Bob's Board: Misnomer - Viewing Profile - Bob's Board

Jump to content

Misnomer's Profile User Rating: *----

Reputation: 188 Excellent
Group:
Members
Active Posts:
8,022 (1.39 per day)
Most Active In:
Spireite Debate (4923 posts)
Joined:
30-August 08
Profile Views:
1,789
Last Active:
User is offline Today, 10:15 AM
Currently:
Offline

My Information

Member Title:
Key Player
Age:
Age Unknown
Birthday:
Birthday Unknown
Gender:
Male Male
Location:
Brampton

Contact Information

E-mail:
Click here to e-mail me

Latest Visitors

Posts I've Made

  1. In Topic: D Day

    Today, 10:15 AM

     s42blue, on 09 June 2024 - 08:24 AM, said:

    Thread ruined. Disrespectful from the usual suspects.


    Whilst you might consider this board to be the only place to express your private and personal thoughts, I don't. I've shown my respects, elsewhere, thank you. My grandad fought in WWII and had his foot blown off.

    You may have noticed, this board's personal section isn't what folk consider to be immune from vileness being slung from all corners, no matter what the topic. What's been said so far is extremely mild and doesn't take anything away from the substance of the topic. In fact, I'd argue that Khan has shown more disrespect to our heroes than anything I've seen from the 'usual suspects' on here, and it's certainly pertinent to the topic.
  2. In Topic: Artificial Weather

    Today, 10:02 AM

     isleaiw1, on 09 June 2024 - 09:03 AM, said:

    Because I only wanted to know an answer to that bit, generally dont read your posts but intrigued by your comments on the data... as an academic isnt the view that a hypothesis can be proven or unproven by data but no data seen doesnt mean its not true?


    That's nice of you, Ian...you don't read them; yet, from the written word, which carries zero intonation, you've chosen to infer my character as being 'angry'. There really is no depth to your capabilities.

    As I've said, you can present data however you want, it doesn't mean it's truly representative of results.

    The BBC horrified a nation with their data presentation ref COVID; they've subsequently been reprimanded for doing so. The government run organisation decided to show ABC, they chose to omit XYZ.

    Big pharma is well known for dumping multiple studies on medicines that achieve negative outcomes, but the one that shows a positive correlation is presented as THE outcome.

    You can twist and present data however you want, but you can't fake methodologies... because they have to be able to be replicated, over and over.

    Transparency is everything....
  3. In Topic: D Day

    Today, 08:20 AM

     calvin plummers socks, on 08 June 2024 - 11:29 PM, said:

    We should share a milkshake at some beverage store - that would be lovely


    Love to....Do you think you'd be able read the menu or will your mum be coming with you?
  4. In Topic: Artificial Weather

    Today, 08:16 AM

     isleaiw1, on 08 June 2024 - 09:18 PM, said:

    On the name change, see this...

    https://science.nasa...global-warming/

    On the data, are you saying you have seen the data and disagree with the findings, or you havent seen the data and how it was collected and therefore refuse to believe it? Pretty sure if its the latter the data around the arctic circle ice levels could be found in an academic study on line if you wanted to see it...

    Some would say of course that without the data you cant disagree, you can only say you dont know... unless of course you dont really need data to reach your conclusions?


    Shall I repeat everything I wrote? You've decided to swerve past a huge chunk of it....
  5. In Topic: England Squad.

    Yesterday, 09:02 PM

     Mr Mercury, on 08 June 2024 - 08:36 PM, said:

    Agree with all that apart from the 5-1 win over there was a qualifier wasn?t it?


    Apologies, Merc...it was a qualifier.

Comments

Misnomer has no profile comments yet. Why not say hello?