[carlT]

Hi Pete,
regarding the proposal of ownership, we will be getting this in mail form at some point. Will this be sooner rather than later, given the CFC AGM on the 18th of Jan. I would have thought these proposals will be aired at that meeting. can we not try to fit in the AGM before that date, ?

[fishini]

carlT, on Dec 11 2006, 09:22 AM, said:

Hi Pete,
regarding the proposal of ownership, we will be getting this in mail form at some point. Will this be sooner rather than later, given the CFC AGM on the 18th of Jan. I would have thought these proposals will be aired at that meeting. can we not try to fit in the AGM before that date, ?

You don't expect a straight answer do you? It is the CFSS you are talking about

[dalekpete]

carlT, on Dec 11 2006, 09:22 AM, said:

Hi Pete,
regarding the proposal of ownership, we will be getting this in mail form at some point. Will this be sooner rather than later, given the CFC AGM on the 18th of Jan. I would have thought these proposals will be aired at that meeting. can we not try to fit in the AGM before that date, ?

Sorry Carl- I sometimes miss posts. It was good of Les to bring it to my attention.

If there is a proposal that represents a significant change to the structure then it will mean a postal ballot rather than just the AGM. It is possible that the two would then be run side-by-side so that the AGM will answer any questions members have before the ballot closes.

It would be preferable if this was done before the 18th.

[h again]

fishini, on Dec 12 2006, 06:36 PM, said:

You don't expect a straight answer do you? It is the CFSS you are talking about

Hello - it's a couple of days since we won one so fishi's dared to stick his head out of the water again.

[carlT]

dalekpete, on Dec 12 2006, 11:07 PM, said:

Sorry Carl- I sometimes miss posts. It was good of Les to bring it to my attention.

If there is a proposal that represents a significant change to the structure then it will mean a postal ballot rather than just the AGM. It is possible that the two would then be run side-by-side so that the AGM will answer any questions members have before the ballot closes.

It would be preferable if this was done before the 18th.

Thanks Pete,
Didn't know whether to post it here or on the main debate site, interesting I would have thought that the ownership would repesent a significant change to the structure of CFSS, maybe I'm reading it wrong?
thanks anyway.

[Town_Fan]

h again, on Dec 12 2006, 11:14 PM, said:

Hello - it's a couple of days since we won one so fishi's dared to stick his head out of the water again.

I guess you only come out when we win, must be why we dont see that much of you.

[fishini]

dalekpete, on Dec 12 2006, 11:07 PM, said:

Sorry Carl- I sometimes miss posts. It was good of Les to bring it to my attention.

If there is a proposal that represents a significant change to the structure then it will mean a postal ballot rather than just the AGM. It is possible that the two would then be run side-by-side so that the AGM will answer any questions members have before the ballot closes.

It would be preferable if this was done before the 18th.

5 days and counting or will this be another date missed? Time will tell

[fishini]

h again, on Dec 12 2006, 11:14 PM, said:

Hello - it's a couple of days since we won one so fishi's dared to stick his head out of the water again.

Well here you are again talking out of your rectum, I would love to insult you but the moderators have warned me not to on the basis that you are not bright enough to notice, they pionted out it would be a waste of my time and space on the board, anyway I was brought up never to mock the afflicted so in your case I won't.

[Town_Fan]

fishini, on Dec 13 2006, 05:25 PM, said:

5 days and counting or will this be another date missed? Time will tell

I think Pete meant the 18th of Jan, the date of the AGM.

[fishini]

Town_Fan, on Dec 13 2006, 05:39 PM, said:

I think Pete meant the 18th of Jan, the date of the AGM.

OK the 18th of Jan it maybe but put it in perspective, the proposals where put to the CFSS on the 15th Oct 2006, 2 days later we were told that we may get to know them in a couple of days, now we are talking 3 months and it's only a hope at that, like lightening at the CFSS are they not? Whats the odd we hear nothing prior to the AGM and are we likely to get any minutes from previous meeting prior to the AGM?

