[Snowflake McBedwetter]

DIFH, on 04 September 2023 - 04:49 PM, said:

You be the expert Mr Entertainment, what the hell is up with you. Is this board the only place you can have a view because the missus says it’s ok ?

NURRRRRSE....

[Cum on u blues]

60s 70s Spireite said:

1693833264[/url]' post='1768583']
I think Josh is great as the summariser- spots a change in formation and gives a good summary of recent significant play.
PT struggles with his flow, a lot of the time when he's having difficulty to name an opponent on the ball. I think he should sometimes just say 'a red shirt has it' or Josh be on name that player duty.
Or Josh and PT swop roles.

If JM takes over I might even log in even though I’ve subscribed to NL. Having said that I completely disagree that Jacobs was MOTM in the last game when both Colclough & Grimes were H&S above the rest

Maybe that’s why I prefer to watch the match after all…..

[Jud]

Cum on u blues, on 05 September 2023 - 07:07 PM, said:

Colclough & Grimes were H&S above the rest

Along with Mandy, they often are.

[frearsghost]

Perhaps two of the most whingeing, whining, biased commentators since Sheffield Utd.

[stokey]

Cheers Trig

[DerbySpireite59]

Quaker, on 07 September 2023 - 07:13 AM, said:

That commentary on Saturday was woeful, he was a proper mardbottom.

Phil does ok and he enjoys doing it, when he's away and Josh steps up I prefer his style of commentary but 1866 Sport is Phils baby I and its not something I think Phil would be happy to hand over. Having said that, I like Phil, I like his enthusiasm and his honesty.

We are blessed having our own independant radio commentary, I am not sure any other National League team have it or L2 for that matter.

Me too. The positives far outweigh the negatives imho.

[born in 1866]

DerbySpireite59, on 07 September 2023 - 08:37 AM, said:

Me too. The positives far outweigh the negatives imho.

Mine too. But if PT took on board constructive criticism that has been offered, it can only get better.

[dtp]

born in 1866, on 07 September 2023 - 08:52 AM, said:

Mine too. But if PT took on board constructive criticism that has been offered, it can only get better.

It would probably be better still if all these with superior knowledge giving constructive criticism would offer up their services to 1866 free of charge too.

Now, let's have a guess at the length of the queue.

[s42blue]

dtp, on 07 September 2023 - 11:26 AM, said:

It would probably be better still if all these with superior knowledge giving constructive criticism would offer up their services to 1866 free of charge too.

Now, let's have a guess at the length of the queue.

Nah sorry you can’t say that. Folk get the strop on…..

(Totally agree)

[born in 1866]

dtp, on 07 September 2023 - 11:26 AM, said:

It would probably be better still if all these with superior knowledge giving constructive criticism would offer up their services to 1866 free of charge too.

Now, let's have a guess at the length of the queue.

Stupid statement. 99.9% of us couldn't commentate for toffee. Having listened to dozens of commentators over the years it doesn't stop me from knowing good commentators from not so good.
So all those complaining about the awful Shots commentator can't complain unless they can commentate and offer their services for free?

[trickytrevsfanclub]

born in 1866, on 07 September 2023 - 03:05 PM, said:

Stupid statement. 99.9% of us couldn't commentate for toffee. Having listened to dozens of commentators over the years it doesn't stop me from knowing good commentators from not so good.
So all those complaining about the awful Shots commentator can't complain unless they can commentate and offer their services for free?

The reason for the awfulness of the shots commentator was him behaving like a toddler having a tantrum every time shots touched the ball, not his actual commentary of the passage of play.

[60s 70s Spireite]

dtp, on 07 September 2023 - 11:26 AM, said:

It would probably be better still if all these with superior knowledge giving constructive criticism would offer up their services to 1866 free of charge too.

Now, let's have a guess at the length of the queue.

Most of it is feedback not particularly criticism. I’m sure 1866 what that.

[RN Blue]

born in 1866, on 07 September 2023 - 03:05 PM, said:

Stupid statement. 99.9% of us couldn't commentate for toffee. Having listened to dozens of commentators over the years it doesn't stop me from knowing good commentators from not so good.
So all those complaining about the awful Shots commentator can't complain unless they can commentate and offer their services for free?

Nope. For one, it wasn't necessarily his commentary of the game that was the issue, it was his constant whining about things that didn't go the shots way and two what a nonsense statement that you can't complain about something unless you are prepared to do it yourself - flight is delayed, learn to be a pilot then, fuel prices are too high, go and prospect for oil then, food cold, learn to be a chef then etc.

[60s 70s Spireite]

60s70s Spireite, on 07 September 2023 - 05:21 PM, said:

Most of it is feedback not particularly criticism. I’m sure 1866 what that.

What want

[born in 1866]

RN Blue, on 07 September 2023 - 06:23 PM, said:

Nope. For one, it wasn't necessarily his commentary of the game that was the issue, it was his constant whining about things that didn't go the shots way and two what a nonsense statement that you can't complain about something unless you are prepared to do it yourself - flight is delayed, learn to be a pilot then, fuel prices are too high, go and prospect for oil then, food cold, learn to be a chef then etc.

Not really sure why you're explaining that to me. That was my point to dtp.

[RN Blue]

born in 1866, on 08 September 2023 - 08:36 AM, said:

Not really sure why you're explaining that to me. That was my point to dtp.

With you, missed the question mark on the end of your post, apologies.