[warfey is a spireite]

Surely not, it was said how well his rehab was looked after well?

[azul]

calvin plummers socks, on 10 April 2023 - 12:44 PM, said:

Kabby bless him was treated awfully here in terms of his rehab. Left to his own devices and putting him back months.

Thought he returned to match action in just about the standard time for a break and dislocated ankle. I suppose he would’ve returned in record time if you were looking after his rehab.

[Snowflake McBedwetter]

dim view, on 10 April 2023 - 10:21 AM, said:

Your suggestion is clear but the reasons are, as I think you know very well, spurious and mischevious.

Kabby wasn't fit, as you know, so he wasn't ignored. The team was winning, as you know, so he persevered with Quigley. We had overspent, as you know, so there was no competition brought in for Quigley. Long ago, Cook said that strikers are judged on their goals, as you know. He's recently implied that his dream line up excludes Quigley, as you know.

So to claim that all along that he's rated Quigley is inaccurate.

And he's 'persevering' with Quigley again.

To be fair. His hands are tied with only Asante , McCallum and Dallas in the wings...

[dtp]

dim view, on 10 April 2023 - 10:21 AM, said:

Your suggestion is clear but the reasons are, as I think you know very well, spurious and mischevious.

Kabby wasn't fit, as you know, so he wasn't ignored. The team was winning, as you know, so he persevered with Quigley. We had overspent, as you know, so there was no competition brought in for Quigley. Long ago, Cook said that strikers are judged on their goals, as you know. He's recently implied that his dream line up excludes Quigley, as you know.

So to claim that all along that he's rated Quigley is inaccurate.

Any road up, can you please explain to me how today's team selection supports your thoughts in this debate?

After all, it's only fair, I've gone to great lengths in trying to get mine over only to be dismissed as being spurious and mischievous.

[calvin plummers socks]

azul, on 10 April 2023 - 01:02 PM, said:

Thought he returned to match action in just about the standard time for a break and dislocated ankle. I suppose he would’ve returned in record time if you were looking after his rehab.

I’ll bow down to your experience then - my apologies

[jack bauer]

so we win today against a side who beat us earlier in the season, the equivalent of this thread should be someone posting that cook should now be given a 10 year contract extension, this would of course be ridicolous and a total over reaction to one game in just the same way that calling for him to sacked after friday's defeat was also ridiculous.

[calvin plummers socks]

warfey is a spireite, on 10 April 2023 - 12:53 PM, said:

Surely not, it was said how well his rehab was looked after well?

He was at 2 different clubs doing his rehab.
After he posted the stupidity of his exercises on his socials.
Hence his not being happy at the medical failure at Brum.

[Surrey Spireite]

Nurse, Walton has wandered out of his room again ...

As soon as I saw the title of this thread, I didn't even need to guess who started it.

[s42blue]

Walton Spireite, on 07 April 2023 - 04:07 PM, said:

That result today isnt bad it is disaster. Season over. Unforgiveable.

Any comment today? I imagine you weren’t there?

[Walton Spireite]

s42blue, on 10 April 2023 - 04:40 PM, said:

Any comment today? I imagine you weren’t there?

No. I haven't got Fridays debacle out of my system. Terrible result that.

[dim view]

dtp, on 10 April 2023 - 01:25 PM, said:

Any road up, can you please explain to me how today's team selection supports your thoughts in this debate?

After all, it's only fair, I've gone to great lengths in trying to get mine over only to be dismissed as being spurious and mischievous.

Sure, on team selection. I've just got in and I'm delighted, after missing the streaming and 1866.

I'm not aware yet of how we set up or performed, but I predicted a change in balance with a 3rd midfielder coming in, and I myself would have started Quigley ahead of the limited alternatives, Dallas or Asante, against this particular opposition. So my thoughts in this debate are that nowt about your historical views has changed.

I'll leave it to others to decide whether Quigley's performance today has resulted in Cooky 'really rating' him.

[azul]

Walton Spireite, on 10 April 2023 - 04:51 PM, said:

No. I haven't got Fridays debacle out of my system. Terrible result that.

Why no new thread expressing your continued disappointment?

[Walton Spireite]

azul, on 10 April 2023 - 05:32 PM, said:

Why no new thread expressing your continued disappointment?

If i put a new thread the happy clappers start crying 🤣🤣

[azul]

Walton Spireite, on 10 April 2023 - 05:35 PM, said:

If i put a new thread the happy clappers start crying 🤣🤣

Don’t be shy, never stopped you before

[spireitetoo]

Quaker, on 10 April 2023 - 06:45 PM, said:

Says who? Come on back it up with some facts or once again go all quiet and not answer any questions.

You really expect an answer.. ?

Good luck

This post has been edited by spireitetoo: 10 April 2023 - 07:06 PM

[dtp]

dim view, on 10 April 2023 - 04:54 PM, said:

Sure, on team selection. I've just got in and I'm delighted, after missing the streaming and 1866.

I'm not aware yet of how we set up or performed, but I predicted a change in balance with a 3rd midfielder coming in, and I myself would have started Quigley ahead of the limited alternatives, Dallas or Asante, against this particular opposition. So my thoughts in this debate are that nowt about your historical views has changed.

I'll leave it to others to decide whether Quigley's performance today has resulted in Cooky 'really rating' him.

Sounds very much that you are cleverly trying to wriggle off the hook to me.

[azul]

calvin plummers socks, on 10 April 2023 - 04:01 PM, said:

I’ll bow down to your experience then - my apologies

Thanks, a for a bit of humility at last

Harvey Elliot’s recovery was hailed as miraculous, whereas Wesley Fofana had complications. Tshimanga recovery was somewhere in between.

Some research would enhance your chosen career beyond postulating on a football message board.

But I will accept your apologies this time

[warfey is a spireite]

azul, on 10 April 2023 - 07:25 PM, said:

Thanks, a for a bit of humility at last

Harvey Elliot’s recovery was hailed as miraculous, whereas Wesley Fofana had complications. Tshimanga recovery was somewhere in between.

Some research would enhance your chosen career beyond postulating on a football message board.

But I will accept your apologies this time

But his hamstring was ok ?

[calvin plummers socks]

azul, on 10 April 2023 - 07:25 PM, said:

Thanks, a for a bit of humility at last

Harvey Elliot’s recovery was hailed as miraculous, whereas Wesley Fofana had complications. Tshimanga recovery was somewhere in between.

Some research would enhance your chosen career beyond postulating on a football message board.

But I will accept your apologies this time

What’s your job Azul? You seem to know a lot about everything. Im thinking Uni Principal or CEO of a big conglomerate?

warfey is a spireite, on 10 April 2023 - 07:29 PM, said:

But his hamstring was ok ?

Warfey here resorting to type
- “this’ll get a laugh from everyone - I’ll type hamstrings or say something that is vaguely risqué in a mildly homosexual way a la Dick Emery….”