Adam Johnson
#41
Posted 12 February 2016 - 07:57 AM
(I get the point you're making & he's clearly not a 'paedo' but what he did was wrong)
#42
Posted 12 February 2016 - 08:29 AM
Anyway, after said introduction we were having a chat and it turned out she was 15. I made my excuses and left her to her night.
The point I'm making is sometimes it is difficult to tell how old girls are but when you do know they are underage you should walk away and not "groom" them as Johnson has admitted to doing. He's probably not a paedo but he's a very silly boy.
#43
Posted 12 February 2016 - 08:29 AM
And morally-his missus was about to have their first baby!
5 years inside will probably make him think about where he waggles it about in future.
Has any man thrown away a life/career as stupidly as him?
#44
Posted 12 February 2016 - 08:31 AM
calvin plummers socks, on 12 February 2016 - 08:29 AM, said:
And morally-his missus was about to have their first baby!
5 years inside will probably make him think about where he waggles it about in future.
Has any man thrown away a life/career as stupidly as him?
No way will he get 5 years inside, never in a million years
#45
Posted 12 February 2016 - 08:36 AM
Search and Destroy, on 12 February 2016 - 08:31 AM, said:
If he's found guilty of the two charges of further sexual activity with a 15 yr old, the ones he's pleaded not guilty to, which apparently involves actual sexual intercourse, then I think he'll get at least 5 years, maybe more. If it's the just the two counts of grooming and touching a 15 year old he might get 18 months. I think the grooming and the fact he was fully aware she was under 16 is a very serious admission by him. Either way I think he'll be doing a stretch inside of some sorts.
#46
Posted 12 February 2016 - 08:49 AM
Mr Mercury, on 12 February 2016 - 08:36 AM, said:
There was a lad from Chesterfield who did much worse than AJ, yet walked away in January with a 3 year community order & 5 years on the sex offenders register! Nonces and peados get very little punishment these days!
#47
Posted 12 February 2016 - 09:13 AM
Andy Spireite, on 12 February 2016 - 08:29 AM, said:
Anyway, after said introduction we were having a chat and it turned out she was 15. I made my excuses and left her to her night.
The point I'm making is sometimes it is difficult to tell how old girls are but when you do know they are underage you should walk away and not "groom" them as Johnson has admitted to doing. He's probably not a paedo but he's a very silly boy.
The difference being you walked away. He hopped on.
#48
Posted 12 February 2016 - 09:14 AM
ash_cfc, on 12 February 2016 - 08:49 AM, said:
He may get more because he's a footballer on £60k a week because there will be a Facebook campaign if he isn't hung.
Yesterday's news was that about the crazy driver who overtook a bus on a blind bend and killed two very young children, got 4 years, 4 years and out in 2 for killing to kids.
#49
Posted 12 February 2016 - 09:28 AM
Andy Spireite, on 12 February 2016 - 08:29 AM, said:
Anyway, after said introduction we were having a chat and it turned out she was 15. I made my excuses and left her to her night.
The point I'm making is sometimes it is difficult to tell how old girls are but when you do know they are underage you should walk away and not "groom" them as Johnson has admitted to doing. He's probably not a paedo but he's a very silly boy.
Exactly the same thing happened to me in Genesis when I was 18 and it turned out said girl was also 15. I found out later on in the weekend when seeing if she wanted to meet up. Goodbye!
Even now (I'm 34) I think back and she easily looked the same age as me. You automatically think as they are in a nightclub they will be absolute minimum 16. It's a minefield and I can see how some fellas come a cropper especially high profile people as a lot of girls (and men) whatever age are desperate to snare someone rich. Not walking away when he found out, AJ deserves all he will get.
#50
Posted 12 February 2016 - 10:58 AM
Goku, on 12 February 2016 - 07:52 AM, said:
In which case I'm glad the legal age is what it is in this country. As a father of 12 and 14 year old girls I can quite categorically state 14 year olds are children and not ready for sexual encounters
#51
Posted 12 February 2016 - 01:00 PM
firedodger, on 12 February 2016 - 10:58 AM, said:
I agree, I wouldn't be comfortable with that either. Just being an annoyance and pointing stuff out.
#52
Posted 12 February 2016 - 01:08 PM
Goku, on 12 February 2016 - 01:00 PM, said:
Reading stuff from the court case today doesn't exactly paint him any favourable light (not that you'd expect it to when he's a self-admitted noncing footballer admittedly).
I'm still flabbergasted that his Missus is there supporting him. Bet she's delighted to hear his text messages read out.
This post has been edited by Westbars Spireite: 12 February 2016 - 01:08 PM
#53
Posted 12 February 2016 - 01:18 PM
Westbars Spireite, on 12 February 2016 - 01:08 PM, said:
I'm still flabbergasted that his Missus is there supporting him. Bet she's delighted to hear his text messages read out.
The stuff from Josh Halliday on Twitter? Makes for very creepy reading.
#54
Posted 12 February 2016 - 01:21 PM
hilly81, on 12 February 2016 - 01:18 PM, said:
I saw it on the Daily Mirror website. He's a very naughty man indeed and thick as pig s5it too.
Josh Halliday @JoshHalliday 21m21 minutes ago Bradford, England
Johnson searched internet for "legal age of consent" on 3 Feb, days after alleged sexual activity with 15 year old girl, court told
This post has been edited by Westbars Spireite: 12 February 2016 - 01:22 PM
#55
Posted 12 February 2016 - 01:35 PM
firedodger, on 12 February 2016 - 10:58 AM, said:
Maybe so, but many young girls actually are (as in, already sexually active). Do you really think they wait until 16+ to lose their virginity? When I was a teenager in the 80s it was commonplace to have sexual relationships before 16; underage sexual intercourse (before 16) was almost a right of passage/quest.....
#56
Posted 12 February 2016 - 01:49 PM
Misnomer, on 10 February 2016 - 09:50 PM, said:
Hi M, how's you?
I think both of your statements lend themselves to what I would term 'sweeping generalisations'.
C
Misnomer, on 10 February 2016 - 09:50 PM, said:
Hi M, how's you?
I think both of your statements lend themselves to what I would term 'sweeping generalisations'.
C
#57
Posted 12 February 2016 - 01:49 PM
Misnomer, on 12 February 2016 - 01:35 PM, said:
True. But most commonly with someone of your own age.
#59
Posted 12 February 2016 - 01:52 PM
Misnomer, on 12 February 2016 - 01:35 PM, said:
Not for me, it wasn't ..........