Wonder what Roy's excuse is this week? Dread to think!
#1
Posted 02 March 2007 - 10:37 PM
#2
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:26 PM
Spireite-Karl, on Mar 2 2007, 10:37 PM, said:
we lost because our squad lacks depth and quality, and has done all season. i still think our saving grace will be 4 teams worse than us.
#4
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:35 PM
SpireiteDan, on Mar 2 2007, 11:29 PM, said:
cheltenham.
bournemouth.
millers.
then one from northampton/leyton o/ and bradford are new in the drop zone, and have lost the talisman windass.
seasons start i thought with the squad we had, and our "BREATHER" taking leaders, 5th bottom on GD would be our finish, and i stand by that prediction.
This post has been edited by death: 02 March 2007 - 11:37 PM
#5
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:35 PM
SpireiteDan, on Mar 2 2007, 11:29 PM, said:
well we'll soon find out
#6
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:37 PM
#7
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:39 PM
Spireite-Karl, on Mar 2 2007, 10:37 PM, said:
Silly defensive errors by individuals cost us
Can't plan againts that = management not to blame
#9
Posted 03 March 2007 - 01:19 AM
azul, on Mar 2 2007, 11:39 PM, said:
Can't plan againts that = management not to blame
Manager plays young inexperienced kid instead of Davies. We were shocking tonight and currently there aren't 4 teams worse than us.
If there is no new blood in next week we will probably go down.
#10
Posted 03 March 2007 - 09:38 AM
death, on Mar 2 2007, 11:35 PM, said:
bournemouth.
millers.
then one from northampton/leyton o/ and bradford are new in the drop zone, and have lost the talisman windass.
seasons start i thought with the squad we had, and our "BREATHER" taking leaders, 5th bottom on GD would be our finish, and i stand by that prediction.
theres one team worse than us and thats rotherham
#12
Posted 03 March 2007 - 09:51 AM
spireiteblue, on Mar 3 2007, 09:45 AM, said:
the football in this div is generally poor ,the difference between the teams at the top and bottom is simple the teams at the top can defend and score goals the teams like ourselves at the bottom cant do either
#13
Posted 03 March 2007 - 10:38 AM
azul, on Mar 2 2007, 11:39 PM, said:
Can't plan againts that = management not to blame
Manager picked Meredith to play in a difficult debut when perhaps not 90 mins match fit. Also persisted too long with 2 ineffective,inept strikers.
#14
Posted 03 March 2007 - 11:02 AM
#15
Posted 03 March 2007 - 11:20 AM
Get the ball
Get in there area
Get a Goal
but we aint got any1 to score for everyone can see its got to be chief anf jackson in front of him,y carnt he see that?
rico gone hubbard next please
#16
Posted 03 March 2007 - 11:42 AM
They must be able to see the problem is that Roy has done nothing about sorting out our forward line all he does is get defenders in to solve the problem. Don't forget he also turned down a bid for Larkin just before the close season window closed and look at that for judgement!!
Do we have to be relegated before they do anything.
Bob
#17
Posted 03 March 2007 - 12:15 PM
#18 Guest_spireiteblue_*
Posted 03 March 2007 - 12:44 PM
Bob, on Mar 3 2007, 11:42 AM, said:
They must be able to see the problem is that Roy has done nothing about sorting out our forward line all he does is get defenders in to solve the problem. Don't forget he also turned down a bid for Larkin just before the close season window closed and look at that for judgement!!
Do we have to be relegated before they do anything.
Bob
The board should back him or sack him it is as simple as that but it is a bit late in the day to back him so they have to sack him and god help the next manager he will go the same way
#19
Posted 03 March 2007 - 12:49 PM
CFC Fan, on Mar 3 2007, 12:15 PM, said:
If Larkin had scored it would have changed the game to be fair it was a massive chance and it was inches from going in. You have to feel a bit sorry for Larkin because he really works hard for the team but he is not putting anything in the net. Last nights miss was bad, but some of the stick from the fans was worse. Its hardly going to give him confidence. What was with our fans arguing as well?
#20
Posted 03 March 2007 - 02:02 PM