Do We Really Want To Be Associated With This Questionable Enterprise.
#4561
Posted 25 July 2017 - 12:40 PM
#4562
Posted 25 July 2017 - 12:45 PM
Blue5, on 25 July 2017 - 12:40 PM, said:
Ashley said he'd given Sutcliffe a substantial amount which he now wants back off Turner. I don't think he would ever respond to a request to prove it.
#4563
Posted 25 July 2017 - 03:39 PM
#4564
Posted 25 July 2017 - 04:02 PM
MDCCCLXVI, on 25 July 2017 - 03:39 PM, said:
Not usually only creditors, there was a £7.5k third party payment to cover liquidator costs, that may be what is being talked about, latest statement of affairs from liquidators available on companies house attached. Mods I assume as this is in the public domain it is ok to share?
Cheers
Attached File(s)
-
application-pdf(20).pdf (80.21K)
Number of downloads: 80
This post has been edited by ingo bingo: 25 July 2017 - 04:05 PM
#4565
Posted 25 July 2017 - 04:16 PM
ingo bingo, on 25 July 2017 - 04:02 PM, said:
Cheers
Just a mere 1/4 million in debts then ?
#4566
Posted 25 July 2017 - 04:18 PM
The loans that both AC & CT made to the DC should have been recorded in the state of affairs and should have been included in the summary, unless they were personal loans to LS.
Z
As an add-on, the garage that serviced the Ford Transit minibus has not been included within the debtors list but is still running round and being used by the FBT at the village. The vehicle had not changed hands since it was purchased (which I believe was sorted by an ex-employer of CFC on behalf of the DC). I think Mr Plod should pull the vehicle and check the registration documents and insurance details with a view to checking the M.O.T history & strict checks that a vehicle of this type and with the usage it is supposed to be registered and declared. Hmmm
This post has been edited by Zorro: 25 July 2017 - 04:27 PM
#4567
Posted 25 July 2017 - 04:32 PM
#4568
Posted 25 July 2017 - 06:13 PM
MDCCCLXVI, on 25 July 2017 - 04:32 PM, said:
Perhaps it was Liam's wifes great friend Tony ?
#4569
Posted 27 July 2017 - 06:14 PM
Infact they seemed surprised at the suggestion he'd ever been away.
#4572
Posted 27 July 2017 - 07:29 PM
Self Preservation 1 V Chesterfield FC and its Supporters 0.
#4573
Posted 28 July 2017 - 06:10 AM
#4574
Posted 28 July 2017 - 06:37 AM
ingo bingo, on 25 July 2017 - 04:02 PM, said:
Cheers
Just to point out, the first Liquidators statement of affairs (which you have referred to) was reported here contemporaneously back in March; worth a catch up to see comments at the time http://www.thecfss.c...dpost&p=1285832
We eagerly await the Liquidator's report due by 1 September.
#4575
Posted 28 July 2017 - 07:25 AM
Looker-on, on 02 March 2017 - 08:19 PM, said:
Has the idea that the club paid rent on the village ever been refuted by a club official at an AGM?
Services rendered to CFC? Wages of the lad from Gateshead?
#4576
Posted 28 July 2017 - 02:05 PM
The Black Triangle, on 28 July 2017 - 07:25 AM, said:
It's long been claimed by Carson and Co that any money owed by CFCFDS to CFC for subsidies, both direct and indirect, has been balanced out by use of CFCFDS facilities by CFC.
Town players supposedly staying at the 'Village', supposed coaching done by CFCFDS staff, and supposed use of the Gosforth Field training pitches for example.
However we're told there was very little accounting involved in these supposed 'quid pro quo' arrangements so we only have the word of Sutcliffe, Turner and Carson to reassure us.
It's also worth bearing in mind that Chris Turner submitted invoices as a Director of CFCFDS, only for the same Chris Turner to presumably approve payment as CEO of CFC...
This post has been edited by MDCCCLXVI: 28 July 2017 - 02:06 PM
#4577
Posted 28 July 2017 - 02:22 PM
MDCCCLXVI, on 28 July 2017 - 02:05 PM, said:
Town players supposedly staying at the 'Village', supposed coaching done by CFCFDS staff, and supposed use of the Gosforth Field training pitches for example.
However we're told there was very little accounting involved in these supposed 'quid pro quo' arrangements so we only have the word of Sutcliffe, Turner and Carson to reassure us.
It's also worth bearing in mind that Chris Turner submitted invoices as a Director of CFCFDS, only for the same Chris Turner to presumably approve payment as CEO of CFC...
Is that legal? A director of one company invoicing another company where he is the CEO?
#4578
Posted 28 July 2017 - 06:17 PM
MDCCCLXVI, on 28 July 2017 - 02:05 PM, said:
Town players supposedly staying at the 'Village', supposed coaching done by CFCFDS staff, and supposed use of the Gosforth Field training pitches for example.
However we're told there was very little accounting involved in these supposed 'quid pro quo' arrangements so we only have the word of Sutcliffe, Turner and Carson to reassure us.
It's also worth bearing in mind that Chris Turner submitted invoices as a Director of CFCFDS, only for the same Chris Turner to presumably approve payment as CEO of CFC...
By Ashley's admission, CFC definitely owe the DS the wages of 2 young pro footballers for a year. The DS paid those wages in preference to paying parents back, so who CFC owe is debatable. Rumour has it that the DS also paid for other CFC employees as well. I wonder who authorised these arrangements?
The bill could run into millions.
#4579
Posted 28 July 2017 - 06:45 PM
dim view, on 28 July 2017 - 06:17 PM, said:
The bill could run into millions.
And all the time a certain owner sits away from the "mess" seemingly unaware, or not interested, into how his football club was being "run"!
What a load of ollucks it all is, isn't it?
#4580
Posted 28 July 2017 - 07:41 PM
dim view, on 28 July 2017 - 06:17 PM, said:
The bill could run into millions.
Have all parents been reimbursed yet?