[hardgums]

Look, I know, every side that loses in front of the Sky cameras complains about the bias of the commentary, but seriously.....! Even the most dispassionate of supporters cannot have failed to have seen tonight's punditry as a complete Walsall love-in.

[dart in the crossbar]

hardgums, on 16 May 2025 - 09:26 PM, said:

Look, I know, every side that loses in front of the Sky cameras complains about the bias of the commentary, but seriously.....! Even the most dispassionate of supporters cannot have failed to have seen tonight's punditry as a complete Walsall love-in.

When the ball went into their crowd around 10 minutes Gordon was waiting to take a throw near to the corner at their end. They eventually threw the ball on. The sky camera shot showed someone in their crowd doing what looked like an 'ooo, ooo' chant towards Gordon. Obviously it may not have been that (there were no arm gestures) but it looked like that's what it was.

[Mr Mercury]

hardgums, on 16 May 2025 - 09:26 PM, said:

Look, I know, every side that loses in front of the Sky cameras complains about the bias of the commentary, but seriously.....! Even the most dispassionate of supporters cannot have failed to have seen tonight's punditry as a complete Walsall love-in.

Picked that up right from the start of the show and called on the ingame thread.

[azul]

Mr Mercury, on 16 May 2025 - 09:32 PM, said:

Picked that up right from the start of the show and called on the ingame thread.

The choice of the so called pundits confirmed that. On the other hand I didn't think the commentary was that bad.

[Siberian Spireite]

Can’t blame them for having Nathan Lowe on, and he was fine.

[azul]

Siberian Spireite, on 16 May 2025 - 09:51 PM, said:

Can’t blame them for having Nathan Lowe on, and he was fine.

Perhaps they should have a pundit on with a Chesterfield connection. From memory that seems the norm.

This post has been edited by azul: 16 May 2025 - 09:54 PM