Bob's Board - Chesterfield FC: Agm Thursday - Bob's Board - Chesterfield FC

Jump to content

  • (9 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Agm Thursday

#141 User is offline   Mr Mercury 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 35,571
  • Joined: 06-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:My family and Chesterfield then anything else that I care to chance my arm at.

Posted 24 October 2014 - 07:25 PM

View Postvalemadness, on 24 October 2014 - 06:44 PM, said:

DA interview with Chesterfield Post
http://www.chesterfi...c_00001048.html

No disrespect to any of the other media outlets, but that lass can interview!
East stand second class citizen.
0

#142 User is offline   azul 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 34,127
  • Joined: 15-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 October 2014 - 07:26 PM

View Postzigger-zagger, on 24 October 2014 - 07:04 PM, said:

So to pay off the debt we have to reach the championship.......hmmmmm..... casino accounting...... one hell of a gamble...... tick....tock....tick....tock

His money
Accentuate th Positive, eliminate the negative
0

#143 User is offline   Mr Mercury 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 35,571
  • Joined: 06-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:My family and Chesterfield then anything else that I care to chance my arm at.

Posted 24 October 2014 - 07:28 PM

View Postfreelander2, on 24 October 2014 - 06:23 PM, said:

At the last AGM, Dave Allen told fans not to worry about the debt and that it was under control. 12 months on:

1) An 18.2% increase in Turnover from £5,360,735 to £6,335,342.

2) Our wage bill for the entire business increased by 20% from £3,330,671 to £3,995,123.

3) Our trading loss increased by 142.7% from (£438,459) to (£1,063,818).

4) We’ve seen the amount owed to Creditors increase by 21.8%, from £6,730,946 to £8,200,427.

5) A 38.2% decrease in the net worth of the business, from £2,786,730 down to £1,722,912.


Even last night, Dave Allen assured Shareholders that the debt was under control and that the business is heading in the right direction. Now either Dave has took leave of his senses or he thinks a lot of us are naïve.

As far as I’m concerned the business was clearly out of control last year and I suspect, still is:

1) We budgeted for gates of 7,000, yet failed to monitor our greatest income stream and continued to spend as if we were actually achieving the target. Turner actually revealed last night, that all the staff had a pay increase last financial year, was he not monitoring the P&L statement each month when he/the Board decided to award salary increases right across the business?

2) We entered into fixed bonus agreements with the football staff without assessing the liability to the business and whether or not the business could adequately fund those payments.

3) We failed badly to manage and promote the concerts, a weekend that should have been a massive pay day for the Club.

Chris Turner has been on my radar for a long time now, he’s well & truly out of his comfort zone. Even last night, when he was trying to make Sheridan out to be a sh’head in terms of player salaries, etc, what both Turner & Cook failed to mention was that the last time we were promoted, our wage bill for the entire business was £752K less than last season, with a very similar headcount. So this notion that Cook is delivering more for less is tripe, he’s delivering more at a cost.

Given Dave Allen’s objectives for the business, reaffirmed again last night, for it to trade profitably and reduce the level of debt, the summer that Turner had in the media and this latest set of results, I’m surprised he’s still in a job. Dave Allen aside, we have a couple of Directors that have done well for themselves, would Turner still be in employment in their businesses had he produced those results and shown the lack of financial understanding that he has, I suspect not.

I must admit, Turner left me speechless last night, when he claimed that the only way to repay the debt would be to get into the Championship! I had considered asking him by how much would the debt have to increase by to get into the Championship and how many years in the Championship would it take to clear the debt, but I thought better of it, the answer would have been long winded and without any numerical reference.

Thankfully, the problems at CFC are not my concern.

I'm sure there are ways and means where everything is not as black and white as you've typed..but it's pretty damned thorough. Now a point by point answer from CT would be interesting...plus from me mate.
East stand second class citizen.
0

#144 User is offline   Tylerdurdencfc 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,462
  • Joined: 04-March 08

Posted 24 October 2014 - 08:03 PM

Wouldn't the pay-off of Sheridan and co be in these accounts?
0

#145 User is offline   Westbars Spireite 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 63,409
  • Joined: 18-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield, Derbyshire
  • Interests:Chesterfield FC, cricket, beer

Posted 24 October 2014 - 08:05 PM

View Postfreelander2, on 24 October 2014 - 06:23 PM, said:

At the last AGM, Dave Allen told fans not to worry about the debt and that it was under control. 12 months on:

1) An 18.2% increase in Turnover from £5,360,735 to £6,335,342.

2) Our wage bill for the entire business increased by 20% from £3,330,671 to £3,995,123.

3) Our trading loss increased by 142.7% from (£438,459) to (£1,063,818).