[Town_Fan]

fishini, on Dec 13 2006, 06:19 PM, said:

OK the 18th of Jan it maybe but put it in perspective, the proposals where put to the CFSS on the 15th Oct 2006, 2 days later we were told that we may get to know them in a couple of days, now we are talking 3 months and it's only a hope at that, like lightening at the CFSS are they not? Whats the odd we hear nothing prior to the AGM and are we likely to get any minutes from previous meeting prior to the AGM?

No argument from me fish. Just clarifying what I thought Pete meant by saying the 18th.

There should be no excuses now with a date set.

[fishini]

Town_Fan, on Dec 13 2006, 06:27 PM, said:

No argument from me fish. Just clarifying what I thought Pete meant by saying the 18th.

There should be no excuses now with a date set.

Want to bet? The excuses dept will already be working to come up with a credible reason for missing this date, they will keep the soppy's and H's of this world happy. Mind you they might make this date, theres always a first for everything

[h again]

fishini, on Dec 13 2006, 06:34 PM, said:

Want to bet? The excuses dept will already be working to come up with a credible reason for missing this date, they will keep the soppy's and H's of this world happy. Mind you they might make this date, theres always a first for everything

What? You're thinkimg of posting something positive? Now that would be a first.
Don't worry about the new ground, by the way. They're well on with cleaning up the most polluted site in Europe out at Wingerworth. Ideal spot for a football ground, as I'm sure the council are now thinking.

[Spireite61]

h again, on Dec 14 2006, 12:47 AM, said:

What? You're thinkimg of posting something positive? Now that would be a first.
Don't worry about the new ground, by the way. They're well on with cleaning up the most polluted site in Europe out at Wingerworth. Ideal spot for a football ground, as I'm sure the council are now thinking.

Have thought all along that the site at Wingerworth would make a far better location for the new ground - plenty of land and Im sure the grants from Europe and English Partnerships etc would be plentiful. I know it was orignally said that it would take about 8 years to clean the site up, but that was nearly 5 years ago now!

[h again]

Spireite61, on Dec 14 2006, 12:22 PM, said:

Have thought all along that the site at Wingerworth would make a far better location for the new ground - plenty of land and Im sure the grants from Europe and English Partnerships etc would be plentiful. I know it was orignally said that it would take about 8 years to clean the site up, but that was nearly 5 years ago now!

They're well on the way with it. I just wonder in my wilder moments if that's the reason for the delay at DEMA. Now if the council were to offer a really big inducement, would it be worth waiting yet more time, although it might only be a few months?

[Town_Fan]

h again, on Dec 14 2006, 09:41 PM, said:

They're well on the way with it. I just wonder in my wilder moments if that's the reason for the delay at DEMA. Now if the council were to offer a really big inducement, would it be worth waiting yet more time, although it might only be a few months?

Conveniently putting aside their local plan?

[h again]

fishini, on Dec 13 2006, 05:30 PM, said:

Well here you are again talking out of your rectum, I would love to insult you but the moderators have warned me not to on the basis that you are not bright enough to notice, they pionted out it would be a waste of my time and space on the board, anyway I was brought up never to mock the afflicted so in your case I won't.

Hello fishi - just found this one. It'll be a black day when the moderators stop you abusing people, in fact it'll mean the end of all those dire posts of yours that give us such a laugh, 'cos you never do anything else. Looking on the bright side, though, it might mean you start presenting some arguments for a change - now that should be REALLY funny.
Good to know the moderators have stepped in to save me from a mauling by an enraged sea creature though - I never realised how close I came to being savaged by those hideous, slimy jaws.

[Mr Mercury]

Town_Fan, on Dec 15 2006, 12:52 AM, said:

Conveniently putting aside their local plan?

Different Council?, I think Wingerworth is N. E. Derbyshire.

Mr Mercury

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 15 December 2006 - 05:23 PM