moondog, on 18 October 2016 - 07:52 AM, said:
Can you or somebody post up a translation (I can't do it on my phone)
After a plea bargain Cristiano Perrotti and Carlo Maurizio Prada came the sports sentence for the failure of Football Monza Brianza 1912 for Domingo Jon Anthony Armstrong-Emery, Patrick Dennis Bingham, Peter Montaquila and Paolo Di Stanislao.
So in the end all real and alleged successive administrators at the bedside of white and clubs in the 24 months preceding the bankruptcy order were inhibited and fined by the Football Association. For cases discussed today by the disciplinary section of the National Federal Court is ridiculous judgments, which relatively to the British and Irish Bingham Armstrong-Emery will not be applied even for the inaction of the two subjects from Italy. In both (the first president from 20 May 2012 to 11 December 2014, the second managing director from 11 December 2014 to 20 January 2015) it has been inflicted three years of inhibition by a fine of 10 thousand euro. Milder sanctions for "the cat and the fox", aka Montaquila and Di Stanislao. sole administrator of the period 20 January 2015 to 27 May 2015 (date of the bankruptcy order) were inflicted two years of inhibition by a fine of 5 thousand euro, while administrator did in the same period one year of inhibition with the 'fine of EUR 3 thousand.
Then let us remember that Perrotti and Prada, directors of the company in the period of presidency Armstrong-Emery, had bargained last August 1, respectively, the 16-month sanction of inhibition and 3,500 euro fine and 12 months of inhibition and 2 thousand euro fine, " for helping with their management to economic disruption asset of the club and for failing to control the activities put in place by then President Anthony Armstrong-Emery, in addition to not having formally expressed its disagreement with the poor management of the company " .
Here instead the motivations related to today's convictions: Armstrong-Emery "for having caused the mismanagement of the company, in a state of severe financial crisis at the time of his dismissal, which caused the collapse and subsequent bankruptcy; for failing to adequately write off the huge losses accumulated by the company "; Bingham "for having worsened, with its own management, economic and financial collapse of the company and, in particular, for failing to fulfill the commitment to perform shareholder loans for amounts necessary to ensure business continuity and in any case for an amount not less to 200 thousand euro by 31 December 2014 "; Montaquila "for having contributed, with its management of the company, the economic and financial collapse of the company; by not carrying out any intervention on the share capital or any operation to rehabilitate the business; for having allowed Paolo Di Stanislao, subject inhibited, to operate in society with the role of de facto administrator "; Stanislaus "for having played the role of 'director of fact' AC Monza Brianza 1912, assisting the sole shareholder and director Peter Montaquila, having carried out the administrative functions of the company on an ongoing basis, taking decisions and carrying out acts of management, on behalf and on behalf of itself, even without being formally invested in this role by a legally valid decision without ever having been added to any sheet filed registration with the competent League; for contributing to aggravate the state of the company decoction; for acting as administrator of that company being inhibited even for events dating back to the failure of Lanciano society; for having worked as a manager of the company Casale Calcio Srl, still being inhibited for events dating back to the failure of.
If Armstrong-Emery and Bingham, fled Italy, not filed written exculpatory, the Caserta Montaquila and Teramo Di Stanislao have tried, of course, trying to shift the blame to another former friend. The FIGC has announced that the two "deposited distinct memories in order to highlight the non-existent or minimal activity management performed by both in partnership, which also was already in an advanced state of decoction, since it refers to a short period of actual membership between late January 2015 and until the date of bankruptcy, that would allow them substantial explanation of the administrative role. In particular Mr. Montaquila challenged the position of partner and sole administrator attributed to him by the Federal Prosecutor; while Mr. Di Stanislao declared mere 'consultant' company for the same time period very limited. Both recalled however the existence of abundant case law exonerating favorable assumption, that all violations ascribed referral profiles assume responsibility in specific head each subject agent, not the attribution of responsibility improvata merely because of role . Assimilating the species to the case of 'failure Parma Fc Spa' (previously judged by responsible bodies of Justice Federal) and pointing the validity of some similarities with the case, concluded for the request to prosecute or to impose the minimum penalty prescribed ex art.
