[mr. smith]

h again, on May 23 2007, 08:52 PM, said:

Regardless of who the two higher placed clubs are, third out of 92 clubs is an extremely impressive performance, wouldn't you agree?
Argument for argument's sake has obviously appealed to you in the end. Congratulations on taking my advice - we just need to work on the silly lols and you might yet become coherent.

no. we've just been relegated to the bottom division, whats impressive about that?

[h again]

Town_Fan, on May 24 2007, 12:36 AM, said:

Captain spin on the case again. You know that wasnt what I said.

We'll let the other readers draw their own conclusions, shall we? One thing's for certain - anything that reflects favourably on CFC is going to get you denying it.

[mr. smith]

h again, on May 23 2007, 11:44 PM, said:

We'll let the other readers draw their own conclusions, shall we? One thing's for certain - anything that reflects favourably on CFC is going to get you denying it.

problem is h that the table doesnt reflect favourably on us. scunny & colchester must have worst % than us to finish in 1st & 2nd. ones been promoted to the championship as league1 champions & the other flirted with play off contention for the premiership. us? we got relegated to the bottom division. stats can prove anything you want really as theyre subjective. you say its great weve done so well with small finances & theres an arguement for that viewpoint equally if you look at scunny & col.u the lack of finance arguement is overcome.

[Wooden Spoon]

h again, on May 24 2007, 12:39 AM, said:

No grasping at straws involved, old skeletal chum. Just a statistic that illustrates a point - for a club with our small gates we have done uncommonly well in the past.

and this season? the one currently being `debated`? i wouldnt say we have done uncommonly well(the league table agrees), would you?

This post has been edited by death: 24 May 2007 - 04:11 AM

[Westbars Spireite]

lesleycfc, on May 22 2007, 06:50 PM, said:

Well thats different people do have personal circumstances. What happened to your roof? You damage it trying to jump off it after 23 matches of tripe last year at home!

There times I glady would have but buying a house built in 1896 has its downsides!

[Middle East]

Just got back from my 2 week hols to find that unlike a few on here I HAVE recieved my season ticket re-newal form which considering that i e-mailed the club telling them to not bother and save themselves the price of a stamp has really brassed me off!

Given Hubbards ludicrous decision not to mention the stupid timing of announcing Rico as the permanant manage i swore i wasn't having a season ticket this time and i'm not.

I did however naievely think that on my return that there minght have been some interesting/exciting signings which could possibly make me think again. Fat chance!

[Eddie63]

h again, on May 23 2007, 09:52 PM, said:

Regardless of who the two higher placed clubs are, third out of 92 clubs is an extremely impressive performance, wouldn't you agree?
Argument for argument's sake has obviously appealed to you in the end. Congratulations on taking my advice - we just need to work on the silly lols and you might yet become coherent.

I think that our crowds are much higher than our actual level of support because of the mileage chart thing mentioned on another post.Our lacation means that we have more local games and much less distance for many fans to travel to away games against us.

[fishini]

h again, on May 24 2007, 12:39 AM, said:

No grasping at straws involved, old skeletal chum. Just a statistic that illustrates a point - for a club with our small gates we have done uncommonly well in the past. You can choose to ignore it, or spin something different along with your strange friend, but the fact remains that we are utilising our slender resources extremely well.
I always find it funny, the lengths TF will go to in order to denigrate the club he allegedly supports. I hope the two of you will be very happy together.

When have we ever done uncommonly well?