Bob's Board: PontePete - Viewing Profile - Bob's Board

But there is an argument there that it could be a reason, he even said so. But because it doesnt suit your story, you ignore it. A bit like data on climate change, I dont like it so I wont believe it.

Anyway, we wont agree, so I'll try to do my bit because its no skin off my nose and I hope it helps my grandkids. As always we can all make our own choices using what info we want and our own attitude to the reliability of data.

A bit like Covid, no idea if your 99% survive figure is right - but of course if it is and you were infected and infected 10 people and they each infected 10 people, that is one dead. And that is only secondary transmission. By the time you look at 4 or 5 times the transfer, you have a fair few dead, and given it could have been my mum, relatives, friends or parents of friends, I'm happy to do the best to stop it. as seemingly was the rest of the world - who dont like each other so certainly wouldnt have agreed this stuff otherwise!

But each to their own.... you do you, I'll do me, Misnomer will do angry, cps will do fishing, blue roan will be shy watching...

Roll on the Euros we there is some meaning to life!

Or was it that he got political and stood against Major?

Attenborough is pretty well thought of and he is a big believer in climate change being a human thing...

Ok...for starters, why did the so-called experts change it from global warming to climate change; quite simple, they were unable to sustain the narrative and justify it.

The 'science' is ridiculously ambiguous. What's the methodology for the data extrapolations? What is the data? Where is the data taken? Is the methodology consistent with other methodologies previously utilised in EXACTLY the same way...if not, that gives us skewed data. What's the modelling?

There's just no transparency with the data.

Now, folks can believe what they want but, as with the COVID data, we've seen how government funded organisations (like the BBC, the Met Office is also one) can present data.

As with COVID; any professional who dares to offer an alternative view, is immediately shut down, their professionalism and intelligence insulted, and labelled a climate change denier. A predictable diatribe to discredit people with years of experience.

Personally, I see it as nothing but pure catastrophising, in order to drive a narrative and an agenda.

I live in the south east and watered my garden at around 19.00...i put my coat on, because it was f'in freezing!

Ftr we had our heating on several times in May.

You never know Pete
He might have the fire on