[calvin plummers socks]

 Mr Mercury, on 05 September 2024 - 06:46 PM, said:

I see when our Europhile lawyer visited Germany recently he discussed smashing the gangs and working together to control mass immigration.
It would seem that Scholz didn?t tell him about Germanys plan to use the Rwanda facilities that the previous government agreed and built with the Rwandan government, the same plan and facilities that Starmer ditched on day one of his dictatorship..sorry government..without having the decency to tell Rwanda.
Mind you you cant blame Schulz, he obviously didn?t want to embarrass our glorious leader..bit of a North Korea reference there in case anyone missed it..probably thinking the poor chap has been under the cosh a bit recently and wanted to give him a break.
As I said before it?s like shooting fish in a barrel with this clown in charge.

Are you ok??

[PontePete]

 calvin plummers socks, on 05 September 2024 - 06:49 PM, said:

Are you ok??

How?s Zurich?

[calvin plummers socks]

 PontePete, on 05 September 2024 - 08:16 PM, said:

How?s Zurich?

Very wet!!

[PontePete]

 calvin plummers socks, on 05 September 2024 - 09:25 PM, said:

Very wet!!

So was London today. Everywhere in uk looking okay tomorrow and Saturday though ☀️

[Search & Destroy]

https://amp.dw.com/e...ions/a-70138163

https://www.dailymai...ir-Starmer.html

https://www.express....urs-migrant/amp

[Westbars Spireite]

9 years for a particularly stupid South Yorkshireman. No mention of whether he shouted at a police dog.

[calvin plummers socks]

 Westbars Spireite, on 06 September 2024 - 12:34 PM, said:

9 years for a particularly stupid South Yorkshireman. No mention of whether he shouted at a police dog.

Awaits Mercury popping up defending him and something about 2 tier Starmer.
I dunno - you can?t attack a police line, set fire to a hotel and racially abuse anyone nowadays - it?s PC and wokeness gone mad

[Painted Wagon]

 Westbars Spireite, on 06 September 2024 - 12:34 PM, said:

9 years for a particularly stupid South Yorkshireman. No mention of whether he shouted at a police dog.

Arson with intent to endanger life carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

[Mr Mercury]

 Westbars Spireite, on 06 September 2024 - 12:34 PM, said:

9 years for a particularly stupid South Yorkshireman. No mention of whether he shouted at a police dog.

Well deserved.

[azul]

 Westbars Spireite, on 06 September 2024 - 12:34 PM, said:

9 years for a particularly stupid South Yorkshireman. No mention of whether he shouted at a police dog.

There was more than one attempting to set fire to the Rotherham hotel with people in it. Hopefully more will get charged with Arson. Probably goes for that one in Tamworth as well

[azul]

 Painted Wagon, on 06 September 2024 - 02:02 PM, said:

Arson with intent to endanger life carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

I think he can count himself lucky he only got nine years

[s42blue]

 Goku, on 05 September 2024 - 01:11 PM, said:

Funny how when a benefit is removed from pensioners you're up in arms but you didn't utter a single word on this board about the Tories cutting... well, everything they've cut over the last 14 years. Chris explained it beautifully; completely transparent hypocrisy.

This always makes me chuckle. A poster can only make a valid point if on every occasion in the last 14 years they criticised every decision a Labour supporter criticised; whilst at the same time applauding an opposition for everything they agree with too.

Hahaha. And transparent hypocrisy.. all the staunch supporters must agree with everything then SKS has done.

They?re as bad as each other over time.

[Goku]

 s42blue, on 06 September 2024 - 06:01 PM, said:

This always makes me chuckle. A poster can only make a valid point if on every occasion in the last 14 years they criticised every decision a Labour supporter criticised; whilst at the same time applauding an opposition for everything they agree with too.

Nope, just literally one comment criticising the Government of the past 14 years would do. Literally a single one. Obviously, when a semi-frequent poster refuses to critique a Governement in power for such a length of time (who were hilariously awful) but is willing to go in both barrels in the first couple of months of a new regime with OTT dramatic pearl-clutching, it says a lot about how biased they are. Surprised he didn?t go balls deep and call Starmer a communist. Obviously we all are biased to an extent (despite one or two who claim otherwise) but I won?t take somebody seriously who can?t and won?t criticise their own side. That?s a totally fair viewpoint to hold imo, you may disagree in which case fair enough.

This post has been edited by Goku: 06 September 2024 - 06:36 PM

[isleaiw1]

 Goku, on 06 September 2024 - 06:34 PM, said:

Nope, just literally one comment criticising the Government of the past 14 years would do. Literally a single one. Obviously, when a semi-frequent poster refuses to critique a Governement in power for such a length of time (who were hilariously awful) but is willing to go in both barrels in the first couple of months of a new regime with OTT dramatic pearl-clutching, it says a lot about how biased they are. Surprised he didn?t go balls deep and call Starmer a communist. Obviously we all are biased to an extent (despite one or two who claim otherwise) but I won?t take somebody seriously who can?t and won?t criticise their own side. That?s a totally fair viewpoint to hold imo, you may disagree in which case fair enough.

Some of the bias is of course just to counter the blinkered Labour is wonderful views spouted on here...

I'm looking forward to the balanced response after Oct 30th, and wondering how many will say its all the Tories fault and not choices made by Labour. My guess is most....

[Mr Mercury]

 Goku, on 06 September 2024 - 06:34 PM, said:

Nope, just literally one comment criticising the Government of the past 14 years would do. Literally a single one. Obviously, when a semi-frequent poster refuses to critique a Governement in power for such a length of time (who were hilariously awful) but is willing to go in both barrels in the first couple of months of a new regime with OTT dramatic pearl-clutching, it says a lot about how biased they are. Surprised he didn?t go balls deep and call Starmer a communist. Obviously we all are biased to an extent (despite one or two who claim otherwise) but I won?t take somebody seriously who can?t and won?t criticise their own side. That?s a totally fair viewpoint to hold imo, you may disagree in which case fair enough.

Do you mean me?

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 06 September 2024 - 06:58 PM

[Valley Blues]

 Goku, on 06 September 2024 - 06:34 PM, said:

Nope, just literally one comment criticising the Government of the past 14 years would do. Literally a single one. Obviously, when a semi-frequent poster refuses to critique a Governement in power for such a length of time (who were hilariously awful) but is willing to go in both barrels in the first couple of months of a new regime with OTT dramatic pearl-clutching, it says a lot about how biased they are. Surprised he didn?t go balls deep and call Starmer a communist. Obviously we all are biased to an extent (despite one or two who claim otherwise) but I won?t take somebody seriously who can?t and won?t criticise their own side. That?s a totally fair viewpoint to hold imo, you may disagree in which case fair enough.

I
Are you saying there are a couple of staunch Labour supporters on here that you also won?t take seriously?
They certainly also meet your criteria for not taking seriously.

[Search & Destroy]

Poland, I must admit it was very clean and safe when we visited

[Search & Destroy]

Germany close borders

https://www.aljazeer...ll-land-borders

[isleaiw1]

 Search & Destroy, on 10 September 2024 - 07:01 AM, said:

Germany close borders

https://www.aljazeer...ll-land-borders

Isnt that against EU policy and therefore they will be sanctioned for it?

[azul]

 isleaiw1, on 10 September 2024 - 09:06 PM, said:

Isnt that against EU policy and therefore they will be sanctioned for it?

My advice is read the article - the answer may live within.