New Player
#1
Posted 21 January 2017 - 08:20 PM
SAVE A LIFE
#2
Posted 21 January 2017 - 08:25 PM
fishini, on 21 January 2017 - 08:20 PM, said:
Faded a little second half and a few too many flicks and farts still, but a very good performance in an unusual position for him, well done.
#3
Posted 21 January 2017 - 09:00 PM
fishini, on 21 January 2017 - 08:20 PM, said:
Yea I thought he was excellent although still has a tendency to play a silly ball in a silly position, if he cuts that out then there will be no stopping him. He actually looked like he prefered this position to being out wide.
I still think we tire early as a team - fitness needs to be worked on
#5
Posted 21 January 2017 - 10:00 PM
Radders, on 21 January 2017 - 09:00 PM, said:
I still think we tire early as a team - fitness needs to be worked on
Agree - the decline in work rate and sharpness was obvious within 15 minutes of the second half starting.
#6
Posted 21 January 2017 - 10:01 PM
fishini, on 21 January 2017 - 08:20 PM, said:
I agree Fish. Not under Cook, Saunders or Wilson can I say I've seen Dan play well for the full 90 minutes.
Love to Caldwell has sorted him in one and this is the start of something good.
#9
Posted 22 January 2017 - 08:02 AM
#10
Posted 22 January 2017 - 08:22 AM
#11
Posted 22 January 2017 - 09:53 AM
Westbars Spireite, on 22 January 2017 - 08:22 AM, said:
Do you think that might have been down to Gary Caldwell's analysis of how Wimbledon play so tactically felt Dan Gardner could do a good job there?
#12
Posted 22 January 2017 - 10:08 AM
dtp, on 22 January 2017 - 09:53 AM, said:
From his interview on peak I don't think it was tactically to do with Wimbledon more to do with caldwells assessment of gardners attributes
#13
Posted 22 January 2017 - 11:57 AM
sophocles, on 21 January 2017 - 10:00 PM, said:
New role new level of fitness required.Having said that the whole squad need to get back to a 90 minute plus game fitness/stamina levels.a la Cook era.
#14
Posted 22 January 2017 - 12:30 PM
BlueRover52, on 22 January 2017 - 11:57 AM, said:
Couldn't agree more. The fitness levels leave a lot to be desired. We seem to be suffering in this area ever since Mel was taken on board. Football requires a different type of fitness compared to the armed forces.
#15
Posted 22 January 2017 - 12:36 PM
dtp, on 22 January 2017 - 09:53 AM, said:
Sounds like Caldwell plans to develop him in hat position and that it isn't just a one off. It will be interesting to see what happens when he come up agaist a strong midfield
#16
Posted 22 January 2017 - 02:28 PM
firedodger, on 22 January 2017 - 10:08 AM, said:
How can Cauldwell know anyones attributes so new to the job,
#17
Posted 22 January 2017 - 02:30 PM
Dave In Footie Heaven, on 22 January 2017 - 02:28 PM, said:
Did his homework prior to taking over.
#18
Posted 22 January 2017 - 02:37 PM
Goku, on 22 January 2017 - 08:02 AM, said:
What i still find bewildering about Dan G is the fact hes coming up to 27 years old and yet struggles to play 90 minutes 3 years after we signed him
72+ points Play off's
83+ points Party Time
#19
Posted 22 January 2017 - 02:42 PM
#20
Posted 22 January 2017 - 02:47 PM
Exharboroughspireite, on 22 January 2017 - 02:42 PM, said:
Weren't O'Shea supposed to be up supporting evans? He just didn't have a very good game