s43spire, on 22 February 2017 - 11:26 AM, said:
First, Carson's statement confirms the bid from, as you put it, a 'fkin Swedish consortium' was legitimate. So it's not a case of 'this board harping on', infact it was 'this board' that demonstrated how misleading his earlier statements actually were.
Then, were these bidders made aware of what you again dub 'proper motions'? Because the evidence suggests they were handed a brief, instantly dismissive rejection rather than being instructed to contact Allen's representatives.
Your post suggests you'd rather trust AC than 'Bob's Board' members, yet whatever the credibility of this bid he's yet again contradicted his earlier comments.
Other's may use a somewhat less charitable term.
This post has been edited by MDCCCLXVI: 22 February 2017 - 03:40 PM