Bob's Board: The Labour Thread - Bob's Board

Jump to content

  • (308 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 306
  • 307
  • 308
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The Labour Thread Rate Topic: -----

#6141 User is online   isleaiw1 

  • Key Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9,794
  • Joined: 04-March 15

Posted Today, 11:54 AM

View PostGoku, on 09 May 2025 - 10:50 AM, said:

I was reading about how when Labour were in opposition they pledged to increase research & development to 3.5% of GDP which I'm lead to believe drives the value add end of the economy, so is incredibly important. Now they're in power, they've only announced £13.9B for R&D which is a real-terms cut due to inflation. Plus, they've cut UK research and innovation. So, it seems we'll just stagnate unless something drastic changes.

We're happy, however, to spend billion after billion on the elderly. Pensioners basically have most countries in Europe in a headlock. Look at the farcical, pearl-clutching screeching exhibited by most of the country when Labour decided to means test the WFP. Imagine if we did what we actually need to do and scrap the triple lock. It needs doing, but nobody can do it because they'd be destroyed at the polling booth. So we'll continue our death spiral.

Speaking broadly, pensioners irritate and block (which costs money) at every opportunity via their NIMBY-ism to stop the country from developing. They stop house prices from reducing. They are the most selfish voting cohort - the experts at pulling the ladder up behind them.

And as such, we must eliminate them all.


The trile lock is of minor expense compared to the true cost of public sector pensions... add those to your crusade please.

If house prices fall then everyone will feel worse off who already has a house. That affects confidence and that affects spending. Lots would walk away as they would be in negative equity which would affect the banking sector. And of course house prices are falling in real terms as they are not rising as quickly as general inflation of pay these days...

One of the biggest issues is too many people not working or not wanting to progress and earn more and therefore pay more in. That could be students at uni, old folk who want to work but are overlooked due to ageism, or just the ridiculous tax system that means if you have kids at nursery you are better off earning £99k than £130k...

Lots of issues beyond just the triple lock, and a chunk of them fall at the door of your generation (and my kids, I include them in this..)
Stay Home. Stay Safe.
-1

#6142 User is online   isleaiw1 

  • Key Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9,794
  • Joined: 04-March 15

Posted Today, 11:57 AM

View PostGoku, on 09 May 2025 - 11:41 AM, said:

Labour have protected jobs which were under threat due to the actions of Orange Man. From what I can tell, it's probably the best they could've done given the country's position and we haven't conceded much. Nothing like Johnson's Australia deal which was mocked on telly down under and was entirely one way. As usual, your anti-Labour bias means you can't see the wood through the trees despite your professed centrism. Don't worry; you're in fine company. Plenty for you to go at Labour with, this isn't one of them.


It may well be the best we could get, but Starmer cannot claim it as victory. The orange one has done him over and the Chinese will probably get a better more balanced deal than us...

Anti politicians by the way, they are all rubbish. The sad thing is that this lot arent any better than the last and they were the worst ever...

They started well - we need change. And all they have done is tinker round the edges...
Stay Home. Stay Safe.
-1

#6143 User is offline   Goku 

  • Super Saiyan and saviour of the universe
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 36,723
  • Joined: 10-August 07
  • Gender:Male

Posted Today, 12:02 PM

View Postisleaiw1, on 09 May 2025 - 11:57 AM, said:

They started well - we need change. And all they have done is tinker round the edges...


Now that we do agree on
0

#6144 User is offline   Burgerman 

  • Reserve Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 783
  • Joined: 02-October 24

Posted Today, 01:45 PM

View PostGoku, on 09 May 2025 - 10:50 AM, said:


Speaking broadly, pensioners irritate and block (which costs money) at every opportunity via their NIMBY-ism to stop the country from developing. They stop house prices from reducing. They are the most selfish voting cohort - the experts at pulling the ladder up behind them.

And as such, we must eliminate them all.

Can you provide links please to back this up?
0

#6145 User is offline   Goku 

  • Super Saiyan and saviour of the universe
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 36,723
  • Joined: 10-August 07
  • Gender:Male

Posted Today, 02:01 PM

 Burgerman, on 09 May 2025 - 01:45 PM, said:

Can you provide links please to back this up?


Probably, but not right now xxx
0

#6146 User is online   Mr Mercury 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 39,313
  • Joined: 06-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:My family and Chesterfield then anything else that I care to chance my arm at.

Posted Today, 03:33 PM

So is it a good deal or not?


Jonathan Reynolds on 7 April: no US deal is worth it if the 10% tariffs stay.

Jonathan Reynolds yesterday: It’s a great deal!

The man who didn’t realise for 20 years that he wasn’t a qualified solicitor is now running Britain’s global trade 😐

God help us.
East stand second class citizen.
1

Share this topic:


  • (308 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 306
  • 307
  • 308
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users