Derbyshire Times Latest
#481
Posted 16 May 2016 - 09:20 AM
http://www.derbyshir...novak-1-7913311
#483
Posted 17 May 2016 - 07:36 AM
RGS, on 16 May 2016 - 09:20 AM, said:
http://www.derbyshir...novak-1-7913311
Reasonably promising.
#484
Posted 17 May 2016 - 10:48 AM
#486
Posted 17 May 2016 - 12:02 PM
Westbars Spireite, on 17 May 2016 - 11:16 AM, said:
No comment 😮
#488
Posted 17 May 2016 - 12:20 PM
Westbars Spireite said:
I would expect a two work response if he was.
Root vegetable?
#489
Posted 17 May 2016 - 12:56 PM
#490
Posted 17 May 2016 - 12:57 PM
Johnnyspireite7 said:
Foreign Office!
Clucking Bell?
#491
Posted 17 May 2016 - 02:32 PM
http://www.derbyshir...goals-1-7916426
#492
Posted 17 May 2016 - 06:36 PM
However the genuine investigative journalism currently being pursued alongside the depth and quality of content on the sports pages deserves the support of every Chesterfield fan.
Well done to all involved and keep up the good work!
#493
Posted 17 May 2016 - 07:21 PM
MDCCCLXVI, on 17 May 2016 - 06:36 PM, said:
However the genuine investigative journalism currently being pursued alongside the depth and quality of content on the sports pages deserves the support of every Chesterfield fan.
Well done to all involved and keep up the good work!
Have you bought a copy?
#494
Posted 17 May 2016 - 07:34 PM
Westbars Spireite, on 17 May 2016 - 07:21 PM, said:
Trouble is all the good stuff is online and not in hardcopy
That's the way things are going everywhere, you either put up with the adevets or be prepared to subscribe
#495
Posted 17 May 2016 - 08:49 PM
azul, on 17 May 2016 - 07:34 PM, said:
That's the way things are going everywhere, you either put up with the adevets or be prepared to subscribe
The only thing that doesn't end up on Twitter/Facebook days before is the head and shoulders (and that's probably online too).
#499
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:19 AM
moondog, on 17 May 2016 - 10:48 AM, said:
I'm disappointed at not getting a reply to what for me is the key question. Is the way the PPP is being run is all behind his back, does he condone it or does he think it's none of his business?
Time for more than an unmamed spokesperson comments me thinks
#500
Posted 18 May 2016 - 01:24 PM
moondog, on 18 May 2016 - 11:19 AM, said:
Time for more than an unmamed spokesperson comments me thinks
A key point.