Concerning
#21
Posted 09 January 2024 - 07:49 PM
Laden with doom when we are on a roll.
To clever to be from North Notts a Sheffielder maybe? Or just bitter?.
One thing he/she is guaranteed a reaction on here.
Maybe we should have kept David and gone even further down the leagues.....
#22
Posted 09 January 2024 - 07:51 PM
60s 70s Spireite, on 09 January 2024 - 07:45 PM, said:
Specifically you have ignored the £1.1M from TV and central funds we will receive in League 2. Gate income will be much higher this season, and then next, especially with much larger away followings. Moreover the 50% rule is for Player related expenditure, our £3M was all wages, including pay offs for previous managers.
Kieran Maguire of course says virtually every EFL club is a loss of a backer away from financial ruin, so nothing new to see there.
There's no problem with the amortisation of players - we were over prudent so no issue using the standard method. The rule has been brought in to stop clubs under amortising. Plus of course the sale of Kabby will be all profit in the accounts.
As for the football, stick to game by game, cos from what we've seen in our games v League One and Two teams over the last 2 seasons, we have nothing to worry about.
More importantly, what's your post all about? Which club do you support? Sheffield Wednesday.
#23
Posted 09 January 2024 - 07:52 PM
Laden with doom when we are on a roll.
To clever to be from North Notts a Sheffielder maybe? Or just bitter?.
One thing he/she is guaranteed a reaction on here.
Maybe we should have kept David and gone even further down the leagues.....
#24
Posted 09 January 2024 - 07:53 PM
Like I’ve said on several occasions thank goodness for the Kirk’s investment because otherwise we’d be another ex-EFL casualty doomed to stay in the NL indefinitely. Wrexham and NC are recent examples of how to get out.
High attendances alone don’t balance the books either. At some point we need to say STOP. Anyone with any sense will understand that ex-EFL players don’t drop to the NL on the basis of PC’s charisma alone….
Yes promotion is the most important goal this season but assuming we’re there next year we can’t continue to rely on benefactors to keep this club afloat and go further on the current policy.
The Kirks have done a great job but they’re not Hollywood actors.
Gordon made a good point about teams like Brighton, Brentford etc. The key is to develop the youth team and sell them on at a profit. I can’t think of a better example than Brighton in terms of maximizing both aspects. This should be the model we develop if we’ve got the ambition to go higher.
#26
Posted 09 January 2024 - 07:54 PM
1866_Spireite_14, on 09 January 2024 - 06:44 PM, said:
Furthermore, the £2,366,217 loss we had in the previous accounts is concerning. Why are we spending so much and planning on spending when we are losing so much money? The spending is unsustainable. Why do we need to rip up the pitch at the end of the season and get a new one? At the end of the Bromley game in the playoffs I got a close up look at the pitch and it was a carpet. At the moment WE ARE A NON LEAGUE CLUB, we don’t need to get a brand new pitch every season. Now I understand that our training facilities were in need of an upgrade, but what did we get for the £300,000 we spent on the training ground? By the looks of it it was even more money spent on the pitch with some nets around the pitches. On the podcast it was mentioned that the pitches are of a similar quality to St Georges Park. Realistically, we don’t need to have a pitch that is a similar quality to the national team when we are just a non league club at he moment.
When is the spending going to slow down. Are we going to spend even more next year and get into more and more debt. What happens in the worst case scenario and the trust and Kirk brothers can’t keep subsiding these losses. Whose going to pay off these debts when Derby County, who are a significantly bigger club with a vastly bigger fanbase, struggled to attract any buyers. Football finance expert Kieran Maguire has inferred that the club are spending beyond their means on his podcast, which adds to my concerns.
