Bob's Board - Chesterfield FC: Higdon - Bob's Board - Chesterfield FC

Jump to content

  • (76 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Higdon

#61 User is offline   Wooden Spoon 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 42,656
  • Joined: 07-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 July 2014 - 06:31 PM

View PostBenno Spire, on 05 July 2014 - 05:20 PM, said:

Higdon wanted 7k per week to sign for CFC. I am sure a club out there will offer want he wants.



How long was this for?

Could we offer a longer deal but lower wage?
A new hope.
0

#62 User is offline   martatcross 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11,105
  • Joined: 08-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:clay cross

Posted 05 July 2014 - 06:53 PM

Think the deal is dead now no doubt higdon will get what he wants elsewhere soon
Can't salute yer can't find a flag if that don't suit yer that's a drag
0

#63 User is offline   Ernie Ernie Ernie 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30,445
  • Joined: 06-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 July 2014 - 07:34 PM

View Postmartatcross, on 05 July 2014 - 06:53 PM, said:

Think the deal is dead now no doubt higdon will get what he wants elsewhere soon


According to some on here everyone else has finalised their squads. How can this be with this competition for higdon? Time to move on 6/7k is beyond us
0

#64 User is offline   Westbars Spireite 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 63,410
  • Joined: 18-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield, Derbyshire
  • Interests:Chesterfield FC, cricket, beer

Posted 05 July 2014 - 07:39 PM

View Postmartatcross, on 05 July 2014 - 06:53 PM, said:

Think the deal is dead now no doubt higdon will get what he wants elsewhere soon


And if it's only about money for him then he'll be proved 'right'.
0

#65 User is offline   Hector 

  • Reserve Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 580
  • Joined: 02-May 12
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 July 2014 - 07:41 PM

£6k, £7k per week ? If this is true, then I'd be horrified if we had agreed to pay this. Relieved we have said no!
0

#66 User is offline   starsky72 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,241
  • Joined: 30-April 11

Posted 05 July 2014 - 07:50 PM

So if 6/7 is too much for a striker who will/should do a good job in L1 the how much should we be looking at paying??
0

#67 User is offline   Nitrous Oxide 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,897
  • Joined: 02-November 09

Posted 05 July 2014 - 08:30 PM

View PostHector, on 05 July 2014 - 07:41 PM, said:

£6k, £7k per week ? If this is true, then I'd be horrified if we had agreed to pay this. Relieved we have said no!

We might have said yes but not offered his club enough for him.
0

#68 User is offline   Westbars Spireite 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 63,410
  • Joined: 18-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield, Derbyshire
  • Interests:Chesterfield FC, cricket, beer

Posted 05 July 2014 - 08:32 PM

View PostNitrous Oxide, on 05 July 2014 - 08:30 PM, said:

We might have said yes but not offered his club enough for him.


It sounds like his exit from them had been negotiated.
0

#69 User is offline   Beelzebub 

  • Key Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,721
  • Joined: 15-January 07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 July 2014 - 08:50 PM

View PostWestbars Spireite, on 05 July 2014 - 08:32 PM, said:

It sounds like his exit from them had been negotiated.

A tweet from NEC said he'd be given a month's leave to look for another club not that he had been released. Sounds like they want him off the payroll but don't want to pay him up.
0

#70 User is offline   Westbars Spireite 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 63,410
  • Joined: 18-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield, Derbyshire
  • Interests:Chesterfield FC, cricket, beer

Posted 05 July 2014 - 08:52 PM

View PostBeelzebub, on 05 July 2014 - 08:50 PM, said:

A tweet from NEC said he'd be given a month's leave to look for another club not that he had been released. Sounds like they want him off the payroll but don't want to pay him up.


I doubt we'd be in the market for him if there'd been a transfer fee.
0

#71 User is offline   longeatonspireite 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,645
  • Joined: 22-March 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Long Eaton
  • Interests:Photography, cooking, holidays

Posted 05 July 2014 - 09:03 PM

Perhaps we have set our sights too high. Higdon has done well against sides like Ajax, Feyenoord, FC Twente,PSV, plus other quality less well known Dutch Eredivisie sides.
These are not Mansfields :rolleyes: and consequently he will be worth more than the run of the mill Div 1 striker, and to questions CFC's ambition is pure wind-up.
FASTER....FITTER....STRONGER
0

#72 User is offline   Beelzebub 

  • Key Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,721
  • Joined: 15-January 07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 July 2014 - 09:08 PM

View PostWestbars Spireite, on 05 July 2014 - 08:52 PM, said:

I doubt we'd be in the market for him if there'd been a transfer fee.

Agreed, but if they gave him a pay off it would make him more likely to accept a lower wage from his new club.

