National League V L2
#1
Posted 28 March 2024 - 12:23 PM
Of the teams currently in League Two, only MK Dons, Crewe, Gillingham, Walsall, Bradford and Swindon haven't played in the Conference/National League yet. Only Port Vale among the current L1 bottom six haven't played there. Unless I've missed anyone. There are plenty of 'traditional' sides who have come back from stints in non-league but also plenty who have made their way up from spending many years in non-league.
My point is, though it seemed like we would never sink so low until it happened, when it did, it was far from unusual, just as coming back up from there usually happens sooner or later.
Originally one-up, one-down was introduced in the late 80s, eventually becoming two up two down. As more and more clubs find themselves on the wrong side of the trapdoor, they push for three up three down and so on. Personally, I think that churn is a good thing- more mobility between leagues means more excitement, and if four go up from L2, why should only two go down?
#2
Posted 28 March 2024 - 01:29 PM
#3
Posted 28 March 2024 - 01:52 PM
As for Bradford, they do what they want, or so their fans say in awful accents, so I suppose they can choose what division they want to play in.
This post has been edited by Siberian Spireite: 28 March 2024 - 01:52 PM
#4
Posted 28 March 2024 - 02:12 PM
#5
Posted 28 March 2024 - 02:12 PM
Siberian Spireite, on 28 March 2024 - 12:23 PM, said:
Of the teams currently in League Two, only MK Dons, Crewe, Gillingham, Walsall, Bradford and Swindon haven't played in the Conference/National League yet. Only Port Vale among the current L1 bottom six haven't played there. Unless I've missed anyone. There are plenty of 'traditional' sides who have come back from stints in non-league but also plenty who have made their way up from spending many years in non-league.
My point is, though it seemed like we would never sink so low until it happened, when it did, it was far from unusual, just as coming back up from there usually happens sooner or later.
Originally one-up, one-down was introduced in the late 80s, eventually becoming two up two down. As more and more clubs find themselves on the wrong side of the trapdoor, they push for three up three down and so on. Personally, I think that churn is a good thing- more mobility between leagues means more excitement, and if four go up from L2, why should only two go down?
I don't get why it's three up directly from L2 and only two in L1. Has this ever been explained?
#6
Posted 28 March 2024 - 03:28 PM
Westbars Spireite, on 28 March 2024 - 02:12 PM, said:
It’s a historical thing. When the third and fourth divisions were introduced in 1958, promotion and relegation between the two leagues was 4 up - 4 down. One imagines that was a sell by the Football League to encourage clubs to agree to scrapping the old Third Divisions North and South.
Further up the leagues it remained 2 up - 2 down until 1973, when it was increased to 3. Four was seen as a step too far.
#7
Posted 28 March 2024 - 04:35 PM
60s 70s Spireite, on 28 March 2024 - 03:28 PM, said:
Further up the leagues it remained 2 up - 2 down until 1973, when it was increased to 3. Four was seen as a step too far.
Anyone got any observations on why 4 up,4 down would be considered 'a step too far'?
#9
Posted 28 March 2024 - 06:34 PM