Torquay 10pts confirmed today...
#1
Posted 13 March 2024 - 07:53 PM
#2
Posted 13 March 2024 - 08:11 PM
#3
Posted 13 March 2024 - 08:17 PM
gordon_brittas, on 13 March 2024 - 08:11 PM, said:
I think they've had a very easy ride personally. Do you feel trading unsustainably and accumulating eye-watering debt should be beyond criticism? Take the Kirks out the picture and we'd be well and truly up the creek minus a paddle.
#4
Posted 13 March 2024 - 08:21 PM
Mac, on 13 March 2024 - 08:17 PM, said:
The club would have go under without the trust. Allen was very close to pulling the plug on the club, probably a few months from going the way of Bury and Macclesfield. Yes mistakes have been made but I’m grateful for taking the club on in our hour of need.
#5
Posted 13 March 2024 - 09:31 PM
Mac, on 13 March 2024 - 08:17 PM, said:
If the picture includes the Kirks why would you take them out of the picture?
If you took that lady out of the picture in the Mona Lisa then that painting would be worthless.
So, the Trust saved the Club when it needed saving and have attracted the Kirks when they recognised more finance was needed.
A bit like saving a ship when it was sinking, keeping it afloat and sailing, then getting an onboard motor to give it more power.
Before criticising, ask yourself “could you have done it?”
#6
Posted 13 March 2024 - 10:07 PM
#7
Posted 14 March 2024 - 08:03 AM
dtp, on 13 March 2024 - 09:31 PM, said:
If you took that lady out of the picture in the Mona Lisa then that painting would be worthless.
So, the Trust saved the Club when it needed saving and have attracted the Kirks when they recognised more finance was needed.
A bit like saving a ship when it was sinking, keeping it afloat and sailing, then getting an onboard motor to give it more power.
Before criticising, ask yourself “could you have done it?”
Now that’s some reply. Well done sir 👏🏻
#8
Posted 14 March 2024 - 06:07 PM
#9
Posted 14 March 2024 - 06:48 PM
dtp, on 13 March 2024 - 09:31 PM, said:
If you took that lady out of the picture in the Mona Lisa then that painting would be worthless.
So, the Trust saved the Club when it needed saving and have attracted the Kirks when they recognised more finance was needed.
A bit like saving a ship when it was sinking, keeping it afloat and sailing, then getting an onboard motor to give it more power.
Before criticising, ask yourself “could you have done it?”
Fixed it for you.
'A bit like saving a ship by taking over because the captain can't sail, then realising you can't sail either and asking over the ships tannoy if anyone else fancies a go before the ship hits the rocks'.
It seems like we're in a good place at present, but pretending the trust weren't making a pigs ear of it is disingenuous at best. When it comes to our success of late they come behind our supporters, Paul Cook and the Kirks in terms of honours.
#10
Posted 14 March 2024 - 07:50 PM
Snowflake McBedwetter, on 14 March 2024 - 06:48 PM, said:
'A bit like saving a ship by taking over because the captain can't sail, then realising you can't sail either and asking over the ships tannoy if anyone else fancies a go before the ship hits the rocks'.
It seems like we're in a good place at present, but pretending the trust weren't making a pigs ear of it is disingenuous at best. When it comes to our success of late they come behind our supporters, Paul Cook and the Kirks in terms of honours.
Nobody is pretending that the Trust didn't make mistakes. But why are you pretending that the Trust didn't save the club?
They stepped up. They kept it going through the toughest era of modern day history and then sought help from businessmen who are now taking it on.
To me, it's a successful transitional period because when all is said and done we have a club still to cheer on. If all you think is that they deserve criticism for it then you must be the type of individual who would sue a fireman for flooding a house when putting out a fire.
This post has been edited by metallilad: 14 March 2024 - 07:51 PM
#11
Posted 14 March 2024 - 08:05 PM
#12
Posted 14 March 2024 - 08:30 PM
metallilad, on 14 March 2024 - 07:50 PM, said:
They stepped up. They kept it going through the toughest era of modern day history and then sought help from businessmen who are now taking it on.
To me, it's a successful transitional period because when all is said and done we have a club still to cheer on. If all you think is that they deserve criticism for it then you must be the type of individual who would sue a fireman for flooding a house when putting out a fire.
Well said, total common sense,as opposed to the **** you were replying to.In what should be a season of a lifetime we still have the usual handful of d*** heads trying to undermine any genuine attempts to improve the lot of the club.Making mistakes and then trying to avoid making them again whilst also improving is a massive departure from the class act known as Carson.
#13
Posted 14 March 2024 - 09:14 PM
JonB, on 14 March 2024 - 08:05 PM, said:
Didn't catch that bit, so to save relistening to the whole lot did MG mean days from liquidation had the Trust not taken over or days from liquidation had the Kirks not?
#14
Posted 14 March 2024 - 09:18 PM
The Earl of Chesterfield, on 14 March 2024 - 09:14 PM, said:
On the below link there are a 5 or 6 mins at the end after the Kirk’s where Mike Goodwin is interviewed. He mentions that it was days from liquidation had the trust not taken over from DA.
https://www.bbc.co.u...s/play/p0hjlmy1
#16
Posted 14 March 2024 - 09:18 PM
The Earl of Chesterfield, on 14 March 2024 - 09:14 PM, said:
If the trust hadn’t taken over because DA had made it quite clear that was that, no more funding the club.
#17
Posted 14 March 2024 - 09:32 PM
Way I see it the Trust did pretty much what the CFSS did twenty years before - behave like a St Johns ambulance crew called to a critically injured casualty.
Well meaning amateurs doing their best under emergency circumstances.
Yes they ballsed up. Badly on occasion. And there were one or two far too close to the previous regime to remain around.
But without them we'd probably be a Bury, Darlington or Chester...
#18
Posted 14 March 2024 - 09:48 PM
The Earl of Chesterfield, on 14 March 2024 - 09:32 PM, said:
Way I see it the Trust did pretty much what the CFSS did twenty years before - behave like a St Johns ambulance crew called to a critically injured casualty.
Well meaning amateurs doing their best under emergency circumstances.
Yes they ballsed up. Badly on occasion. And there were one or two far too close to the previous regime to remain around.
But without them we'd probably be a Bury, Darlington or Chester...
Which is the reason for my curt response to the usual suspects throwing abuse at the Trust,I assume at the time as fans, they were more concerned with saving the club than worrying if their business accumen was enough.Yes there are areas/personnel/actions that in hindsight were not going to please everyone or even succeed,but thanks to them we still have a club which in my eyes is still the only overriding issue.
#19
Posted 14 March 2024 - 10:41 PM
I couldn't understand characters who defended the previous regime at the time. Especially the one or two - okay, perhaps make that 'one' - who'd rather sneer at whistle blowing fans instead. But surely this is final confirmation that whatever Allen achieved in his early years, any faith in those he appointed to run CFC was entirely misplaced...
#20
Posted 14 March 2024 - 11:07 PM
The Earl of Chesterfield, on 14 March 2024 - 10:41 PM, said:
I couldn't understand characters who defended the previous regime at the time. Especially the one or two - okay, perhaps make that 'one' - who'd rather sneer at whistle blowing fans instead. But surely this is final confirmation that whatever Allen achieved in his early years, any faith in those he appointed to run CFC was entirely misplaced...
Carson is deplorable. Pitiful, pathetic excuse for a businessman. Cannot stand the man.