[Johnnyspireite7]

spireitetoo, on 09 September 2023 - 07:09 PM, said:

Is the resident 🔔end on another enforced holiday ??

Depends who you're classing as the resident 🛎end, the conspiracy theory nut job, the resident troll who thinks Jacobs isn't contributing, the one who wants Tyrer dropping(!), the racist misogynist used car salesman, the one who thinks a striker scoring at a ratio of 4 in 7 isn't working hard enough, there are so many to pick through! 🤣🤣🤣

[spireitetoo]

Johnnyspireite7, on 09 September 2023 - 07:56 PM, said:

Depends who you're classing as the resident 🛎end, the conspiracy theory nut job, the resident troll who thinks Jacobs isn't contributing, the one who wants Tyrer dropping(!), the racist misogynist used car salesman, the one who thinks a striker scoring at a ratio of 4 in 7 isn't working hard enough, there are so many to pick through! 🤣🤣🤣

Out of all them, there's only 1 missing..

The conspiracy theorist.. 🔔end👍

[Holmesc1]

Has he been banned again

[PontePete]

Painted Wagon, on 09 September 2023 - 09:04 AM, said:

I only read the footy section on this board as a rule but have today dipped into the personal section for the first time. Wow, it needs a sub section of ‘let’s get personal’

We’ve already got one Mr Wagon. Here you go, fill yer boots:

http://www.thecfss.c...opic=71345&st=0

[PontePete]

Painted Wagon, on 09 September 2023 - 09:04 AM, said:

I only read the footy section on this board as a rule but have today dipped into the personal section for the first time. Wow, it needs a sub section of ‘let’s get personal’

We’ve already got one Mr Wagon. Here you go, fill yer boots:

http://www.thecfss.c...opic=71345&st=0

[Misnomer]

Johnnyspireite7, on 09 September 2023 - 07:56 PM, said:

Depends who you're classing as the resident ��end, the conspiracy theory nut job, the resident troll who thinks Jacobs isn't contributing, the one who wants Tyrer dropping(!), the racist misogynist used car salesman, the one who thinks a striker scoring at a ratio of 4 in 7 isn't working hard enough, there are so many to pick through! ������

You missed off the lickspittle, know-it-all, sanctimonious xxxxx from your list. Those weak, sad xxxx , who have no independent thought; who contribute to threads just to gain some kind of credence with the more 'popular' folk. The same folk who have absolutely nothing credible to say; their contributions solely being based around slighting others.

There's folk I strongly disagree with on here but, at least I know they actually believe in their own capacity of thought, paradigms and philosophies; then, there's the others.

There's so many to pick through, but some are more obvious than others ��

[s42blue]

Misnomer, on 11 September 2023 - 10:01 AM, said:

The same folk who have absolutely nothing credible to say; their contributions solely being based around slighting others.

Ironic given this post.

Great work with the Bletchley Park code btw. Not offensive on a message board at all.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

s42blue, on 11 September 2023 - 11:52 AM, said:

Ironic given this post.

Great work with the Bletchley Park code btw. Not offensive on a message board at all.

Well clearly the hypocrisy's not restricted to this tragically tortured character.

I mean, surely those who so piously demand e-mails be sent to some should be all over such flagrant use of undisguised profanity...

This post has been edited by The Earl of Chesterfield: 11 September 2023 - 02:51 PM

[s42blue]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 11 September 2023 - 02:18 PM, said:

Well clearly the hypocrisy's not restricted to this tragically tortured character.

I mean, surely those who so piously demand e-mails be sent to some should be all over such flagrant use of undisguised profanity...

You’ve lost me tbh 😂. I’ve forgotten who’s fallen out with who.

[Holmesc1]

Still a deadly silence from archie. Hope hes ok

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 11 September 2023 - 02:18 PM, said:

Well clearly the hypocrisy's not restricted to this tragically tortured character.

I mean, surely those who so piously demand e-mails be sent to some should be all over such flagrant use of undisguised profanity...

Whats all that about you talking in latin or summat

[Goku]

Holmesc1, on 11 September 2023 - 04:30 PM, said:

Whats all that about you talking in latin or summat

People like this are allowed to vote. Mental isn’t it.

[Holmesc1]

Goku, on 11 September 2023 - 07:53 PM, said:

People like this are allowed to vote. Mental isn’t it.

People like what, as far as im concerned anyone over 18 has the right to vote

[Mr Mercury]

Holmesc1, on 11 September 2023 - 08:18 PM, said:

People like what, as far as im concerned anyone over 18 has the right to vote

It’s the woke outlook, wanting to be all things to everyone, multi inclusive etc etc.. but “vote the way I vote or hell hath no fury”.
They’re best humoured or they get all snarky and sulky.

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 11 September 2023 - 08:39 PM

[Goku]

Mr Mercury, on 11 September 2023 - 08:35 PM, said:

It’s the woke outlook.

That word is rotting your brain

Mr Mercury, on 11 September 2023 - 08:35 PM, said:

It’s the woke outlook, wanting to be all things to everyone, multi inclusive etc etc.. but “vote the way I vote or hell hath no fury”.
They’re best humoured or they get all snarky and sulky.

He’s thick as two short planks. That was just my way of calling him thick. Obviously I don’t actually want to take away people’s right to vote, bit worrying that I had to explain that to you but the brain rot has clearly set in judging by your recent offerings.

This post has been edited by Goku: 11 September 2023 - 08:41 PM

[Mr Mercury]

Goku, on 11 September 2023 - 08:39 PM, said:

That word is rotting your brain

Like I said in the edit.. snarky and sulky.

[Mr Mercury]

Goku, on 11 September 2023 - 08:41 PM, said:

That word is rotting your brain



He’s thick as two short planks. That was just my way of calling him thick. Obviously I don’t actually want to take away people’s right to vote, bit worrying that I had to explain that to you but the brain rot has clearly set in judging by your recent offerings.

Calling somebody as thick as two short planks. Right!

[Holmesc1]

Goku, on 11 September 2023 - 08:41 PM, said:

That word is rotting your brain



He’s thick as two short planks. That was just my way of calling him thick. Obviously I don’t actually want to take away people’s right to vote, bit worrying that I had to explain that to you but the brain rot has clearly set in judging by your recent offerings.

Go on then what do you define as been thick again, what is you do for a job again! Just because someone does not have academic qualification does not make them thick. My reply to earl of Chesterfield was tongue in cheek as he was using big words, hope he gets the humour

Mr Mercury, on 11 September 2023 - 08:41 PM, said:

Like I said in the edit.. snarky and sulky.

Based on what on not sure