Moving onto next season when we have successfully bought our way into League 2. Are the club aware of the Financial Fair Play Rules in place. Clubs in League 2 are only allowed to spend 50% of their income on their team and before we bring up Wrexham, they have a number of significant sponsorship deals, which keep them within FFP rules. Looking at our most recent accounts, our total turnover was £3,928,008, whereas we spent around £3,000,000 on wages. While we will be getting more from our crowds, we have also added players such as Will Grigg and Tom Naylor, who will be on very good wages. It would not surprise me if Will Grigg is on a league 1 or good league 2 wage, while according to sources Tom Naylor was supposed to sign with Derby County, until the EFL rejected his registration due to his offered wages supposedly surpassing the £5,000 per week salary cap they were put under. Realistically, would a player of Naylor’s quality drop a number of divisions for a pay cut? I doubt it, although I may be wrong. How much will be able to spend next season when we are to close to the FFP rules. We may have to lose players in order to bring them in and even then we don't have any players of significant value in reality. For example, we'd be lucky to get £50K for Dobra at the moment.
Additionally, are the club aware of how the clubs new amortisation policy breaks EFL rules. To put it simply, the EFL requires clubs to break down the transfer fees evenly over the course of their contract. For example, if Player A signs for £500,000 on a 5 year contract. Each year £100,000 would be put down in the club’s accounts. I’m sure Mike Goodwin or someone else at the mentioned at the last AGM that the club write transfer fees off straight away, which is a breach of EFL rules. It would be a disaster if we start League 2 next season with a 9 point deduction (the penalty applied for this breach of rules.) In addition, the EFL have set the precedent that clubs are allowed to claim compensation if they are negatively impacted by a club breaking these rules, which we have appeared to do.
Now onto my concern with the playing side of things. Quite simply I believe that some of our forwards our carrying a lot of players in the squad. Defensively we are to prone to mistakes and gifting goals and opportunities to our opposition. In my opinion we don’t have a League 2 standard central defender at the club. Once we start playing week in week out against better opposition Jamie Grimes is going to be found out big time. He is far to slow and not good enough with his feet, like a number of our defenders. I can’t understand the hype around him. He’s very good in the air and is a leader, but that’s about it. As a unit how many of the goals we have conceded come from through balls over the top of our defence. The answer …. Far too many.
In attack, we are as near to unstoppable as any team has ever been in this division. However, that is due to how many chances we get, which is a positive. However, we are nowhere near clinical enough to go up the leagues like some are talking about. We are almost guaranteed to get at least 2 goals a game, where one of our players receives the ball in the 18 yard box with no-one within 3 or 4 yards of him, which could be put away by most people watching from the stands. We definitely won't be getting as many of these chances next season. We also miss loads of chances. How many times do we get in a good position only for us to completely miss the target.
In my opinion, the only players we have who could push us to the top half of league 2 are Tom Naylor, James Berry and potentially Jacobs, Colclough and Quigley. Ryan Boot could be a solid option in goal as well. But, our top scorer this season in Grigg has proved that he is not a prolific EFL goalscorer. Since he scored 19 goals in 43 games during the 2017/18 season; he scored 30 in 176 (Around 1 every 6 games). And if National League teams are finding ways of beating our defence, League 2 teams will follow.
We aren’t going to be getting any players from the youth team make a significant impact in our first team any time soon. The fans who are claiming they are fantastic are quite frankly deluded. While it was a good win in the FA Trophy, most of the team that day were 1st teamers and more youngsters were brought on as the lead got bigger. When they were left to themselves in the Derbyshire Senior Cup the youngsters were beaten comfortably by a Long Eaton United team who were without a win around 25 games in the Southern League Central. The players on loan at Matlock Town are struggling to break into a struggling Northern Premier League team and when they do play they look just as poor as the test of the team.
I’ve just read this again. What a crock.
#27
Posted 09 January 2024 - 07:54 PM
#28
Posted 09 January 2024 - 07:55 PM
tomjoad, on 09 January 2024 - 07:49 PM, said:
Laden with doom when we are on a roll.
