Help
Wonder what Roy's excuse is this week? Dread to think!
#1
Spireite-Karl 
- Legend
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 19,037
- Joined: 05-January 06
Posted 02 March 2007 - 10:37 PM
My guess is that we lost because the loan player he was trying to sign became injured so we couldn't sign him
#notapennymore
#2
Wooden Spoon
- Legend
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 42,656
- Joined: 07-June 05
- Gender:Male
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:26 PM
Spireite-Karl, on Mar 2 2007, 10:37 PM, said:
My guess is that we lost because the loan player he was trying to sign became injured so we couldn't sign him
we lost because our squad lacks depth and quality, and has done all season. i still think our saving grace will be 4 teams worse than us.
A new hope.
#3
SpireiteDan
- First Team Player
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,781
- Joined: 06-June 05
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:29 PM
death, on Mar 2 2007, 11:26 PM, said:
we lost because our squad lacks depth and quality, and has done all season. i still think our saving grace will be 4 teams worse than us.
I would really like to know who those teams are.......ok, i'll give you Rotherham.
#4
Wooden Spoon
- Legend
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 42,656
- Joined: 07-June 05
- Gender:Male
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:35 PM
SpireiteDan, on Mar 2 2007, 11:29 PM, said:
I would really like to know who those teams are.......ok, i'll give you Rotherham.
cheltenham.
bournemouth.
millers.
then one from northampton/leyton o/ and bradford are new in the drop zone, and have lost the talisman windass.
seasons start i thought with the squad we had, and our "BREATHER" taking leaders, 5th bottom on GD would be our finish, and i stand by that prediction.
This post has been edited by death: 02 March 2007 - 11:37 PM
A new hope.
#5
azul
- Legend
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 34,133
- Joined: 15-June 05
- Gender:Male
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:35 PM
SpireiteDan, on Mar 2 2007, 11:29 PM, said:
I would really like to know who those teams are.......ok, i'll give you Rotherham.
well we'll soon find out
Accentuate th Positive, eliminate the negative
#7
azul
- Legend
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 34,133
- Joined: 15-June 05
- Gender:Male
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:39 PM
Spireite-Karl, on Mar 2 2007, 10:37 PM, said:
My guess is that we lost because the loan player he was trying to sign became injured so we couldn't sign him
Silly defensive errors by individuals cost us
Can't plan againts that = management not to blame
Accentuate th Positive, eliminate the negative
#8
Wooden Spoon
- Legend
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 42,656
- Joined: 07-June 05
- Gender:Male
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:42 PM
azul, on Mar 2 2007, 11:39 PM, said:
Silly defensive errors by individuals cost us
A new hope.
#9
forevablue
- Reserve Team Player
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,342
- Joined: 06-June 05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Chesterfield
Posted 03 March 2007 - 01:19 AM
azul, on Mar 2 2007, 11:39 PM, said:
Silly defensive errors by individuals cost us
Can't plan againts that = management not to blame
Can't plan againts that = management not to blame
Manager plays young inexperienced kid instead of Davies. We were shocking tonight and currently there aren't 4 teams worse than us.
If there is no new blood in next week we will probably go down.
#10
spiriete kev
- Youth Team Player
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 15-October 06
Posted 03 March 2007 - 09:38 AM
death, on Mar 2 2007, 11:35 PM, said:
cheltenham.
bournemouth.
millers.
then one from northampton/leyton o/ and bradford are new in the drop zone, and have lost the talisman windass.
seasons start i thought with the squad we had, and our "BREATHER" taking leaders, 5th bottom on GD would be our finish, and i stand by that prediction.
bournemouth.
millers.
then one from northampton/leyton o/ and bradford are new in the drop zone, and have lost the talisman windass.
seasons start i thought with the squad we had, and our "BREATHER" taking leaders, 5th bottom on GD would be our finish, and i stand by that prediction.
theres one team worse than us and thats rotherham
#11 Guest_spireiteblue_*
Posted 03 March 2007 - 09:45 AM
spiriete kev, on Mar 3 2007, 09:38 AM, said:
theres one team worse than us and thats rotherham
Tranmere wasn't that much better than us and they are in a play off place
they just know how to put there chances away,we don't.
