Help
They played to lose and were disqualified.
I dont understand what you are getting at. I wasn't trying to prove a point, I was discussing what I prefer personally.
This post has been edited by Mark Jones: 03 August 2012 - 08:05 AM
Badminton Debacle
#21 Guest_Mark Jones_*
Posted 03 August 2012 - 08:03 AM
How?
They played to lose and were disqualified.
I dont understand what you are getting at. I wasn't trying to prove a point, I was discussing what I prefer personally.
They played to lose and were disqualified.
I dont understand what you are getting at. I wasn't trying to prove a point, I was discussing what I prefer personally.
#22
moondog 
- Legend
-
- Group: Moderators
- Posts: 26,820
- Joined: 09-June 05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Chesterfield
Posted 03 August 2012 - 09:55 AM
Mark Jones, on 03 August 2012 - 08:03 AM, said:
How?
They played to lose and were disqualified.
I dont understand what you are getting at. I wasn't trying to prove a point, I was discussing what I prefer personally.
They played to lose and were disqualified.
I dont understand what you are getting at. I wasn't trying to prove a point, I was discussing what I prefer personally.
Badminton is a game with clear rules and very little to Judge (like a race) the points I was trying to make was the winner of a particular "non judged" event may not be the best