The judges, however, have accepted the requests of the Federal Prosecutor thus illustrating the decision to sentence: "It is well established that in the period preceding the date of bankruptcy, it has put in conduct that, regardless of their survey on the ordinary judicial level, are in stark contrast to the regulatory requirements challenged by federal prosecutors because in close causal relationship with the failure that led to the next failure. In this sense the acts consist of peaceful proof which demonstrates that the company Monza Brianza has been managed according to criteria unsuitable and uneconomical, in constant financial stress and the inevitable accumulation of losses never healed from extraordinary or corrective operations of any kind. It is sufficient to recall the principal corporate balance sheets, reports of Covisoc and many of those responsible for statements, which rank as unexceptionable evidence instruments in a coherent line in the manner alleged in referral management, to feel so fully proven and definitely absorbent relation to proceedings. Follows that the findings of the proceedings, however, converging on a handheld been brewing converged towards the bankruptcy of the company, can not be countered by impeding conditions, or in doubt, as to the actual cognizance of the violations attributed to the detriment of all parties prevented . In summary, and as responsible to this Court, applies the general term, federally protected, that in the period prior to the bankruptcy of the association, the management company of Monza Brianza was performed by implementing criteria and behavior that is not inspired by the principles of fairness, loyalty and probity, relevant sports law for the purposes and effects of articles 1a Cgs
The judges have focused in particular on Montaquila and Di Stanislao positions. Regarding the first they wrote: "The time consecutio is peaceful for tabulas, moreover is not countered by the person who pleads the only non-existence of the managerial function carried out within the partnership, since no administrative value being now at an advanced stage decoction already at the time of his inauguration. The exemption from liability reasons explained by the defense and concerning the actual substantial role played by remitted, defined as having no managerial authority, do not converge with the examination of the results of the proceedings, as the Court has come to the conclusion that the function performed by the biased converge towards involvement. Indeed, not only the documents filed by federal prosecutors, but also their testimony of the texts, design the referred as aware of his managerial role and protagonist of corporate transactions with players and others during the four-month settlement. Accordingly, the implication is clear and as such deserving of sanction that is tempered, however, precisely because of the reduced period of effective management of the association, precisely equal to about four months. " About Di Stanislao they have highlighted the fact that operated in Monza, and previously worked in Casale Monferrato (by removing the historical local club), despite the receipt inhibition for the failure of Lanciano: for athletes would be one to radiate short, but the ineffable FIGC believes however, considering the "soft" sanctions, which is a subject useful to the world of football ... "the time is consecutio evincibile by documentary - said" clearly "the Tfn - resulting marginally countered with regard to the effective management function carried out by the biased within the partnership, since no administrative value and held as a mere 'consultant' of the association and its director Mr. Peter Montaquila. The exemption from liability reasons explained by the defense and concerning the actual substantial role played by remitted, defined as having no managerial authority as mere 'corporate adviser', converge in part with the findings of the proceedings, as the Court has come to the conclusion that the function performed prevented from exposing his involvement albeit marginally. Indeed the documents lodged by federal prosecutors show management implications related to Mr. Di Stanislao, despite the defense tries to minimize the figure by making statements that would draw the referred as the central figure of Mr. Montaquila, this truly unique of the four-time author ante -fallimento AC Monza Brianza. But this is not the place that the careful preliminary examination certifies that Mr. Di Stanislao dealing directly with suppliers and third parties, albeit marginally and not continuously aware of its managerial role shared together with the administrator Mr. Montaquila of corporate transactions . Accordingly, the predicted involvement appears deserving of sanction, which however is further tempered precisely because of the reasons above in chronological order and role ".
sports justice is done? We believe that all white fans at this time are smiling bitter chewing. Of English Armstrong-Emery have gone missing in the UAE, the Irish Bingham became a consultant for the International Recruitment of Chesterfield through the infamous Royal Pearl International, releasing among other outlandish statements to the Derbyshire Times, like that of he "worked with in the past Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi," and had "detected the Monza with the intent to do so by his friends to sponsor Ferrari and Formula One." With regard to the other two, they will already be sniffing in which insolvent company to squeeze brigare (unverified rumors claimed that Di Stanislao was interested in Lecco owned by his friend Daniel Bizzozero, currently under house arrest). We are also puzzled for another reason: it does not have Armstrong-Emery "proceeded to compensate adequately the huge losses accumulated by the company" is not that the responsibility for the failure should be sought even before the 24 months prior to bankruptcy? The financial statements are public: the Monza Brianza 1912 failed with 4.6 million euro in debt, of which almost half in existence at the time of purchase of the club by "AAE" ...
dim view, on 18 October 2016 - 08:19 AM, said:
The important thing is whether the articles imply that Bingham might still be associated with CFC.
My understanding is that the poor thing severed his connection when we hurt his feelings, but that his advertising boards are still up because he paid in advance for them to be displayed. Is that right?
pretty much, although "paid" seems a vague word, depending who you talk to!
This post has been edited by Sammy Spireite: 18 October 2016 - 08:26 AM
Guest_freelander2_* 
D1 sports management D1sportsmanage1 Twitter.jpg (29.47K)
The Earl of Chesterfield 
Help
