[Misnomer]

calvin plummers socks, on 03 February 2023 - 09:45 AM, said:

You have issues son.

I’d happily discuss on DM - but I tried that before and you ignored.

Seems like everyone you disagree with has 'isuues'....how odd.

[calvin plummers socks]

Misnomer, on 03 February 2023 - 10:03 AM, said:

Seems like everyone you disagree with has 'isuues'....how odd.

Perhaps.
Maybe we’re all odd -posting stuff on a football team forum when we could all be out doing stuff

[calvin plummers socks]

Quaker, on 03 February 2023 - 10:24 AM, said:

Liar

Really?
18th Sept - a response to your somewhat unexpected abusive DM!

[calvin plummers socks]

Quaker, on 03 February 2023 - 10:39 AM, said:

I have two messages from you, one on 30 Aug and one 22 July. In one I answered I refered to you as a Prk as you were trying to belittle someone (as you always do). and the second time you asked me who rattled my cage as I had responded to one of your posts in defence of someone else. I again called you a prk and asked you to stop messaging me. I blocked you after that.

Wow

[Valley Blues]

calvin plummers socks, on 03 February 2023 - 11:50 AM, said:

Wow

You found my right wing posts yet, bruv, or are you going all shy on me again?

A simple apology for your completely uncalled for and false accusation against me or the evidence of it and I will gladly apologies to everyone I may have insulted and leave the board.

Can’t say fairer than that, surely.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Misnomer, on 02 February 2023 - 10:57 PM, said:

Who knew...you two just joust and cross swords at the písser. I honestly thought you saw him for what he is; one of the most arrogant, sanctimonious, ****s that I've ever come across. Some bald, ugly, no mark, that thinks he's Billy big balls. Thought he was something in his day but, just a complete coward of a man.

Same guy who openly called me a racist for suggesting KT had spat out his dummy, after being snubbed by Brum; only latterly to espouse the same view.

I said exactly the same things as our Stevie has said and, guess what...Snell calls me transphobic. Now look at him; licking her arsé, playing to the audience.

He never refers to the quoted material; simply offers trite, libelous and defamatory accusations. At least attack the text, dismantle the argument and give a reasoned retort. He's incapable of doing that.

Pitty, I honestly thought you were a guy of integrity. Seems like you see him as your Mr Grey.

Sooooo now you even sneer at the sight of contributors having friendly relationships?

Wow - that's a whole new level of, well, let's be generous and use the word 'troubled'.

Infact psycologists have a term for it - 'impotent rage'.

Y'know, describing tragic cases creating hate filled fantasy worlds for themsens 'cos they're just too damn inadequate to do owt else...

PS: can you tell us what the asterisked out word is? "Arrogant", "sanctimonious", "baldy", "ugly" and "no mark" got me the line at 'Misnomer bingo', so I might need whatever it is for the full house...

This post has been edited by The Earl of Chesterfield: 03 February 2023 - 06:26 PM

[s42blue]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 03 February 2023 - 06:24 PM, said:

Sooooo now you even sneer at the sight of contributors having friendly relationships?

Wow - that's a whole new level of, well, let's be generous and use the word 'troubled'.

Infact psycologists have a term for it - 'impotent rage'.

Y'know, describing tragic cases creating hate filled fantasy worlds for themsens 'cos they're just too damn inadequate to do owt else...

PS: can you tell us what the asterisked out word is? "Arrogant", "sanctimonious", "baldy", "ugly" and "no mark" got me the line at 'Misnomer bingo', so I might need whatever it is for the full house...

“Sweethearts?”

Though I think in the spirit of Roy Walker….”good answer…but it’s not right”

Adding to the lightness on a Friday night. All got a bit nasty. X

This post has been edited by s42blue: 03 February 2023 - 07:21 PM

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

s42blue, on 03 February 2023 - 06:32 PM, said:

“Sweethearts?”

Though I think I’m the spirit of Roy Walker….”good answer…but it’s not right”

Adding to the lightness on a Friday night. All got a bit nasty. X

I'm still puzzled by the "Billy big balls' reference.

How does he know....?

[Misnomer]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 03 February 2023 - 06:24 PM, said:

Sooooo now you even sneer at the sight of contributors having friendly relationships?

Wow - that's a whole new level of, well, let's be generous and use the word 'troubled'.

Infact psycologists have a term for it - 'impotent rage'.

Y'know, describing tragic cases creating hate filled fantasy worlds for themsens 'cos they're just too damn inadequate to do owt else...

PS: can you tell us what the asterisked out word is? "Arrogant", "sanctimonious", "baldy", "ugly" and "no mark" got me the line at 'Misnomer bingo', so I might need whatever it is for the full house...

I absolutely love to sneer; definitely a favourite past time of mine.

Oh my, I think I've had a little bit of pre drip out. I'm impressed, you 'might' have actually read something beyond the Labour party manifesto and Smug C*** weekly. Well done 👍🏻
Although, be honest; did you hear James O'Brien say it? You did, didn't you 🙄.....

Alas, I have to give you some credit. At least you haven't done your usual and played the victim card. Still, I'm sure it's at the ready.

That said, you still need to work on your humour.

Oh, one last thing. Do you know what psychologists call 'over compensating due to past beliefs and behaviours'? 🤔

I'd like to think you'd look it up and tell me but, I know you and I know you'll sidestep it. Guess what? I've done all the hard work for you:

Overcompensation - characterized by a superiority goal, leads to striving for power, dominance, self-esteem, and self-devaluation.

Sound familiar?

[s42blue]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 03 February 2023 - 06:59 PM, said:

I'm still puzzled by the "Billy big balls' reference.

How does he know....?

Now you’re overcompensating 😉

Edit: I didn’t see above. I was talking meat n two veg.

This post has been edited by s42blue: 03 February 2023 - 07:23 PM

[Misnomer]

s42blue, on 03 February 2023 - 07:16 PM, said:

Now you’re overcompensating 😉

A classic example of excellent humour. Can you ofer him a free tutorial....?

[s42blue]

Misnomer, on 03 February 2023 - 07:21 PM, said:

A classic example of excellent humour. Can you ofer him a free tutorial....?

I’m here all night.

Well until the pizza comes.

[Mr Mercury]

The thing that surprises me, when compared to George Floyd and his type of death, is how the reaction has been. That’s not trying to create a league table in how you die, but I think it’s a point.
Floyd died after being forcibly restrained by a single officer in a much discussed and over the top manner, and the resulting aftermath reverberated around the World, well to all parts of the Uk at least, probably due to the fact the officer was white and Floyd was black..
We then see Tyre Nichols bludgeoned to death, literally having the life thrashed from him by four, not one, but four police officers. And although there’s rightly demonstrations in America the rest of the World, well all parts of the Uk, seemingly says…well nothing..certainly the response on the streets in Uk is noticeably absent. Why is that when his death, or manner of death, is equally if not more abhorrent, than that of Floyds?
It reminds me of when the UK female black activist was shot in the head in London last year, there was absolute uproar it was all over the media and all news outlets with demonstrations a plenty, it was major, major news. Then, when a few days later, it came to light that she was shot by a group of black youths in a gang related attack, suddenly silence, it was though a media blackout had been imposed.
Apologies for the lateness of reply to the thread but I was recovering from my first glider flight!

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 03 February 2023 - 09:18 PM