Clucas
#3
Posted 21 May 2017 - 11:33 PM
#5
Posted 22 May 2017 - 06:06 AM
Mr Mercury, on 22 May 2017 - 06:05 AM, said:
Newcastle have been sniffing since January
#8
Posted 22 May 2017 - 07:23 AM
Sammy Spireite, on 22 May 2017 - 07:10 AM, said:
of which Mansfield will be due some (25% IIRC?)
Haven't they already received their cut when we sold him?
http://www.derbyshir...gthen-1-7378108
This post has been edited by Darcy Sarto: 22 May 2017 - 07:25 AM
#9
Posted 22 May 2017 - 07:33 AM
Darcy Sarto, on 22 May 2017 - 07:23 AM, said:
Saunders quote brings a lump to your throat doesn't it? 'Shopping at M & S not Lidl'. Presumably after that he blew all our available resources on the wages of SEB, Herd and Martinez; rather than a Clucas type replacement at a reasonable fee from say a League Two club.
#10
Posted 22 May 2017 - 07:39 AM
#12
Posted 22 May 2017 - 07:57 AM
JonB, on 22 May 2017 - 07:39 AM, said:
No, they had their percentage after we sold him, any sell on is now ours alone.
#14
Posted 22 May 2017 - 08:15 AM
Mr Mercury, on 22 May 2017 - 07:57 AM, said:
although we don't know the details of this deals, normal 'sell ons' aren't limited.
Hypothetically:
we sold him for £1.3m and Mansfield had a 20% sell on, so we paid them £250k
we then get a further £1m when he's sold by Hull to 'X', Mansfield would then be entitled to another £200k.
of course the rumoured sell on agreement with Hull was said to be 'low' so any % to Mansfield from that would be minimal anyway.
#15
Posted 22 May 2017 - 08:32 AM
Darcy Sarto, on 22 May 2017 - 07:41 AM, said:
Mr Mercury, on 22 May 2017 - 07:57 AM, said:
CFC91, on 22 May 2017 - 08:10 AM, said:
Could well be wrong and all depends on the agreement we reached with Mansfield when buying him but it could be deemed that any sell on we get from Hull is still part of us selling him to which they are entitled a percentage of it.
#17
Posted 22 May 2017 - 08:58 AM
Ernie Ernie Ernie, on 22 May 2017 - 08:47 AM, said:
why not?
a sell on is a percentage on any future fee you receive for a player, so money received as sell on is part of a fee received surely?
I'm sure money filtered down the line when Folan went from Wigan to Hull for £1M and we had to pay Leeds a few £K's
Either way, without knowing the details of Clucas deal to bring him here, or to sell him to Hull, its all hypothetical.
#18
Posted 22 May 2017 - 09:37 AM
Its all going to be down to what agreement was reached but if the sell on is based on any money we receive for said player then money received as part of the sell on is included.
#19
Posted 22 May 2017 - 11:43 AM
Sammy Spireite, on 22 May 2017 - 08:58 AM, said:
a sell on is a percentage on any future fee you receive for a player, so money received as sell on is part of a fee received surely?
I'm sure money filtered down the line when Folan went from Wigan to Hull for £1M and we had to pay Leeds a few £K's
Either way, without knowing the details of Clucas deal to bring him here, or to sell him to Hull, its all hypothetical.
It would be unusual for a second sell on rather than it being the norm.
#20
Posted 22 May 2017 - 12:17 PM
Ernie Ernie Ernie, on 22 May 2017 - 11:43 AM, said:
http://www.derbyshir...lucas-1-8555614