4) We’ve seen the amount owed to Creditors increase by 21.8%, from £6,730,946 to £8,200,427.

5) A 38.2% decrease in the net worth of the business, from £2,786,730 down to £1,722,912.


Even last night, Dave Allen assured Shareholders that the debt was under control and that the business is heading in the right direction. Now either Dave has took leave of his senses or he thinks a lot of us are naïve.

As far as I’m concerned the business was clearly out of control last year and I suspect, still is:

1) We budgeted for gates of 7,000, yet failed to monitor our greatest income stream and continued to spend as if we were actually achieving the target. Turner actually revealed last night, that all the staff had a pay increase last financial year, was he not monitoring the P&L statement each month when he/the Board decided to award salary increases right across the business?

2) We entered into fixed bonus agreements with the football staff without assessing the liability to the business and whether or not the business could adequately fund those payments.

3) We failed badly to manage and promote the concerts, a weekend that should have been a massive pay day for the Club.

Chris Turner has been on my radar for a long time now, he’s well & truly out of his comfort zone. Even last night, when he was trying to make Sheridan out to be a sh’head in terms of player salaries, etc, what both Turner & Cook failed to mention was that the last time we were promoted, our wage bill for the entire business was £752K less than last season, with a very similar headcount. So this notion that Cook is delivering more for less is tripe, he’s delivering more at a cost.

Given Dave Allen’s objectives for the business, reaffirmed again last night, for it to trade profitably and reduce the level of debt, the summer that Turner had in the media and this latest set of results, I’m surprised he’s still in a job. Dave Allen aside, we have a couple of Directors that have done well for themselves, would Turner still be in employment in their businesses had he produced those results and shown the lack of financial understanding that he has, I suspect not.

I must admit, Turner left me speechless last night, when he claimed that the only way to repay the debt would be to get into the Championship! I had considered asking him by how much would the debt have to increase by to get into the Championship and how many years in the Championship would it take to clear the debt, but I thought better of it, the answer would have been long winded and without any numerical reference.

Thankfully, the problems at CFC are not my concern.


The way I see it too.
0

#146 User is offline   azul 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 34,127
  • Joined: 15-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 October 2014 - 08:07 PM

View PostTylerdurdencfc, on 24 October 2014 - 08:03 PM, said:

Wouldn't the pay-off of Sheridan and co be in these accounts?

Sheridan has been gone for over two years, unless the payoff was delayed I would doubt it

Think we have already used that excuse for the last set of losses

This post has been edited by azul: 24 October 2014 - 08:35 PM

Accentuate th Positive, eliminate the negative
0

#147 User is offline   Wooden Spoon 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 42,654
  • Joined: 07-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 October 2014 - 09:54 PM

View Postvalemadness, on 24 October 2014 - 06:44 PM, said:

DA interview with Chesterfield Post
http://www.chesterfi...c_00001048.html



Wage bill for players £1,800,000
A new hope.
0

#148 User is offline   Mr Mercury 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 35,571
  • Joined: 06-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:My family and Chesterfield then anything else that I care to chance my arm at.

Posted 24 October 2014 - 10:00 PM

View Posta kick in the balls, on 24 October 2014 - 09:54 PM, said:

Wage bill for players £1,800,000

1.6-1.8
East stand second class citizen.
0

#149 User is offline   Wooden Spoon 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 42,654
  • Joined: 07-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 October 2014 - 10:17 PM

View PostMr Mercury, on 24 October 2014 - 10:00 PM, said:

1.6-1.8



yes, but if it was 1.6 you would say 1.6. 30% sell on to Hull for Cooper as well.
A new hope.
0

#150 User is offline   azul 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 34,127
  • Joined: 15-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 October 2014 - 10:32 PM

View Posta kick in the balls, on 24 October 2014 - 09:54 PM, said:

Wage bill for players £1,800,000


Over £2M elsewhere then :o
Accentuate th Positive, eliminate the negative
0

#151 User is offline   Westbars Spireite 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 63,409
  • Joined: 18-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield, Derbyshire
  • Interests:Chesterfield FC, cricket, beer

Posted 24 October 2014 - 10:39 PM

View Postazul, on 24 October 2014 - 10:32 PM, said:

Over £2M elsewhere then :o


That surprised me too.
0

#152 User is offline   Mr Mercury 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 35,571
  • Joined: 06-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:My family and Chesterfield then anything else that I care to chance my arm at.

Posted 24 October 2014 - 10:49 PM

View Posta kick in the balls, on 24 October 2014 - 10:17 PM, said:

yes, but if it was 1.6 you would say 1.6. 30% sell on to Hull for Cooper as well.

