[Search & Destroy]

Holmesc1, on 29 September 2023 - 08:58 AM, said:

So what do you do for a living then?

Personal trainer isn’t he?

Boot camps that sort of stuff

[Valley Blues]

Search & Destroy, on 29 September 2023 - 10:01 AM, said:

Personal trainer isn’t he?

Boot camps that sort of stuff

Depends what day it is and what the current topic of debate centres around.

[calvin plummers socks]

Valley Blues, on 29 September 2023 - 10:17 AM, said:

Depends what day it is and what the current topic of debate centres around.

Always a fan - cheers for the follow

[Valley Blues]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 September 2023 - 05:50 AM, said:

So Fox is given airtime to peddle an apology.

Well, of sorts.

In fact he's only a nod and a wink from portraying himself as the victim.

'It wasn't who I am', he simperingly declares.

But any time spent viewing his previous tells us it's exactly who he is. It's exactly what so many on GeeBeebies are.

To the point we now have tory MP's - tory MP's! - calling for the entire outlet to be closed.

Or as the usual suspects will no doubt insist, 'cancelled'.

Ah well, at least they're not blaming migrants for a change...are they?

So many on GB News and so many, according to their own MP’s, in your Labour Party.

And the Party leader, with designs on running our country, failed to take any action, according to your own MP.

Not sure if you accidentally missed that one?

This post has been edited by Valley Blues: 29 September 2023 - 11:20 AM

[Mr Mercury]

Valley Blues, on 29 September 2023 - 11:20 AM, said:

So many on GB News and so many, according to their own MP’s, in your Labour Party.

And the Party leader, with designs on running our country, failed to take any action, according to your own MP.

Not sure if you accidentally missed that one?

From people in her iwn party and KS closed his door hoping it would go away? Wet lettuce “leader”

[Valley Blues]

Mr Mercury, on 29 September 2023 - 12:02 PM, said:

From people in her iwn party and KS closed his door hoping it would go away? Wet lettuce “leader”

I know. Folks in glass houses and all that.

However, let’s not get away from the fact that Lawrence Fox is a complete tool.

It just appears that he’s not on his own, political wings having nothing to do with it but the usual suspects are incapable of acknowledging it.

Maybe by not picking and choosing links that fit one’s own agenda and ignoring everything else might start to offer a modicum of credibility to the usual suspect?

[dart in the crossbar]

clarevoyant., on 28 September 2023 - 05:59 PM, said:

I can't see him collecting stamps

deserved better. quality.

[Manfred Archie Mac Gerbil]

GBN have suspended the Rev for defending Wootton, they’ll only have Farage and Mogg left at this rate.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Valley Blues, on 29 September 2023 - 11:20 AM, said:

So many on GB News and so many, according to their own MP’s, in your Labour Party.

And the Party leader, with designs on running our country, failed to take any action, according to your own MP.

Not sure if you accidentally missed that one?

Ah, more whataboutery.

But as you're so desperate for a response I'll save readers any more of your snidey sideways snipes by posting one.

You're regurgitating a piece several months old, relating to an entirely different issue, which was extensively discussed on here at the time. Please, be my guest, go back and re-visit it.

So back on topic, has any Labour person - let alone "many" - made comments matching Fox's? On a public platform like GeeBeebies? I suggest you show us where and when if you're gonna try to chuck muck like this.

Then as you're so intent on getting personal, shall we widen the exchange into one about who's posted misogyny or similarly bigoted stuff and whether or not you've called them out? Yeah? Okay?

Or might that glass house you mention prove a little closer to home.

Mate, if I were you I'd leave it at "Fox is a tool'...

[dim view]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 September 2023 - 04:38 PM, said:

Ah, more whataboutery.

But as you're so desperate for a response I'll save readers any more of your snidey sideways snipes by posting one.

You're regurgitating a piece several months old, relating to an entirely different issue, which was extensively discussed on here at the time. Please, be my guest, go back and re-visit it.

So back on topic, has any Labour person - let alone "many" - made comments matching Fox's? On a public platform like GeeBeebies? I suggest you show us where and when if you're gonna try to chuck muck like this.

Then as you're so intent on getting personal, shall we widen the exchange into one about who's posted misogyny or similarly bigoted stuff and whether or not you've called them out? Yeah? Okay?

Or might that glass house you mention prove a little closer to home.

Mate, if I were you I'd leave it at "Fox is a tool'...

GB News CEO this morning..........
https://www.bbc.co.u.../av/uk-66959065

[Mr Mercury]

[quote name='The Earl of Chesterfield' timestamp='1696005510' post='1774686'


So back on topic, has any Labour person - let alone "many" - made comments matching Fox's? On a public platform like GeeBeebies? I suggest you show us where and when if you're gonna try to chuck muck like this.

[/quote]
Is this enough “muck”
https://www.dailymai...s-bad-else.html

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 29 September 2023 - 07:26 PM

[Valley Blues]

dim view, on 29 September 2023 - 04:49 PM, said:

GB News CEO this morning..........
https://www.bbc.co.u.../av/uk-66959065

I know.

It’s a pity Starmer and his party didn’t adopt the same attitude when it was going on within their own ranks.

[Valley Blues]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 September 2023 - 04:38 PM, said:

Ah, more whataboutery.

