[Search & Destroy]

So how many from these war torn countries?

No limits?

Me, I?ll be selfish

This post has been edited by Search & Destroy: 25 May 2024 - 02:42 PM

[isleaiw1]

Search & Destroy, on 25 May 2024 - 02:41 PM, said:

So how many from these war torn countries?

No limits?

Me, I?ll be selfish

Hope your kids and grandkids dont hold that against you later...

Bet you vote for the party that is best for you and sod the rest too...

[Search & Destroy]

 isleaiw1, on 25 May 2024 - 03:09 PM, said:

Hope your kids and grandkids dont hold that against you later...

Bet you vote for the party that is best for you and sod the rest too...

How many?

[s42blue]

 Search & Destroy, on 25 May 2024 - 09:20 AM, said:

How can I answer, it?s a report that highlights Somalian crime in Germany, similar results to the report from Denmark


I asked it it was racist, you replied to the post but didn?t answer the question

My view is that mass immigration from Islamic, war torn , 3rd world countries is disastrous for Western Europe

You don?t reply to Qs so I?m good.

But no I don?t think it?s racist.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Farage gets his ass handed him by Trev Phillips this AM.

His racist rhetoric is just getting, well, predictably boring, too.

'Everything's the fault of Muslims...migrants...Muslims...shut the borders...Muslims...and we're the only ones with the courage to say it...'.

'But hold on...', said TP, '..how can you complain about arrivals from the rest of the world when you campaigned to get rid of Europeans (read: white quasi Christians)?'.

Oh, it's also okay that he's more bothered about campaigning for Trump than his latest ego vehicle here because it's a decision he's taken "reluctantly".

Yeah, how patriotic. How 'courageous'. Nothing to do with already being rejected seven times, either...

This post has been edited by The Earl of Chesterfield: Yesterday, 11:09 AM

[isleaiw1]

Search & Destroy, on 25 May 2024 - 05:04 PM, said:

How many?

Our fair share whilst the rest of Europe does their fair share.

Would you have them all in Greece or wherever they first land?

[Search & Destroy]

 isleaiw1, on 26 May 2024 - 12:25 PM, said:

Our fair share whilst the rest of Europe does their fair share.

Would you have them all in Greece or wherever they first land?

Fair share?

So when we?ve reached our quota they come over on the boats


And we are back to where we are now, do you then return them as I thought that wasn?t allowed, where do you return them to?

France?

Rwanda?

[isleaiw1]

Search & Destroy, on 26 May 2024 - 01:13 PM, said:

Fair share?

So when we?ve reached our quota they come over on the boats


And we are back to where we are now, do you then return them as I thought that wasn?t allowed, where do you return them to?

France?

Rwanda?

Fair share has no quota, it is about taking them until what they are running from ends. maybe it would make the world leaders a bit keener to resolve the base problems - which obvs dont bother you as its not affecting you and that is all that matters..

Dont treat the symptoms, treat the cause.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Here's an idea - why not go back to where we were, say, five years ago?

With legal routes available for those fleeing horror and persecution?

With proper processing of claims?

With an agreement those not achieving asylum criteria could be returned to where they left?

With folk from nations with 'similar economies' doing jobs that needed doing?

Yeah, what could possibly have happened to prevent all that...

This post has been edited by The Earl of Chesterfield: Yesterday, 04:45 PM

[s42blue]

 The Earl of Chesterfield, on 26 May 2024 - 04:44 PM, said:

Here's an idea - why not go back to where we were, say, five years ago?

With legal routes available for those fleeing horror and persecution?

With proper processing of claims?

With an agreement those not achieving asylum criteria could be returned to where they left?

With folk from nations with 'similar economies' doing jobs that needed doing?

Yeah, what could possibly have happened to prevent all that...

I totally agree. But are Labour taking us back?

I think more Blues would vote Red if they were so bold. But no let?s be ever so teeny bit left of centre and not be Blue. No bold leaders. Just those who have a desire to be the big I Am.