And we , apparently, got him for nowt..not the six figure fee sometimes quoted on here!
East stand second class citizen.
0

#153 User is offline   azul 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 34,127
  • Joined: 15-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 October 2014 - 11:04 PM

View PostWestbars Spireite, on 24 October 2014 - 10:39 PM, said:

That surprised me too.

We seem to have managers of this and managers of that, so in some way it doesn't surprise me that much even though many jobs will be minimum wage and/or part time.
Accentuate th Positive, eliminate the negative
0

#154 User is offline   moondog 

  • Legend
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 26,814
  • Joined: 09-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield

Posted 24 October 2014 - 11:56 PM

View PostMr Mercury, on 24 October 2014 - 07:25 PM, said:

No disrespect to any of the other media outlets, but that lass can interview!


Agreed Karen is very good
0

#155 User is offline   The Earl of Chesterfield 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 25,752
  • Joined: 24-February 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:With the Rainbow People

Posted 25 October 2014 - 06:57 AM

View Postfreelander2, on 24 October 2014 - 06:23 PM, said:

At the last AGM, Dave Allen told fans not to worry about the debt and that it was under control. 12 months on:

1) An 18.2% increase in Turnover from £5,360,735 to £6,335,342.

2) Our wage bill for the entire business increased by 20% from £3,330,671 to £3,995,123.

3) Our trading loss increased by 142.7% from (£438,459) to (£1,063,818).

4) We’ve seen the amount owed to Creditors increase by 21.8%, from £6,730,946 to £8,200,427.

5) A 38.2% decrease in the net worth of the business, from £2,786,730 down to £1,722,912.


Even last night, Dave Allen assured Shareholders that the debt was under control and that the business is heading in the right direction. Now either Dave has took leave of his senses or he thinks a lot of us are naïve.

As far as I’m concerned the business was clearly out of control last year and I suspect, still is:

1) We budgeted for gates of 7,000, yet failed to monitor our greatest income stream and continued to spend as if we were actually achieving the target. Turner actually revealed last night, that all the staff had a pay increase last financial year, was he not monitoring the P&L statement each month when he/the Board decided to award salary increases right across the business?

2) We entered into fixed bonus agreements with the football staff without assessing the liability to the business and whether or not the business could adequately fund those payments.

3) We failed badly to manage and promote the concerts, a weekend that should have been a massive pay day for the Club.

Chris Turner has been on my radar for a long time now, he’s well & truly out of his comfort zone. Even last night, when he was trying to make Sheridan out to be a sh’head in terms of player salaries, etc, what both Turner & Cook failed to mention was that the last time we were promoted, our wage bill for the entire business was £752K less than last season, with a very similar headcount. So this notion that Cook is delivering more for less is tripe, he’s delivering more at a cost.

Given Dave Allen’s objectives for the business, reaffirmed again last night, for it to trade profitably and reduce the level of debt, the summer that Turner had in the media and this latest set of results, I’m surprised he’s still in a job. Dave Allen aside, we have a couple of Directors that have done well for themselves, would Turner still be in employment in their businesses had he produced those results and shown the lack of financial understanding that he has, I suspect not.

I must admit, Turner left me speechless last night, when he claimed that the only way to repay the debt would be to get into the Championship! I had considered asking him by how much would the debt have to increase by to get into the Championship and how many years in the Championship would it take to clear the debt, but I thought better of it, the answer would have been long winded and without any numerical reference.

Thankfully, the problems at CFC are not my concern.


I wonder just how much DA really knows about day-to-day events at CFC.

I wonder if he's a bloke more interested in his pigeons, who occasionally ventures down to Sheffield Road only to be told what folk want him to hear, and has a 'black and white' view of the World meaning he's all too ready to accept simplistic stories for failings and losses.

It's the old regime to blame...Sheridan...Marc Richards...the punters...Tom Jones...

If he's cool with the situation then I'm truly grateful, but I wonder if he's being let down by individuals either incompetent or worse.
Spanish proverb: 'Pessimists are just well informed optimists'
1

#156 User is offline   Freddie 

  • Youth Team Player
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 435
  • Joined: 10-September 14

Posted 25 October 2014 - 08:00 AM

View PostTylerdurdencfc, on 24 October 2014 - 08:03 PM, said:

Wouldn't the pay-off of Sheridan and co be in these accounts?

That was my understanding, and CT also mentioned that in total (if my memory is correct) around £700,000 had been paid out to cover redundancies and paying up previous suppliers contractual requirements during his time at the club.
0

#157 User is offline   Westbars Spireite 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 63,409
  • Joined: 18-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield, Derbyshire
  • Interests:Chesterfield FC, cricket, beer

Posted 25 October 2014 - 08:06 AM

What a waste of cash.
0

#158 User is offline   hewittfan 

  • Reserve Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,385
  • Joined: 09-March 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Newbold

Posted 25 October 2014 - 08:17 AM

View PostFreddie, on 25 October 2014 - 08:00 AM, said:

That was my understanding, and CT also mentioned that in total (if my memory is correct) around £700,000 had been paid out to cover redundancies and paying up previous suppliers contractual requirements during his time at the club.