But as you're so desperate for a response I'll save readers any more of your snidey sideways snipes by posting one.

You're regurgitating a piece several months old, relating to an entirely different issue, which was extensively discussed on here at the time. Please, be my guest, go back and re-visit it.

So back on topic, has any Labour person - let alone "many" - made comments matching Fox's? On a public platform like GeeBeebies? I suggest you show us where and when if you're gonna try to chuck muck like this.

Then as you're so intent on getting personal, shall we widen the exchange into one about who's posted misogyny or similarly bigoted stuff and whether or not you've called them out? Yeah? Okay?

Or might that glass house you mention prove a little closer to home.

Mate, if I were you I'd leave it at "Fox is a tool'...

An entirely different issue? What, a different type of misogyny? Or is it only misogyny when it’s a certain side of the fence?

And I wasn’t aware it had a sell-by date.

And I wasn’t aware that misogynist actions were less significant when conducted behind closed doors as opposed to in the public domain.

I assumed they were both unacceptable but it looks like it’s more to do with the rosette as opposed to the actions.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Valley Blues, on 29 September 2023 - 08:04 PM, said:

An entirely different issue? What, a different type of misogyny? Or is it only misogyny when it’s a certain side of the fence?

And I wasn’t aware it had a sell-by date.

And I wasn’t aware that misogynist actions were less significant when conducted behind closed doors as opposed to in the public domain.

I assumed they were both unacceptable but it looks like it’s more to do with the rosette as opposed to the actions.

So that's a 'No', then.

You can't supply evidence of any - let alone 'many' - Labour people replicating Fox's comments.

Just another attempt to make yourself feel somehow clever.

In fact do you ever offer anything else to these exchanges....?

[Misnomer]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 September 2023 - 08:16 PM, said:

So that's a 'No', then.

You can't supply evidence of any - let alone 'many' - Labour people replicating Fox's comments.

Just another attempt to make yourself feel somehow clever.

In fact do you ever offer anything else to these exchanges....?

Says the man, when asked,has never supplied any evidence whatsoever....

[Mr Mercury]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 September 2023 - 08:16 PM, said:

So that's a 'No', then.

You can't supply evidence of any - let alone 'many' - Labour people replicating Fox's comments.

Just another attempt to make yourself feel somehow clever.

In fact do you ever offer anything else to these exchanges....?

See post #91

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Mr Mercury, on 29 September 2023 - 07:22 PM, said:

Is this enough “muck”
https://www.dailymai...s-bad-else.html

Really?

Dug up from 2019?

Desperate, truly desperate.

Especially after all your excusing and defending and even applauding Trump and Farage and Boris the Liar and Reece-Mogg and all the rest on the 'Tory Scum' topic.

A long running and evidence based narrative of callous, cruel, cronyistic incompetence and corruption.

Mate - presenters on the very propaganda platform you recently deemed mainstream are being fired. For utterly disgusting behaviour. Not Labour, not the Beeb, not anyone else.

Gee-Bee-bies.

And worst of all?

No one in the real mainstream media is the least bit surprised.

Once again I'd urge you to look around at who's on your side of the argument...

[Mr Mercury]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 29 September 2023 - 08:31 PM, said:

Really?

Dug up from 2019?

Desperate, truly desperate.

Especially after all your excusing and defending and even applauding Trump and Farage and Boris the Liar and Reece-Mogg and all the rest on the 'Tory Scum' topic.

A long running and evidence based narrative of callous, cruel, cronyistic incompetence and corruption.

Mate - presenters on the very propaganda platform you recently deemed mainstream are being fired. For utterly disgusting behaviour. Not Labour, not the Beeb, not anyone else.

Gee-Bee-bies.

And worst of all?

No one in the real mainstream media is the least bit surprised.

Once again I'd urge you to look around at who's on your side of the argument...

What difference does the date make? I’d hazard a guess you’ve not even read it!
And all “my excusing”..whataboutery at its finest, the expert at it.
The evidence has been provided that you requested and you simply won’t accept it because it flies in the face of your political views.
More blinkered than Red Rum.

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 29 September 2023 - 08:37 PM

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Mr Mercury, on 29 September 2023 - 08:29 PM, said:

See post #91

Faux outrage.

He's overseen a culture where it's okay to sneer and jeer and smear. Where individuals and groups are repeatedly insulted. Where characters deemed unwelcome on mainstream media are given unfettered airtime.

And now he's doing what most on his propaganda platform would dub 'virtue signalling' 'cos he'd afraid of sanctions of some sort.

Reminds me of Carson thanking fans for exposing sleaze on Sheff Road...

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Mr Mercury, on 29 September 2023 - 08:35 PM, said:

What difference does the date make? I’d hazard a guess you’ve not even read it!
And all “my excusing”..whataboutery at its finest, the expert at it.
The evidence has been provided that you requested and you simply won’t accept it because it flies in the face of your political views.
More blinkered than Red Rum.

Again, the 'Tory Scum' thread.

Yet you still insist Boris the Liar was subject to a witch hunt.

And again, presenters on your favourite channel being exposed.

Sorry pal, but all the whataboutery in the world can't erase these simple facts...

This post has been edited by The Earl of Chesterfield: 29 September 2023 - 08:51 PM