To clever to be from North Notts a Sheffielder maybe? Or just bitter?.
One thing he/she is guaranteed a reaction on here.
Maybe we should have kept David and gone even further down the leagues.....
Even Sheffield both teams fans are praising us, especially the ones where I work so I doubt it's one of theirs unless it is the Sockpuppet trying to stir things, if it is he can fornicate off. More likely it's a six-fingered idiot from the wrong side of the M1 getting nervous as we could be coming up against them next season unless they pull off a miracle and go against type and go up themselves.
#29
Posted 09 January 2024 - 07:58 PM
1866_Spireite_14, on 09 January 2024 - 06:44 PM, said:
Furthermore, the £2,366,217 loss we had in the previous accounts is concerning. Why are we spending so much and planning on spending when we are losing so much money? The spending is unsustainable. Why do we need to rip up the pitch at the end of the season and get a new one? At the end of the Bromley game in the playoffs I got a close up look at the pitch and it was a carpet. At the moment WE ARE A NON LEAGUE CLUB, we don’t need to get a brand new pitch every season. Now I understand that our training facilities were in need of an upgrade, but what did we get for the £300,000 we spent on the training ground? By the looks of it it was even more money spent on the pitch with some nets around the pitches. On the podcast it was mentioned that the pitches are of a similar quality to St Georges Park. Realistically, we don’t need to have a pitch that is a similar quality to the national team when we are just a non league club at he moment.
When is the spending going to slow down. Are we going to spend even more next year and get into more and more debt. What happens in the worst case scenario and the trust and Kirk brothers can’t keep subsiding these losses. Whose going to pay off these debts when Derby County, who are a significantly bigger club with a vastly bigger fanbase, struggled to attract any buyers. Football finance expert Kieran Maguire has inferred that the club are spending beyond their means on his podcast, which adds to my concerns.
Moving onto next season when we have successfully bought our way into League 2. Are the club aware of the Financial Fair Play Rules in place. Clubs in League 2 are only allowed to spend 50% of their income on their team and before we bring up Wrexham, they have a number of significant sponsorship deals, which keep them within FFP rules. Looking at our most recent accounts, our total turnover was £3,928,008, whereas we spent around £3,000,000 on wages. While we will be getting more from our crowds, we have also added players such as Will Grigg and Tom Naylor, who will be on very good wages. It would not surprise me if Will Grigg is on a league 1 or good league 2 wage, while according to sources Tom Naylor was supposed to sign with Derby County, until the EFL rejected his registration due to his offered wages supposedly surpassing the £5,000 per week salary cap they were put under. Realistically, would a player of Naylor’s quality drop a number of divisions for a pay cut? I doubt it, although I may be wrong. How much will be able to spend next season when we are to close to the FFP rules. We may have to lose players in order to bring them in and even then we don't have any players of significant value in reality. For example, we'd be lucky to get £50K for Dobra at the moment.
Additionally, are the club aware of how the clubs new amortisation policy breaks EFL rules. To put it simply, the EFL requires clubs to break down the transfer fees evenly over the course of their contract. For example, if Player A signs for £500,000 on a 5 year contract. Each year £100,000 would be put down in the club’s accounts. I’m sure Mike Goodwin or someone else at the mentioned at the last AGM that the club write transfer fees off straight away, which is a breach of EFL rules. It would be a disaster if we start League 2 next season with a 9 point deduction (the penalty applied for this breach of rules.) In addition, the EFL have set the precedent that clubs are allowed to claim compensation if they are negatively impacted by a club breaking these rules, which we have appeared to do.
Now onto my concern with the playing side of things. Quite simply I believe that some of our forwards our carrying a lot of players in the squad. Defensively we are to prone to mistakes and gifting goals and opportunities to our opposition. In my opinion we don’t have a League 2 standard central defender at the club. Once we start playing week in week out against better opposition Jamie Grimes is going to be found out big time. He is far to slow and not good enough with his feet, like a number of our defenders. I can’t understand the hype around him. He’s very good in the air and is a leader, but that’s about it. As a unit how many of the goals we have conceded come from through balls over the top of our defence. The answer …. Far too many.