He said £750,000 in fact. However, I don't see how these accounts can include anything relating to Sheridan and co, because as stated above, they left two years ago, so those costs should have been accrued in full in last years accounts even if part of the payment was still outstanding.
0

#159 User is offline   Guest_freelander2_* 

  • *Deleted*
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: *Deleted*
  • Posts: 11,866
  • Joined: 24-December 09
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 25 October 2014 - 09:28 AM

View PostMDCCCLXVI, on 25 October 2014 - 06:57 AM, said:

I wonder just how much DA really knows about day-to-day events at CFC.

I wonder if he's a bloke more interested in his pigeons, who occasionally ventures down to Sheffield Road only to be told what folk want him to hear, and has a 'black and white' view of the World meaning he's all too ready to accept simplistic stories for failings and losses.

It's the old regime to blame...Sheridan...Marc Richards...the punters...Tom Jones...

If he's cool with the situation then I'm truly grateful, but I wonder if he's being let down by individuals either incompetent or worse.

There was even a jibe at the old Finance Director who left the business last November for the way he recorded 'other operating costs'. Now considering the fact that Dave Allen's been on the Board now for 5+ years and in that time Chaired many Board Meetings, I'm surprised it's taken this long to change the way in which management information was presented if he wasn't happy with it.

Out of interest, I've looked at some of the Club's old accounts:

2003
T/O: £1,992,807
Loss: (£212,950)

2004
T/O: £2,064,516
Loss: (£181,724)

2005
T/O: £2,401,223
Profit: £144,359

2006
T/O: £2,318,768
Loss: (£59,948)

2007
T/O: £2,846,513
Profit: £88,069

2008
T/O: £2,642,408
Loss: (£24,706)

2009
T/O: Abbreviated Accounts
Loss: (£166,231)

2010
T/O: £3,030,218
Loss: (£936,822) A lot of this loss was attributed to initial works at Dema

2011
T/O: £5,804,119
Loss: (£22,377)

2012
T/O: £6,348,724
Profit: £80,559

2013
T/O: £5,360,735
Loss: (£438,459)

2014
T/O: £6,335,342
Loss: (£1,063,818)

I'm not a fan of the old Board, but prior to Dave Allen's involvement we averaged losses of £59K pa (2003-2009), now we're averaging losses of £476K pa (2010-2014). In fact, since Barrie Hubbard was pushed out and Chris Turner given free reign, we've averaged losses of £751K pa (2013-2014).

This post has been edited by freelander2: 25 October 2014 - 09:31 AM

0

#160 User is offline   azul 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 34,127
  • Joined: 15-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 October 2014 - 09:52 AM

View Postfreelander2, on 25 October 2014 - 09:28 AM, said:

There was even a jibe at the old Finance Director who left the business last November for the way he recorded 'other operating costs'. Now considering the fact that Dave Allen's been on the Board now for 5+ years and in that time Chaired many Board Meetings, I'm surprised it's taken this long to change the way in which management information was presented if he wasn't happy with it.

Out of interest, I've looked at some of the Club's old accounts:

2003
T/O: £1,992,807
Loss: (£212,950)

2004
T/O: £2,064,516
Loss: (£181,724)

2005
T/O: £2,401,223
Profit: £144,359

2006
T/O: £2,318,768
Loss: (£59,948)

2007
T/O: £2,846,513
Profit: £88,069

2008
T/O: £2,642,408
Loss: (£24,706)

2009
T/O: Abbreviated Accounts
Loss: (£166,231)

2010
T/O: £3,030,218
Loss: (£936,822) A lot of this loss was attributed to initial works at Dema

2011
T/O: £5,804,119
Loss: (£22,377)

2012
T/O: £6,348,724
Profit: £80,559

2013
T/O: £5,360,735
Loss: (£438,459)

2014
T/O: £6,335,342
Loss: (£1,063,818)

I'm not a fan of the old Board, but prior to Dave Allen's involvement we averaged losses of £59K pa (2003-2009), now we're averaging losses of £476K pa (2010-2014). In fact, since Barrie Hubbard was pushed out and Chris Turner given free reign, we've averaged losses of £751K pa (2013-2014).


Well let's hope the faith DA has shown in Turner starts paying dividends on and off the field
Accentuate th Positive, eliminate the negative
0

Share this topic:


  • (9 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users