Bob's Board: Bobby Darling - Viewing Profile - Bob's Board

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 23 May 2024 - 12:36 PM, said:

Sunak is a rich entitled person who has become more rich and entitled. His lack of political nous is legendary. He didn’t beat Truss. He doesn’t listen to his advisors. He discounted advice to go out in the rain and inform the electorate that he was a capable leader. That caused so much disbelief amongst Tories. Nearly as much as him rejecting his election strategy consultant’s advice as to the timing of the election. He is so bad that some serious people who are close to him believe he wants out now and is under pressure from his wife to quit. Sunak? Starmer? Give over.

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 04 May 2024 - 07:05 PM, said:

Starmer’s speech in the West Midlands very impressive. Clear, good content and powerful. No hubris and reaching out to non Labour voters. He is an excellent politician, able to deliver his message without oral pomposity. Labour HQ’s take on these elections apparently 370 - 400 seats if GE held now. That of course can change over the next 6 months. Street being soft soaped. The right wing Fabricant is his partner and he voted for Truss in the leadership election. Didn’t resign over HS2. Good riddance.

isleaiw1, on 27 April 2024 - 09:06 AM, said:

It is time barred so the police are not investigating it. That is obvious to anyone to be frank as there have been several publicised Tory newspaper accusations in the last year about Labour MPs. You think she is guilty cos you are anti Labour and suck up “She said to a neighbour I’m the Landlord”. Why you fear Reds under the Beds who tip up to a property that they are fiddling tax on and openly admit to someone who they have lived next to, that they are the “landlord” ,makes me smile. They are all thick surely. Except she didn’t, did she? CGT? Read your post that I responded to.
I couldn’t care about your political views, cos as you know I consider you to know little about politics, but I do get miffed about your claims to be objective. You’re not. I think you were probably bullied by a Skinner or your dad was a Scab. In truth I don’t know but don’t play the uncommitted. And stop jumping when you’re found out. Who started this thread?

dim view, on 27 April 2024 - 08:15 AM, said:

Not my point. She cannot be prosecuted for the electoral register. No idea about tax.

isleaiw1, on 16 April 2024 - 07:57 PM, said:

No it’s not. The police aren’t investigating the electoral register. They understand the law on what constitutes a criminal offence in providing false information for the electoral register and the time in which any transgression can be a criminal offence. Raynor might be embarrassed but she cannot be prosecuted with regards to the electoral register. If you like to be considered objective, which on any issue pertaining to the Labour Party you aren’t, at least get your ducks in a row.