[Looker-on]

Thankfully, under section 14 of the Freedom of Information Act, a public authority may decline to comply with a FOI request if they consider it to be vexatious. It may of course be possible for "Old Goat" to make a FOI request of his own, to see what Bean has been saying about him.

This post has been edited by Looker-on: 07 October 2019 - 07:55 PM

[Jud]

We've all got our limits and most have had theirs surpassed way before now, but this? This goes beyond the incompetence/dross we've had to put up with and crosses over into vindictiveness. How the **** does he even have time for such pointless meddling? I barely go these days anyway but this cements my position. Supporting a badly run laughing stock of a club is one thing, but one that attempts to make problems for the few fans it has left? Whistle.

[CFC91]

I’d wavered a little and was considering going to the Notts County game for the first time since March with it being a local derby, probably a decent atmosphere but Bean the rest of them can ram it. I’ll be back when they’re gone, end of.

As a man who’s painted himself as the go to person and someone keen to repair relations with the fans he has a funny way of going about it the little weasel. How low can you sink? Attempting to ruin someone’s life/career of a little complaint over email about buying tickets online.

Freak

[Mr Mercury]

Absolutely appalling, if the communication was done in a civilised manner, and I must say oldtimer always seems to post in that way whether you agree with him or not, then to try to cause him what could have been serious problems with his employer is disgusting. I hope he pursues issues at the club with equal vigour. I'm just shaking my head in disbelief.

[Sammy Spireite]

Are you certain it’s bean or just someone using his email address?

Was it suggested a while ago, that a certain IT “expert” at the club was reading & replying to emails not necessarily addressed to him?

Unless, of course, it’s the Scunthorpe hacker again? Didn’t he compromise Carson’s government access using his Assay office email address to hack his twitter account?

[Les Ashmore]

oldgoat, on 07 October 2019 - 06:30 PM, said:

<br />Evening folks ,<br /><br />I had e mailed Graham Bean regarding a couple of matters this year , firstly about the banning orders after boxing day perhaps causing problems for those wanting to go to blood donor sessions and more recently regarding issues buying concessionary tickets online , the discussion about the issues buying tickets ended with Mr Bean sending a reply which was not to be shared with anyone - I didn't -  I just put on Bobs board that Mr Bean had replied but I couldn't share it .<br />He also commented that he felt I shouldn't be using a " public service " e mail address , after which I contacted him using my personal e mail address not my work one .<br />However a couple of weeks ago my employer said they had been contacted by Mr Bean complaining about me using my work e mail address and wanting to know if I had communicated with anyone else about him , I contacted Mr Bean and he told me it was a FOI request but would tell me no more , he suggested I ask my employer .<br />My employer has seen all the e mail communication I had concerning Mr Bean and find I have done nothing wrong however they suggest I use my personal e mail account when communicating with Mr Bean , which I had already done after his comments regarding " public service " e mails .<br />I was reluctant to air this issue on Bobs board but after repeated requests asking Mr Bean what he was trying to achieve by this action and receiving no reply I felt I was left with little option other than to nudge Mr Bean into answering my question - what was he trying to achieve by this action because it was not a pleasant experience .<br />

Have you made a FOI request to his employers requesting the same?

This post has been edited by Les Ashmore: 07 October 2019 - 08:02 PM

[Mr Mercury]

CFC91, on 07 October 2019 - 07:56 PM, said:

I’d wavered a little and was considering going to the Notts County game for the first time since March with it being a local derby, probably a decent atmosphere but Bean the rest of them can ram it. I’ll be back when they’re gone, end of.

As a man who’s painted himself as the go to person and someone keen to repair relations with the fans he has a funny way of going about it the little weasel. How low can you sink? Attempting to ruin someone’s life/career of a little complaint over email about buying tickets online.

Freak

You're completely right, I'm staggered what he tried to do to the bloke via his employer for what appears to be genuine concerns. Roll on the AGM.

[SpireiteFitzy]

Isn't this the same Graham Bean who always says that his door is open to communication with the fans? Now he's dobbing them in to their employers over an email address.

Stuff like this really makes me angry. How anyone at this club has the nerve to go after fans about what they perceive to be unprofessional conduct when they themselves are the most inept and unprofessional group ever is beyond belief. This club is the very symbol of unprofessional and when a fan is making genuine inquiries about genuine issues in a professional way to then go after them with the most infantile of complaints shows a complete lack of class to match said levels of professionalism. The fact any fans care enough anymore to be dealing with the club should for them represent a minor miracle and they should be doing all they can to show these fans that they are capable of sensible discussion and respect towards their customer base.

It's just a shame fans don't have the same ability to contact an authority figure at the club when it comes to highlighting the plethora of scandals, errors and mismanagement and holding those people responsible to account. I mean those things are actual issues that an employer should be very worried about.

[azul]

He should share his confidential conversation if there was anything worthwhile.

[moondog]

Les Ashmore, on 07 October 2019 - 07:58 PM, said:

Have you made a FOI request to his employers requesting the same?

The club isn't a public body so isn't covered.

