My first impressions
#1
Posted 22 August 2009 - 06:29 PM
So I will say alright so far but work still needs doing if we are to challenge for promotion
SAVE A LIFE
#2
Posted 22 August 2009 - 06:33 PM
fishini, on Aug 22 2009, 07:42 PM, said:
So I will say alright so far but work still needs doing if we are to challenge for promotion
Good post fish, most of which i will agree with although i think you are slightly harsh on Jack in saying he looks disinterested - that's not the impression i carried away with me on Weds, although i haven't been today. I would say that so far he lacks a sharpness he's shown previously.
#3 Guest_Dema Reborn_*
Posted 22 August 2009 - 06:38 PM
Bankrobber, on Aug 22 2009, 07:46 PM, said:
Jack will come good and get the goals,i am glad others are scoring though......
#4
Posted 22 August 2009 - 06:40 PM
Bankrobber, on Aug 22 2009, 07:46 PM, said:
You have to ask why? Could the Notts County offer have upset him more than we think? I realise the offer to the club was an insult but you have to wonder what they offered him. It was maybe just something they did to unsettle him. could it have worked?
SAVE A LIFE
#5
Posted 22 August 2009 - 06:51 PM
fishini, on Aug 22 2009, 07:53 PM, said:
Possibly...although like i say he looked determined to prove a point the other night. Makes you wonder whether that was because of the opposition though.
I'm sure everyone is behind Jack and can't wait for him to be back on the scoresheet. It's a long way off yet, but if he could get 100 goals for Town, what an achievement that would be.
#6
Posted 22 August 2009 - 06:56 PM
fishini, on Aug 22 2009, 07:53 PM, said:
He looked interested enough today as he did against county. Saying, almost evertthing he touched today in the seconf half turned to Bunkum. Donal was another one.
How long is it going to take Sheriden to realise where Talbot should be playing. No substitutions when clearly we were wilting Some players not getting a chance.
Sounds like Rico's epithaph
#7
Posted 22 August 2009 - 06:58 PM
#8
Posted 22 August 2009 - 07:02 PM
On the evidence so far, Sheridan’s tactics have seen us being more controlled but at the same time still attack minded. The chances created suggest it is only a matter of time before Sir Jack is amongst the goals again.
Jack’s performances this season have been generally good and the only thing missing are the goals.
#9
Posted 22 August 2009 - 07:08 PM
Skywalker, on Aug 22 2009, 08:15 PM, said:
On the evidence so far, Sheridan’s tactics have seen us being more controlled but at the same time still attack minded. The chances created suggest it is only a matter of time before Sir Jack is amongst the goals again.
Jack’s performances this season have been generally good and the only thing missing are the goals.
No panic guaranteed 20 plus, he needs someone in the midle with him to play off
#10
Posted 22 August 2009 - 07:13 PM
fishini, on Aug 22 2009, 07:42 PM, said:
I wouldn't normally be bothered to respond, but in the two matches you have seen, Jack has laid on 2 winning goals and was far from disinterested. Maybe the reason you don't know why is that you can't work it out.
#11
Posted 22 August 2009 - 07:16 PM
dim view, on Aug 22 2009, 08:26 PM, said:
Sorry I forgot to put my opinions through your opinion filter. I will do so next time if I remember
SAVE A LIFE
#12
Posted 22 August 2009 - 07:27 PM
dim view, on Aug 22 2009, 08:26 PM, said:
Today we looked to have an hang over from the midweek game, 1 day less than Shrews to recover. Very open game second half anyone could have won it.
We are desperate for someone up front to finish the approach play. McDermott hardly in thr game.
Big Kev way out of position for their goal.
Tommy saved us again. Why no subs when we were so tired in obvious positions.
#13 Guest_djs_*
Posted 22 August 2009 - 07:29 PM
dim view, on Aug 22 2009, 08:26 PM, said:
Two terrific games, two indifferent, we're finding it hard to score although we seem to be creating alot of chances. We're play a whole lot better football this year........ 10 games into the season would be a good time to give a fairer judgement.
Just one other thing, Jack was excellent against County and he set us on our way in getting the first penalty. I think he was the only player in our squad who could have drawn the foul to get the spot kick, most players would have come inside. He will come good for us again and I expect between 15 and 20 goals from him this season.
#14
Posted 22 August 2009 - 07:30 PM
Ernie Ernie Ernie, on Aug 22 2009, 08:21 PM, said:
I know it's a dirty word but he seemed to enjoy playing with Gritten when we had width last season. Of course all we need is width!
#15 Guest_djs_*
Posted 22 August 2009 - 07:39 PM
azul, on Aug 22 2009, 08:43 PM, said:
Right then rest Donaldo play Drew wide left and Gritts at the side of Jack......... Actually thats not a bad idea. Then bring Donal on for the last 30mins
#16
Posted 22 August 2009 - 07:40 PM
azul, on Aug 22 2009, 08:43 PM, said:
It's far too early to discount his partnership with Drew. We are 3 unbeaten, Drew has got us 2 penalties, and both Jack and Drew have missed easy chances. Their combined effect might just be the reason why Lowry is playing so much better. My game plan is just to chill out for about 10 games.
#17
Posted 23 August 2009 - 07:05 AM
Dave In Footie Heaven, on Aug 22 2009, 08:40 PM, said:
We are desperate for someone up front to finish the approach play. McDermott hardly in thr game.
Big Kev way out of position for their goal.
Tommy saved us again. Why no subs when we were so tired in obvious positions.
I know they`re proffessional atheletes etc, but I feel that was a major point Yesterday. We have played 3 high tempo games on three very hot days and it showed yesterday..That extra day off for the shrews could well have got them all 3 points,..
BIN THE WEDNESDAY NIGHT GAMES
#18 Guest_djs_*
Posted 23 August 2009 - 09:17 AM
Dave In Footie Heaven, on Aug 22 2009, 08:40 PM, said:
We are desperate for someone up front to finish the approach play. McDermott hardly in thr game.
Big Kev way out of position for their goal.
Tommy saved us again. Why no subs when we were so tired in obvious positions.
It did'nt effect County....... Should'nt have been a problem!
#19
Posted 23 August 2009 - 09:51 AM
djs, on Aug 23 2009, 10:30 AM, said:
What a reply, what bearing does that reply have in respect of our performance. Total insignificant.
#20 Guest_Mark Jones_*
Posted 23 August 2009 - 10:37 AM
fishini, on Aug 22 2009, 07:53 PM, said:
They can't offer him anything, he is under contract with us. They made the club an offer, it was declined, they made no offer to Jack Lester at all. Its illegal.
This post has been edited by Mark Jones: 23 August 2009 - 10:37 AM