It is like playing poker, they have been relegated and can't afford him and hope he can get a move but other clubs aren't able to or aren't prepared to match his current wages so he either stays and takes the wages NEC can't afford or NEC pay him off so he doesn't lose out by taking a lower wage elsewhere.

NEC may have to pay up but would obviously prefer not to. We seem go have said his wage demands are too high and, as we seemed to be the highest bidders, there don't seem to be any other takers. NEC are in a difficult position, do they call our bluff or fold and offer him a settlement enabling us to sign him
2

#73 User is offline   Spireite-Karl 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 19,037
  • Joined: 05-January 06

Posted 05 July 2014 - 09:54 PM

View PostBeelzebub, on 05 July 2014 - 09:08 PM, said:

Agreed, but if they gave him a pay off it would make him more likely to accept a lower wage from his new club.

It is like playing poker, they have been relegated and can't afford him and hope he can get a move but other clubs aren't able to or aren't prepared to match his current wages so he either stays and takes the wages NEC can't afford or NEC pay him off so he doesn't lose out by taking a lower wage elsewhere.

NEC may have to pay up but would obviously prefer not to. We seem go have said his wage demands are too high and, as we seemed to be the highest bidders, there don't seem to be any other takers. NEC are in a difficult position, do they call our bluff or fold and offer him a settlement enabling us to sign him



You could be on to something there.
#notapennymore
0

#74 User is offline   Westbars Spireite 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 63,410
  • Joined: 18-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield, Derbyshire
  • Interests:Chesterfield FC, cricket, beer

Posted 05 July 2014 - 10:01 PM

View PostBeelzebub, on 05 July 2014 - 09:08 PM, said:

Agreed, but if they gave him a pay off it would make him more likely to accept a lower wage from his new club.

It is like playing poker, they have been relegated and can't afford him and hope he can get a move but other clubs aren't able to or aren't prepared to match his current wages so he either stays and takes the wages NEC can't afford or NEC pay him off so he doesn't lose out by taking a lower wage elsewhere.

NEC may have to pay up but would obviously prefer not to. We seem go have said his wage demands are too high and, as we seemed to be the highest bidders, there don't seem to be any other takers. NEC are in a difficult position, do they call our bluff or fold and offer him a settlement enabling us to sign him


You may not be a million miles away.
0

#75 User is offline   DMU Blue 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,135
  • Joined: 08-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 05 July 2014 - 11:14 PM

Can you imagine how our fans would react if we signed a player on 6k a week who didn't bag a goal in the first two games?
Up the Blues
0

#76 User is online   Goku 

  • Super Saiyan and saviour of the universe
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 34,914
  • Joined: 10-August 07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 July 2014 - 11:17 PM

View PostDMU Blue, on 05 July 2014 - 11:14 PM, said:

Can you imagine how our fans would react if we signed a player on 6k a week who didn't bag a goal in the first two games?


No. What would it be?
0

#77 User is online   azul 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 34,133
  • Joined: 15-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 July 2014 - 11:18 PM

View PostDMU Blue, on 05 July 2014 - 11:14 PM, said:

Can you imagine how our fans would react if we signed a player on 6k a week who didn't bag a goal in the first two games?


That one has been done to death by bellzybub, try a new angle for god sake
Accentuate th Positive, eliminate the negative
0

#78 User is offline   Westbars Spireite 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 63,410
  • Joined: 18-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield, Derbyshire
  • Interests:Chesterfield FC, cricket, beer

Posted 05 July 2014 - 11:25 PM

View PostDMU Blue, on 05 July 2014 - 11:14 PM, said:

Can you imagine how our fans would react if we signed a player on 6k a week who didn't bag a goal in the first two games?


I think you overestimate the stupidity of the fanbase.
0

#79 User is offline   Rodney's Moustache 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,806
  • Joined: 22-November 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:brimington

Posted 05 July 2014 - 11:42 PM

So lets say the scenario is that Higdon signed for 7k and his goals fired us to promotion would people then say it was too much given Rotherham's estimate of 4 million for getting into the championship.There in lies the difference between a team that has genuine ambitions and one that only talks the talk.Two things in football are certs England will never win a major tournament and CFCwill never play in the Championship.Personally I don't care about England and will settle for CFC being competitive in league one but even that is starting to look like it's beyond our ambitions.

This post has been edited by Rodney's Moustache: 05 July 2014 - 11:45 PM

1

#80 User is offline   Ernie Ernie Ernie 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30,445
  • Joined: 06-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 July 2014 - 12:34 AM

View Poststarsky72, on 05 July 2014 - 07:50 PM, said:

So if 6/7 is too much for a striker who will/should do a good job in L1 the how much should we be looking at paying??


What we can afford
0

Share this topic:


  • (76 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users