[fishini]

Strange how soppy, hidiot and the rest of them disappear at times like this is it not? Must be an X file

[Phil]

fishini, on Nov 11 2006, 09:16 PM, said:

Strange how soppy, hidiot and the rest of them disappear at times like this is it not? Must be an X file

or x factor

[Hoare (400)]

Spireitephil, on Nov 11 2006, 09:17 PM, said:

or x factor

If i was them i would be having a lot of castlemaine xxxx. LOL

But not the same xxxx the players obviously dont give!

Hoare (400)

[lubic]

fishini, on Nov 11 2006, 11:16 PM, said:

Strange how soppy, hidiot and the rest of them disappear at times like this is it not? Must be an X file

Without wanting to be labeled, you're being hypocritical. Your silence after a resounding victory is always deafening.

[Town_Fan]

Paul, on Nov 11 2006, 11:12 PM, said:

Without wanting to be labeled, you're being hypocritical. Your silence after a resounding victory is always deafening.

Doesnt happen very often though does it?

[lubic]

Town_Fan, on Nov 12 2006, 01:27 AM, said:

Doesnt happen very often though does it?

That's beside the point. Fishini always manages to turn out reams and reams of posts saying pretty much the same thing after a bad performance, yet had nothing to say on Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday. I've stopped caring about what he writes but this is pot/kettle to the extreme.

[Blue]

Why do you reply to Fishini posts if u don't care, unfortunately his posts are for the blinkered, everybody else agrees

[lubic]

Blue, on Nov 12 2006, 01:37 AM, said:

Why do you reply to Fishini posts if u don't care, unfortunately his posts are for the blinkered, everybody else agrees

I generally don't. I wasn't replying to a particular point he made about anything (they're generally tiresome and any sense within them is masked by the foaming-at-the-mouth impression he gives). It was the hypocracy that got me this time.

[h again]

fishini, on Nov 11 2006, 09:16 PM, said:

Strange how soppy, hidiot and the rest of them disappear at times like this is it not? Must be an X file

The really strange thing is the way this board always fills up with your whinings when we lose, but after a win you disappear. Face it, you love us to lose, you'd love us to go down, and you'd love the new stadium to fall through - and all so that you can tell yourself how clever you are. In that opinion you're a minority of one.

[Town_Fan]

h again, on Nov 12 2006, 01:28 AM, said:

The really strange thing is the way this board always fills up with your whinings when we lose, but after a win you disappear. Face it, you love us to lose, you'd love us to go down, and you'd love the new stadium to fall through - and all so that you can tell yourself how clever you are. In that opinion you're a minority of one.

You just dont get it do you? Its not about wanting those things to happen its about realising that those things are likely to happen because of the messed up way this club is owned and managed. I was going to say you continue to defend the indefensible yet you cant even do that now its gotten so bad, you prefer to make snide comments and ignore the reality of whats going on.

[Wooden Spoon]

h again, on Nov 12 2006, 01:28 AM, said:

Face it, you love us to lose,

i doubt there is a single town fan who wants us to lose. i certainly dont. i hate it when we lose.

h again, on Nov 12 2006, 01:28 AM, said:

you'd love us to go down,

i am worried about going down. the loss of extra revenue could be a fatal blow. wasnt hurst goal worth an alledged £250k? so i really really really dont want us to go down.

h again, on Nov 12 2006, 01:28 AM, said:

and you'd love the new stadium to fall through

no. i want it to work because the club needs the money.the club desperatly needs the money.

h again, on Nov 12 2006, 01:28 AM, said:

In that opinion you're a minority of one.

i think its you in the minority.

This post has been edited by death: 12 November 2006 - 12:09 PM

[malcolmr13]

Town_Fan, on Nov 12 2006, 01:58 AM, said:

You just dont get it do you? Its not about wanting those things to happen its about realising that those things are likely to happen because of the messed up way this club is owned and managed. I was going to say you continue to defend the indefensible yet you cant even do that now its gotten so bad, you prefer to make snide comments and ignore the reality of whats going on.