In attack, we are as near to unstoppable as any team has ever been in this division. However, that is due to how many chances we get, which is a positive. However, we are nowhere near clinical enough to go up the leagues like some are talking about. We are almost guaranteed to get at least 2 goals a game, where one of our players receives the ball in the 18 yard box with no-one within 3 or 4 yards of him, which could be put away by most people watching from the stands. We definitely won't be getting as many of these chances next season. We also miss loads of chances. How many times do we get in a good position only for us to completely miss the target.
In my opinion, the only players we have who could push us to the top half of league 2 are Tom Naylor, James Berry and potentially Jacobs, Colclough and Quigley. Ryan Boot could be a solid option in goal as well. But, our top scorer this season in Grigg has proved that he is not a prolific EFL goalscorer. Since he scored 19 goals in 43 games during the 2017/18 season; he scored 30 in 176 (Around 1 every 6 games). And if National League teams are finding ways of beating our defence, League 2 teams will follow.
We aren’t going to be getting any players from the youth team make a significant impact in our first team any time soon. The fans who are claiming they are fantastic are quite frankly deluded. While it was a good win in the FA Trophy, most of the team that day were 1st teamers and more youngsters were brought on as the lead got bigger. When they were left to themselves in the Derbyshire Senior Cup the youngsters were beaten comfortably by a Long Eaton United team who were without a win around 25 games in the Southern League Central. The players on loan at Matlock Town are struggling to break into a struggling Northern Premier League team and when they do play they look just as poor as the test of the team.
😆😆😆, do you really think that two life long supporters, who just happen to be very successful businessmen are going to run the club into the ground 🤔. This is so 22 carat it should be hallmarked.
#30
Posted 09 January 2024 - 08:01 PM
#32
Posted 09 January 2024 - 08:04 PM
Johnnyspireite7, on 09 January 2024 - 07:55 PM, said:
Can’t be a stag. The sentence constructions are too complex.
#33
Posted 09 January 2024 - 08:05 PM
Cum on u blues, on 09 January 2024 - 07:53 PM, said:
Like I’ve said on several occasions thank goodness for the Kirk’s investment because otherwise we’d be another ex-EFL casualty doomed to stay in the NL indefinitely. Wrexham and NC are recent examples of how to get out.
High attendances alone don’t balance the books either. At some point we need to say STOP. Anyone with any sense will understand that ex-EFL players don’t drop to the NL on the basis of PC’s charisma alone….
Yes promotion is the most important goal this season but assuming we’re there next year we can’t continue to rely on benefactors to keep this club afloat and go further on the current policy.
The Kirks have done a great job but they’re not Hollywood actors.
Gordon made a good point about teams like Brighton, Brentford etc. The key is to develop the youth team and sell them on at a profit. I can’t think of a better example than Brighton in terms of maximizing both aspects. This should be the model we develop if we’ve got the ambition to go higher.
Brighton, Brentford? Jeez, they’ve been financed to the tune of over £450M for the former, and over £100M of owner investment for the latter to get into the PL. Yes, 2 decent football models, but ones way beyond us. Someone will be saying Bournemouth next.
Some far better and more realistic models out there. Ours might just be the next one. I
Unfortunately all football clubs rely on benefactors. I suggest you take a look at Bromley’s accounts- losses of £800k pa in the last two years.
#37
Posted 09 January 2024 - 08:10 PM
#38
Posted 09 January 2024 - 08:13 PM
A few words are springing to mind, jealousy, fool, red wine, Scunthorpe(shortened works better)
#40
Posted 09 January 2024 - 08:14 PM
Yorkshire is Yorkshire
Never the twain shall meet.
Again