deed was done. Or the season in which it’s discovered. That’s my thoughts on it anyway, I’m probably wrong.
I don’t see how the FA can sit on something they’ve known about for a while then apply a points deduction for another season. This is at least a couple of years ago now and they’ve clearly known about it for a good while.

[NOFX]

Brilliant businessman that ashley Carson isn’t he dave allen ?

[moondog]

fishini, on 11 May 2018 - 06:30 PM, said:

Hey up Moondog if someone called Carson trustworthy, honest and caring could they be sued for deformation of character?

[Heavy_Soul]

fishini, on 11 May 2018 - 06:30 PM, said:

Hey up Moondog if someone called Carson trustworthy, honest and caring could they be sued for deformation of character?

Brilliant!

[NOFX]

moondog, on 11 May 2018 - 05:35 PM, said:

The club's expectation is a fine

Can’t they retrospectively run the fit and proper persons test and conclude that allen and Carson are a pair of cretins and put the club in the hands of a trust ? Wishful thinking I know

This post has been edited by NOFX: 11 May 2018 - 06:43 PM

[Blue5]

I do not envy Ashley. Last one in the firing line and no idea what the FA are sat on.

[valemadness]

trickytrevsfanclub, on 11 May 2018 - 06:35 PM, said:

Deducting points should be for the season in which the deed was done. Or the season in which it’s discovered. That’s my thoughts on it anyway, I’m probably wrong.
I don’t see how the FA can sit on something they’ve known about for a while then apply a points deduction for another season. This is at least a couple of years ago now and they’ve clearly known about it for a good while.

If their investigation wasn't finished until after 31st March, then points can't be deducted after that date.

[Westbars Spireite]

dim view, on 11 May 2018 - 05:51 PM, said:

Wor I'd like to know as a non accountant is whether the absence of one or more CFC pros from the regular CFC wages run should be picked up by the accountants/auditors?

As a fellow non accountant my guess is no. I would expect the club to use their bank's online software which would show the salary run as a single debit on the the bank statement.

[Westbars Spireite]

trickytrevsfanclub, on 11 May 2018 - 06:35 PM, said:

Deducting points should be for the season in which the deed was done. Or the season in which it’s discovered. That’s my thoughts on it anyway, I’m probably wrong.
I don’t see how the FA can sit on something they’ve known about for a while then apply a points deduction for another season. This is at least a couple of years ago now and they’ve clearly known about it for a good while.

You are, yes.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

trickytrevsfanclub, on 11 May 2018 - 06:35 PM, said:

Deducting points should be for the season in which the deed was done. Or the season in which it’s discovered. That’s my thoughts on it anyway, I’m probably wrong.
I don’t see how the FA can sit on something they’ve known about for a while then apply a points deduction for another season. This is at least a couple of years ago now and they’ve clearly known about it for a good while.

Are you seriously trying to suggest the FA are somehow at fault?

What next - fans and former employees who did the right thing?

Here's what you should be focussing on - how many people were involved in contracts that clearly relied upon illegal behaviour and who, ultimately, appointed those people...

This post has been edited by MDCCCLXVI: 11 May 2018 - 07:07 PM