#12
spiriete kev
- Youth Team Player
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 15-October 06
Posted 03 March 2007 - 09:51 AM
spireiteblue, on Mar 3 2007, 09:45 AM, said:
Tranmere wasn't that much better than us and they are in a play off place they just know how to put there chances away,we don't.
they just know how to put there chances away,we don't.the football in this div is generally poor ,the difference between the teams at the top and bottom is simple the teams at the top can defend and score goals the teams like ourselves at the bottom cant do either
#13
BlueRover52
- If it aint broke don't fix it!
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 14,245
- Joined: 31-December 06
- Gender:Male
- Location:Major Oak
Posted 03 March 2007 - 10:38 AM
azul, on Mar 2 2007, 11:39 PM, said:
Silly defensive errors by individuals cost us
Can't plan againts that = management not to blame
Can't plan againts that = management not to blame
Manager picked Meredith to play in a difficult debut when perhaps not 90 mins match fit. Also persisted too long with 2 ineffective,inept strikers.
Many a good tune
#15
dtr36
- keeper of the kop flag
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,199
- Joined: 26-October 05
- Gender:Male
- Location:new whitt
- Interests:watchin great football at chesterfield />women fast cars and bikes
Posted 03 March 2007 - 11:20 AM
it easy roy tell the player the 3 g rule
Get the ball
Get in there area
Get a Goal
but we aint got any1 to score for everyone can see its got to be chief anf jackson in front of him,y carnt he see that?
Get the ball
Get in there area
Get a Goal
but we aint got any1 to score for everyone can see its got to be chief anf jackson in front of him,y carnt he see that?
i suport two teams CHESTERFIELD and watever team is playing mansfield
rico gone hubbard next please
rico gone hubbard next please
#16
Bob
- Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 449
- Joined: 06-June 05
Posted 03 March 2007 - 11:42 AM
I really cannot understand why the board do not get rid of Roy and Rico. they seem like the guy who fiddled whilst rome burnt.
They must be able to see the problem is that Roy has done nothing about sorting out our forward line all he does is get defenders in to solve the problem. Don't forget he also turned down a bid for Larkin just before the close season window closed and look at that for judgement!!
Do we have to be relegated before they do anything.
Bob
They must be able to see the problem is that Roy has done nothing about sorting out our forward line all he does is get defenders in to solve the problem. Don't forget he also turned down a bid for Larkin just before the close season window closed and look at that for judgement!!
Do we have to be relegated before they do anything.
Bob
#17
Dronny Spireite
- Youth Team Player
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 413
- Joined: 27-June 05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Dronfield
Posted 03 March 2007 - 12:15 PM
His excuse was that we failed to take our chances, weonly had 2!! larkin through on goal and bailey's 30 yarder
SPIREITE TILL I DIE
#18 Guest_spireiteblue_*
Posted 03 March 2007 - 12:44 PM
Bob, on Mar 3 2007, 11:42 AM, said:
I really cannot understand why the board do not get rid of Roy and Rico. they seem like the guy who fiddled whilst rome burnt.
They must be able to see the problem is that Roy has done nothing about sorting out our forward line all he does is get defenders in to solve the problem. Don't forget he also turned down a bid for Larkin just before the close season window closed and look at that for judgement!!
Do we have to be relegated before they do anything.
Bob
They must be able to see the problem is that Roy has done nothing about sorting out our forward line all he does is get defenders in to solve the problem. Don't forget he also turned down a bid for Larkin just before the close season window closed and look at that for judgement!!
Do we have to be relegated before they do anything.
Bob
The board should back him or sack him it is as simple as that but it is a bit late in the day to back him so they have to sack him and god help the next manager he will go the same way
#19
Scampi
- Reserve Team Player
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,053
- Joined: 21-September 06
- Gender:Male
- Location:Clowne
Posted 03 March 2007 - 12:49 PM
CFC Fan, on Mar 3 2007, 12:15 PM, said:
His excuse was that we failed to take our chances, weonly had 2!! larkin through on goal and bailey's 30 yarder
If Larkin had scored it would have changed the game to be fair it was a massive chance and it was inches from going in. You have to feel a bit sorry for Larkin because he really works hard for the team but he is not putting anything in the net. Last nights miss was bad, but some of the stick from the fans was worse. Its hardly going to give him confidence. What was with our fans arguing as well?
