[Mr Mercury]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 20 January 2024 - 05:25 PM, said:

Thanks.

No, really, I mean it.

Because this continuing catalogue of schoolyard standard hypocrisy and evasion embarrasses all those who can't wait to accuse some of it yet say word zero to others almost as much as it embarrasses you...

Whose embarrassed?, certainly not me!
I doubt many people are embarrassed by having a different view to you, and certainly not by anybody on here.

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 20 January 2024 - 06:58 PM

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Mr Mercury, on 20 January 2024 - 06:56 PM, said:

Whose embarrassed?, certainly not me!
I doubt many people are embarrassed by having a different view to you, and certainly not by anybody on here.

But there you go yet - YET - again.

Hiding behind victimhood - being somehow persecuted for having a "different view" - when this is really about your serial hypocrisy.

No 'different views', just straightforward facts.

Fact: Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak and several other then government members claimed to've somehow 'lost' possibly revealing messages relating to the Pandemic.

Fact: you at best expressed indifference, and at worst refused to criticise because of ridiculous comments like 'I don't know him (Boris the Liar) personally'.

Fact: but here you all too predictably accusing Sturgeon of being a 'wrong 'un' for doing the same or less. Then once more ducking and dodging an opportunity to demonstrate consistency amidst jeers 'nobody on here' deserves such honesty.

As you've done whenever confronted by your snipes at one side of politics despite excusing, or even endorsing catalogues of corruption amongst your chosen side.

Okay, there might be a small cabal on here prepared to back-pat bigotry or turn blind eyes to such adolescent contradictions. However the moral though silent majority look on with furrowed brows...

[Mr Mercury]

No victim hood at all, another of your buzz words. I couldn’t care less if people think I embarrass myself here. And as always you love to think you speak for the silent majority.

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 20 January 2024 - 11:17 PM

[Mr Mercury]

Mr Mercury, on 20 January 2024 - 11:15 PM, said:

No victim hood at all, another of your buzz words. I couldn’t care less if people think I embarrass myself here. And as always you love to think you speak for the silent majority.

Repost

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 21 January 2024 - 04:14 AM

[fishini]

Mr Mercury, on 20 January 2024 - 05:14 PM, said:

Nah you lot just buy it!

You don't half talk rubbish

[Mr Mercury]

fishini, on 21 January 2024 - 08:21 AM, said:

You don't half talk rubbish

You missed out Demi god. Another with go to phrases.

[Mr Mercury]

Ahead of the game here, way ahead of the game!

https://www.politico...-ruined-legacy/

[Mr Mercury]

Humza gone now. What a sh.t show the SNP have become. A conveyor belt of power crazed zealots, in fact revisiting Humzas “white, white, white” speech of a few years ago he could even be classed as a racist, forcing identify politics on folk. Sadly their implosion is good news for Labour North of the border. Will they retain the hate speech law if they get in, or will they see sense?

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 29 April 2024 - 07:47 PM

[isleaiw1]

Mr Mercury, on 29 April 2024 - 07:44 PM, said:

Humza gone now. What a sh.t show the SNP have become. A conveyor belt of power crazed zealots, in fact revisiting Humzas “white, white, white” speech of a few years ago he could even be classed as a racist, forcing identify politics on folk. Sadly their implosion is good news for Labour North of the border. Will they retain the hate speech law if they get in, or will they see sense?

The most important part of the challenges they face is indeed what it means for westminster. Will a new leader inspire better support for the party in power and damage Labour's chances (and am I talking about Holyrood or Westminster...)

I suspect SKS was the happiest man today about events in Scotland..

[Mr Mercury]

isleaiw1, on 29 April 2024 - 08:38 PM, said:

The most important part of the challenges they face is indeed what it means for westminster. Will a new leader inspire better support for the party in power and damage Labour's chances (and am I talking about Holyrood or Westminster...)

I suspect SKS was the happiest man today about events in Scotland..

For the result of the end game I’d imagine KS only cares at this point in time about the Westminster elections.