I hesitate to step into somewhere near the middle of this but surely we are talking about differing perceptions of what the future holds.
I think we will stay up; get a new ground and to complete the hat trick, arrive at a more secure CFC organisation in the near future.
I have no problem with anyone taking a different view.
I do grit my teeth, just a little, when people are challenged to "defend to indefensible". That says "I have no respect for your views".
To take one example from yesterday, after that very disappointing result:
"How can any of you defend a performance like that today, this team was put out by Mac ......"

Well who would? , it was dire, but why expect anyone to scrape up many positives? We reflect what can happen in sport and last week surely tells us not to take for granted or come to that, sack manager, board, etc

In short try not to get so ... angry... even though you care.
M

[DMU Blue]

im fairly positive about us in general so am probably classed as a member of the RTB but im pretty reasonable. we were poor yesterday, no hiding that, the players put out by roy should have beaten basingstoke. we didnt. but i dont see the need to harp on about it. Id rather just forget about it and hope our form picks up. which i believe it will

[Wooden Spoon]

malcolmr13, on Nov 12 2006, 01:45 PM, said:

I have no problem with anyone taking a different view.
I do grit my teeth, just a little, when people are challenged to "defend to indefensible". That says "I have no respect for your views".

i see.

how about the CFSS giving up on fundraising,without bothering to consult members? or turning funding down? ignoring offers of fundraising help?

what message does that send out to the fans? stuff you lot? "we have no respect for you, we just want your money while we sit on our hands"?

that is totally and utterly indefensible.

and whats next? blame the clubs woes this season on stay away fans? is thereany wonder fans are staying away? you would have to be blind not to see the ineptitude shown by those at the big table

still, they can always blame the fans, like hubbards "gamble" on clingan statement last year.

This post has been edited by death: 12 November 2006 - 07:08 PM

[malcolmr13]

death, on Nov 12 2006, 07:05 PM, said:

i see.

how about the CFSS giving up on fundraising,without bothering to consult members? or turning funding down? ignoring offers of fundraising help?

what message does that send out to the fans? stuff you lot? "we have no respect for you, we just want your money while we sit on our hands"?

that is totally and utterly indefensible.

and whats next? blame the clubs woes this season on stay away fans? is thereany wonder fans are staying away? you would have to be blind not to see the ineptitude shown by those at the big table

still, they can always blame the fans, like hubbards "gamble" on clingan statement last year.

My point about defensible/undefensible was about the style of the debate, not about the view expressed.
As far as CFSS is concerned I will exercise my vote.
I have not noted many minds being changed on the issue of ownership via the message board debate, so I will trust the democratic process. When we get the chance.

[h again]

death, on Nov 12 2006, 07:05 PM, said:

i see.

how about the CFSS giving up on fundraising,without bothering to consult members? or turning funding down? ignoring offers of fundraising help?

what message does that send out to the fans? stuff you lot? "we have no respect for you, we just want your money while we sit on our hands"?

that is totally and utterly indefensible.

and whats next? blame the clubs woes this season on stay away fans? is thereany wonder fans are staying away? you would have to be blind not to see the ineptitude shown by those at the big table

still, they can always blame the fans, like hubbards "gamble" on clingan statement last year.

Rewriting history by distortion again? To put the record straight, Mr. Hubbard said that he did not propose to gamble the club's scarce resources at a time when a play-off position and lots of goals had produced absolutely no increase in gates. In that he was absolutely correct, despite the frothing of a few fools who would have had us go into disastrous debt levels in the hope of a few more points.
As for the rest of the post you know the answer, even if you don't like it - if you can do any better, get on with it.

[carl1969]

cant believe what i read on here H i hope you dont really believe what you put on here

[Wooden Spoon]

h again, on Nov 14 2006, 10:48 AM, said:

- if you can do any better, get on with it.

im taking a breather H

[h again]

carl1969, on Nov 14 2006, 03:32 PM, said:

cant believe what i read on here H i hope you dont really believe what you put on here

Would you care to enlarge on that statement?

[carl1969]

yes i would

i love the club to lose cant swear on hear but b****x
i love to see the club go down ditto


love to see new stadium fall through - well on personal note yes - but if its def gonna better the club then i got to accept it


is that clear enough