Keepers Going Down Injured Yesterday and others
#1
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:05 AM
Points from this - yesterday, their 'keeper' did this a number of times. I wonder how much this disease has spread through the game.
Surely, we have got to destroy this new 'cheating phenonemon' - I'm sure it is new - as I and others pay money to watch the equivaolent of 90mins football - not 84 because of lack of appropriate injury time added on. The Q is how do the authorities tackle such abuse of the game?
#2
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:16 AM
#3
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:17 AM
Hibbo98, on 12 May 2025 - 10:16 AM, said:
suggested something similar but for longer - 3 minutes for example. also would ban all players from going to the touchline.
#4
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:18 AM
#5
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:20 AM
#6
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:24 AM
JonB, on 12 May 2025 - 10:20 AM, said:
This would be an improvement but not a complete fix because teams don't just use this to get instructions across, they use it to take the steam out of the game, so you could still have the keeper going down for a few minutes and achieve that objective even if you do stop players running to the touchline and speaking with staff.
#7
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:24 AM
#8
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:27 AM
Goku, on 12 May 2025 - 10:24 AM, said:
agree. you never see a keeper going down when their own team is pressing at the other end. Always when they are under pressure. It is the equivalent of allowing a boxer to put a knee down and have a 3 minute break before resuming the round
#9
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:28 AM
how do you stop it? not sure.
i like the point about stopping the players going across to the touchline, that takes that bit out of it. If gk sub was excluded from the 5 we can make, could the officials be given powers to say, if a second stoppage occurs they invoke an auto gk substitution? that way we only have to endure the pantomime once per game.
#10
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:32 AM
#11
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:32 AM
#12
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:34 AM
BreadNoButter, on 12 May 2025 - 10:32 AM, said:
1. Because even if we do it (I'm not certain that we do, certainly not to the amount we saw yesterday) why would you not want the game to naturally flow more? Do you enjoy the breaks in play or something? What a weird thing to say.
2. Where can we view this data for how many times Boot goes down when we're winning by a goal? Please share.
#13
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:37 AM
BreadNoButter, on 12 May 2025 - 10:32 AM, said:
What stats did you uncover?
Yorkshire is Yorkshire
Never the twain shall meet.
Again
#14
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:38 AM
#15
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:40 AM
If the injury is genuine the sub keeper can always come on straight away, or before the ten minutes has elapsed.
As said elsewhere - no interaction (beyond normal shouted instructions) between players and coaches during this, or during any time that the game is suspended for injury.
Look at the whole issue of repeated drinks breaks. I think there was a home game this season where we had three in the first half hour. Any team that works on fitness and durability has any possible advantage negated by the fact that the opponents can take a slurp every ten minutes, so no drinks breaks for any reason. So a player might get a bit of a dab on? Pace yourselves. We managed to win a World Cup in the summer of 66 without everyone going for a gargle every ten minutes.
#16
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:40 AM
Goku, on 12 May 2025 - 10:34 AM, said:
2. Where can we view this data for how many times Boot goes down when we're winning by a goal? Please share.
Of course, I’d prefer it to get punished but it’s only getting brought up cause we are being sour about the result yesterday, and their keeper got under afew skins.
I never said I’d saw statistics, Watch the highlights back of every game from the 70th-80th min where we’ve been winning by 1. Think I counted around 3 times where boot went down and had physio on. It happens get over it
#17
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:43 AM
#18
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:51 AM
BreadNoButter, on 12 May 2025 - 10:43 AM, said:
So if the keeper's antics weren't having an influence on the game, why was he doing it and so professionally unprofessional?
Surely his pay masters would have put a stop to it.
BreadNoButter, on 12 May 2025 - 10:40 AM, said:
I never said I’d saw statistics, Watch the highlights back of every game from the 70th-80th min where we’ve been winning by 1. Think I counted around 3 times where boot went down and had physio on. It happens get over it
Gives the impression that you are guessing
Yorkshire is Yorkshire
Never the twain shall meet.
Again
#19
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:53 AM
SocraticCFC, on 12 May 2025 - 10:05 AM, said:
Points from this - yesterday, their 'keeper' did this a number of times. I wonder how much this disease has spread through the game.
Surely, we have got to destroy this new 'cheating phenonemon' - I'm sure it is new - as I and others pay money to watch the equivaolent of 90mins football - not 84 because of lack of appropriate injury time added on. The Q is how do the authorities tackle such abuse of the game?
My take on this is that its a poor spectacle for those who pay to watch a football match, most keepers do it because they are instructed to do so is my guess. Tyrer did it a few times when playing for us and it used to wind me up just the same as if an opposing keeper did it. In my opinion, they do it for two reasons, to kill the momentum of the opposing team and to waste time. Wasting time doesn't really work though as the ref just adds it on at the end. To stop it from happening all the ref has to do is call the physio on the pitch then like an outfield player the keeper goes off but for a minimum of 2 mins or he is substituted. That would stop it.
#20
Posted 12 May 2025 - 10:54 AM
BreadNoButter, on 12 May 2025 - 10:40 AM, said:
What minutes did it happen v Accrington?