Derbyshire Times Latest
#101
Posted 30 March 2016 - 07:45 AM
http://www.derbyshir...aster-1-7823419
#102
Posted 30 March 2016 - 09:20 AM
RGS, on 30 March 2016 - 07:45 AM, said:
http://www.derbyshir...aster-1-7823419
Ayup, Graham.
So, has the Club responded to your submitted questions?
#103
Posted 30 March 2016 - 09:34 AM
#104
Posted 30 March 2016 - 09:38 AM
http://www.derbyshir...hands-1-7823645
Video flashback - last three clashes against Port Vale
http://www.derbyshir...-vale-1-7823628
#105
Posted 30 March 2016 - 09:43 AM
RGS, on 30 March 2016 - 09:34 AM, said:
Good news - thankyou.
#106
Posted 30 March 2016 - 11:04 AM
MDCCCLXVI, on 30 March 2016 - 09:43 AM, said:
I think the Derbyshire times is on the way back as a newspaper,I think it's been a great read recently,but I'd make some changes.
A dedicated grassroots football section ,the Sunday adults league gets too much coverage,it is a washed up league and a pale shadow of what it used to be coverage of grassroots football should be concentrated at junior level and used as an initiative to getting children into sport,grassroots football at junior level is thriving at present,equal coverage should be given to all clubs
#107
Posted 30 March 2016 - 11:23 AM
From my own experience as sports editor at the Worksop Guardian for the past several years, the number of people willing to send in a brief report on their grassroots football side has diminished. At one stage we could run two full pages of junior reports from Worksop teams. These days you might get two reports per week at best. And you'd think it'd be easier, just emailing a few paragraphs from your phone rather than hand writing the report and posting it into the office like the days of old.
#109
Posted 30 March 2016 - 11:43 AM
RGS, on 30 March 2016 - 11:23 AM, said:
From my own experience as sports editor at the Worksop Guardian for the past several years, the number of people willing to send in a brief report on their grassroots football side has diminished. At one stage we could run two full pages of junior reports from Worksop teams. These days you might get two reports per week at best. And you'd think it'd be easier, just emailing a few paragraphs from your phone rather than hand writing the report and posting it into the office like the days of old.
Experience of this from a cricket point of view is that you'd go to the trouble of sending a report into the DT only for it to be butchered to about 5 lines to fit in around the Chesterfield CC weekly double page spread or left out completely and eventually you just got fed up of bothering if it was a waste of time. There are numerous cricket clubs in and around Chesterfield playing cricket at a decent standard yet only Chesterfield CC seemed to get coverage.
#110
Posted 30 March 2016 - 12:03 PM
JonB, on 30 March 2016 - 11:43 AM, said:
This too will get passed on.
#112
Posted 30 March 2016 - 12:14 PM
JonB, on 30 March 2016 - 11:43 AM, said:
I used to send in reports which were tagged 'Times Reporter'. It wasn't so much the butchering of them I objected to (their choice but often made little sense when they'd done) more the fact I never got a single thanks via email. Not once.
#113
Posted 30 March 2016 - 12:25 PM
#115
Posted 31 March 2016 - 04:02 PM
JonB, on 30 March 2016 - 12:04 PM, said:
I know the Chairman at Chesterfield CC has got good contacts in the media and has built up good relationships.
#116
Posted 31 March 2016 - 04:04 PM
#118
Posted 01 April 2016 - 12:20 PM
http://m.derbyshiret...nager-1-7827052