John Duncan Interview - Fa Cup Semi Final Memories
#2
Posted 26 October 2017 - 04:49 PM
moondog, on 26 October 2017 - 04:20 PM, said:
Fabulous
It's scandalous that JD is not involved at CFC at a very senior level. I'd make him President.
#4
Posted 26 October 2017 - 05:50 PM
#5
Posted 26 October 2017 - 06:04 PM
hardgums, on 26 October 2017 - 05:50 PM, said:
He never got the recognition he deserved to be fair, and I say that in hindsight has one of those who at times did voice my disapproval of his management. JD was a master at using what he'd got to the best of its ability. And when he was allowed to bring in good players he returned with good football, it only went sour when, similar to now, quality players were sold and replaced with poorer players, the results were inevitable. Oh and then we had a crook in charge who fleeced whatever he could from the club and ended up doing jail time.
#6
Posted 26 October 2017 - 06:46 PM
#7
Posted 26 October 2017 - 07:05 PM
hardgums, on 26 October 2017 - 05:50 PM, said:
I used to do a paper round as a teenager for a bloke who refused to go while Duncan was manager and was true to his word, even missing the Old Trafford semi-final. Whether he ever went back I've no idea.
#8
Posted 26 October 2017 - 07:07 PM
However, my overriding feeling towards JD is admiration for a decent man who chose not to screw over the club over monies owed, after Brown had brought it to the brink of oblivion.
#9
Posted 26 October 2017 - 07:09 PM
John Duncan - Full of integrity and brought us some of our best times as Town fans. Like or loathe his style of play he was and still is a class act who will go down in CFC folklore and legend for what he did for and achieved with CFC.
Thanks Scotch Johnny, from the very bottom of my heart.
#10
Posted 26 October 2017 - 07:20 PM
If Jack can tap in to John Duncans insight and knowledge of the game he and the club as a whole should be in safe hands
#11
Posted 26 October 2017 - 07:23 PM
#12
Posted 26 October 2017 - 07:24 PM
When it comes to Duncan's time (the second time for me) I have to admit, the obvious aside, I tend to think immediately to the more negative aspects.
That said he is a club legend for all the right reasons, far more important things than footballing formations and he should be respected accordingly.
This post has been edited by Westbars Spireite: 26 October 2017 - 07:24 PM
#13
Posted 26 October 2017 - 07:24 PM
Westbars Spireite, on 26 October 2017 - 07:05 PM, said:
I suppose some things never change only the people involved lol
My grandad used to say he would never set foot in Saltergate while Shentall was chairman and of course we have the not a penny more brigade today
#14
Posted 26 October 2017 - 07:24 PM
moondog, on 26 October 2017 - 04:20 PM, said:
Still can't imagine what was going on in Elleray's mind when he disallowed the goal, and was wrong on two counts as JD mentions, because Andy Morris was blatantly fouled and prevented from scoring the rebound even if the ball hadn't crossed the line.
Was it just blind panic at the thought he might get a Premiership team kicked out of the cup, or was he having doubts about our penalty and trying to even things up, or did he just lose concentration and wake up to find he didn't really know what had happened. All highly unlikely, but what on earth WAS he thinking of.
#16
Posted 26 October 2017 - 07:42 PM
h again, on 26 October 2017 - 07:24 PM, said:
Was it just blind panic at the thought he might get a Premiership team kicked out of the cup, or was he having doubts about our penalty and trying to even things up, or did he just lose concentration and wake up to find he didn't really know what had happened. All highly unlikely, but what on earth WAS he thinking of.
ha ha. Time for another good natured inquest.....
One indisputable fact is that Morris was in an offside position when Howard shot, so he went from inactive to active if the ball didn't cross the line. Result? Free kick to them - unless you want to argue that illegally stopping a player from attempting to become active is still a penalty?
Another incongruity is that Duncan insists that the lino gave the goal and yet has never spoken to Ellerey to confirm it. I've never seen any video proof that the lino gave the goal, only Gray's commentary.
#17
Posted 26 October 2017 - 07:55 PM
dim view, on 26 October 2017 - 07:42 PM, said:
One indisputable fact is that Morris was in an offside position when Howard shot, so he went from inactive to active if the ball didn't cross the line. Result? Free kick to them - unless you want to argue that illegally stopping a player from attempting to become active is still a penalty?
Another incongruity is that Duncan insists that the lino gave the goal and yet has never spoken to Ellerey to confirm it. I've never seen any video proof that the lino gave the goal, only Gray's commentary.
But was the active and inactive thoughts on the offside rule in operation in 1997?
#18
Posted 26 October 2017 - 08:03 PM
dim view, on 26 October 2017 - 07:42 PM, said:
One indisputable fact is that Morris was in an offside position when Howard shot, so he went from inactive to active if the ball didn't cross the line. Result? Free kick to them - unless you want to argue that illegally stopping a player from attempting to become active is still a penalty?
Another incongruity is that Duncan insists that the lino gave the goal and yet has never spoken to Ellerey to confirm it. I've never seen any video proof that the lino gave the goal, only Gray's commentary.
I was level with the penalty spot ,about 8 rows back . The Lino gave the goal and ran straight back to the halfway line only to sneak sheepishly back when he thought Elleray had seen it differently.
#19
Posted 26 October 2017 - 08:15 PM
dim view, on 26 October 2017 - 07:42 PM, said:
One indisputable fact is that Morris was in an offside position when Howard shot, so he went from inactive to active if the ball didn't cross the line. Result? Free kick to them - unless you want to argue that illegally stopping a player from attempting to become active is still a penalty?
Another incongruity is that Duncan insists that the lino gave the goal and yet has never spoken to Ellerey to confirm it. I've never seen any video proof that the lino gave the goal, only Gray's commentary.
Is it indisputable that Morris was in an offside position? I would think you can run an argument that he was level with the defender looking at the you tube highlights.
#20
Posted 26 October 2017 - 08:16 PM
smiffy, on 26 October 2017 - 08:03 PM, said:
That was my memory of it as well
If only the officials had been able to talk as they are today with the earpieces lol
But knowing how pompous Ellary seemed with his schoolmaster instincts he would have probably ignored the lino if he had told him it had crossed the line