Dancingwilldoit, on 01 December 2016 - 07:21 PM, said:
Yes but Walsall didn't build a new ground on 100% borrowed money selling their old ground when the market was rock bottom. How much do you think the interest payments are on the loaned money? I would think its in the region of 400-500k per year maybe more and that probably accounts for our losses. Its very easy to move that around in the accounts by not paying one year and put it back in when it suits.
Did we really need £200k to survive to the end of the year or have we seen a sleight of hand with a £200k input and nearly the same going back out to our lord and master in interest payments?
The land for the new stadium footprint was gifted, meanwhile the one point eight million (I think) shortfall on the Saltergate sale was announced some time before the eventual build.
We were told at the time that the figures stacked-up and most of the debt has accrued since, notably the million-plus loss despite record income.
Payments are indeed around half a million pounds, yet talent sales have recouped four times that over both the last two years only for CFC to barely break even.
The Walsall reference is to compare the performance of a club with similar facilities yet one that delivers superior results via an inferior turnover.
Perhaps the term 'sleight of hand' might be used to describe much of what's been happening on Sheff Road.
Just as the term 'delusional hubris' might be used to describe much of what was said at this so-called Q&A session.
This post has been edited by MDCCCLXVI: 01 December 2016 - 10:30 PM