Chris Fagan We've had a bid rejected for him
#42
Posted 27 August 2014 - 12:50 PM
#43
Posted 27 August 2014 - 12:51 PM
#44
Posted 27 August 2014 - 01:16 PM
MDCCCLXVI, on 26 August 2014 - 05:19 PM, said:
Could turn out to be terrific business.
And by the way, how long before deals like this mean Cook should be tied down on a longer contract?
Will this mean Armand goes out on loan for a month or so?
#47
Posted 27 August 2014 - 01:49 PM
#48
Posted 27 August 2014 - 01:53 PM
starsky72, on 27 August 2014 - 01:49 PM, said:
Can't see us splashing anywhere near 80k on a player out of contract in October?
If the player says he wants to leave the only choice they have is if they want some money for him or not. They don't have the luxury of setting a figure.
#49
Posted 27 August 2014 - 01:55 PM
DMU Blue, on 27 August 2014 - 01:53 PM, said:
If the player says he wants to leave the only choice they have is if they want some money for him or not. They don't have the luxury of setting a figure.
But, if we sign him for a free in October, we won't be able to play him till January, due to FIFA's stupid ruling about transfer windows.
#50
Posted 27 August 2014 - 02:05 PM
starsky72, on 27 August 2014 - 01:49 PM, said:
oh yeah!!!!!
#51
Posted 27 August 2014 - 02:07 PM
Darcy Sarto, on 27 August 2014 - 01:55 PM, said:
Not much of a bargaining chip on their part though.
They still lose him in October either way.
It's enough for a buying club to want to pay a nominal fee but not enough to get anything substantial from anyone. Am I right in thinking he can sign a pre contract with anyone he likes right away? Which means that they don't have long to thrash out a suitable deal.
"We'll give you 25k?"
"No"
"Ok, we'll call the players representative and offer him terms as a free agent and save our 25k/increase the signing on fee."
This post has been edited by DMU Blue: 27 August 2014 - 02:07 PM
#52
Posted 27 August 2014 - 02:22 PM
DMU Blue, on 27 August 2014 - 02:07 PM, said:
They still lose him in October either way.
It's enough for a buying club to want to pay a nominal fee but not enough to get anything substantial from anyone. Am I right in thinking he can sign a pre contract with anyone he likes right away? Which means that they don't have long to thrash out a suitable deal.
"We'll give you 25k?"
"No"
"Ok, we'll call the players representative and offer him terms as a free agent and save our 25k/increase the signing on fee."
I think they are struggling to keep hold of him, hence the interest here is Chesterfield FC's part, offer them a deal now, otherwise he will go elsewhere in January.
Accept whatever club offers them now, or risk losing him for nowt in Jan.
He could of course sign for Chesterfield now, and we loan him back to St Patricks till the end of their season (October) although what benefit this has to CFC I wouldn't know.
#53
Posted 27 August 2014 - 03:00 PM
Darcy Sarto, on 27 August 2014 - 02:22 PM, said:
Accept whatever club offers them now, or risk losing him for nowt in Jan.
He could of course sign for Chesterfield now, and we loan him back to St Patricks till the end of their season (October) although what benefit this has to CFC I wouldn't know.
Loan him back and lose him until January...
#55
Posted 27 August 2014 - 03:36 PM
MDCCCLXVI, on 26 August 2014 - 05:19 PM, said:
Could turn out to be terrific business.
And by the way, how long before deals like this mean Cook should be tied down on a longer contract?
Last time we did that we ended up going on a terrible run - I'm happy with his current contract
#56
Posted 19 November 2014 - 12:59 PM
#57
Posted 19 November 2014 - 04:39 PM
#59
Posted 19 November 2014 - 11:39 PM
Radders, on 19 November 2014 - 10:16 PM, said:
Given the reports of PCs reported interest I'm not surprised he attracted the "in the know brigade"
Disappointed nothing happened, but as he chose to stay in his domestic league he must be well and truly over hyped