[Jack Lester's Cast]

oldgoat, on 07 October 2019 - 06:30 PM, said:

Evening folks ,

I had e mailed Graham Bean regarding a couple of matters this year , firstly about the banning orders after boxing day perhaps causing problems for those wanting to go to blood donor sessions and more recently regarding issues buying concessionary tickets online , the discussion about the issues buying tickets ended with Mr Bean sending a reply which was not to be shared with anyone - I didn't - I just put on Bobs board that Mr Bean had replied but I couldn't share it .
He also commented that he felt I shouldn't be using a " public service " e mail address , after which I contacted him using my personal e mail address not my work one .
However a couple of weeks ago my employer said they had been contacted by Mr Bean complaining about me using my work e mail address and wanting to know if I had communicated with anyone else about him , I contacted Mr Bean and he told me it was a FOI request but would tell me no more , he suggested I ask my employer .
My employer has seen all the e mail communication I had concerning Mr Bean and find I have done nothing wrong however they suggest I use my personal e mail account when communicating with Mr Bean , which I had already done after his comments regarding " public service " e mails .
I was reluctant to air this issue on Bobs board but after repeated requests asking Mr Bean what he was trying to achieve by this action and receiving no reply I felt I was left with little option other than to nudge Mr Bean into answering my question - what was he trying to achieve by this action because it was not a pleasant experience .

I have read on here a few times that he is willing to answer questions and he is straight to the point, yet people forget he worked for the police. I cannot believe some on here are still cosying up to snakes like this. Is it for the freebies? Is it for the 'intel?' or just to be seen?

It reminds of the move Steve Coercive tried to pull last year with his boyfriend Carson, threatening me with the defamation act.

His face along with SC, DA, AC are now on my dart board, the pr!cks!

This post has been edited by Jack Lester's Cast: 07 October 2019 - 08:26 PM

[SpireiteFitzy]

Sammy Spireite, on 07 October 2019 - 07:57 PM, said:

Are you certain it’s bean or just someone using his email address?

Was it suggested a while ago, that a certain IT “expert” at the club was reading & replying to emails not necessarily addressed to him?

Unless, of course, it’s the Scunthorpe hacker again? Didn’t he compromise Carson’s government access using his Assay office email address to hack his twitter account?

Well Graham Bean is really backed into a corner then isn't he. He (or whoever is using it) is going after someone for using a work e-mail address and calling it unprofessional whilst at the same time he's letting someone else use his own work e-mail address? Surely that's even more unprofessional. Someone could be having sensitive conversations with whom they believe is the CFC CEO when it's actually someone else instead? That would certainly warrant a justified complaint to his employer.

This post has been edited by SpireiteFitzy: 07 October 2019 - 08:13 PM

[Mr Mercury]

SpireiteFitzy, on 07 October 2019 - 08:08 PM, said:

Well Graham Bean is really backed into a corner then isn't he. He's going after someone for using a work e-mail address and calling it unprofessional whilst at the same time he's letting someone else use his own work e-mail address? Surely that's even more unprofessional. Someone could be having sensitive conversations with whom they believe is the CFC CEO when it's actually someone else instead? That would certainly warrant a justified complaint to his employer.

Reading the original post again it seems that GB is well aware of the communications and it implies it is him who pursued the matter. .NB,Please don't sue me or send the boys round if I've misread the original post because I'm sure the screen shotter is foaming at the mouth in delight tonight. He must be like a kid on Christmas Eve....how do they look themselves in the mirror behaving like they do with how far the club has fallen?

[moondog]

SpireiteFitzy, on 07 October 2019 - 08:08 PM, said:

Well Graham Bean is really backed into a corner then isn't he. He (or whoever is using it) is going after someone for using a work e-mail address and calling it unprofessional whilst at the same time he's letting someone else use his own work e-mail address? Surely that's even more unprofessional. Someone could be having sensitive conversations with whom they believe is the CFC CEO when it's actually someone else instead? That would certainly warrant a justified complaint to his employer.

I think as Mr Bean has admitted to Old Goat he wrote to his employer this won't be the case.

Also if he did make a personal subject access request as claimed he would have had to provide ID

[Cactoise]

Has been tried blaming The Scunthorpe Hacker?

[Les Ashmore]

Sammy Spireite, on 07 October 2019 - 07:57 PM, said:

<br />Are you certain it's bean or just someone using his email address? <br /><br />Was it suggested a while ago, that a certain IT "expert" at the club was reading &amp; replying to emails not necessarily addressed to him? <br /><br />Unless, of course, it's the Scunthorpe hacker again? Didn't he compromise Carson's government access using his Assay office email address to hack his twitter account?<br />

I must admit what I found extremely strange about that was that as far as I am aware no police report was made which as it was probably a government access would have been paramount.
When I was accused of a transgression which I knew I had not commited I immediately contacted the Police Cyber Crime unit who confirmed my suspicions

[Mr Mercury]

Maybe try asking the 600 non attending season ticket holders why they no longer attend. I'm sure their details are available?

[Westbars Spireite]

I was told a good while ago that my own identity and employer had been sought in a similar fashion by the 'club'. Presumably for the same scare tactic reasons. I wasn't the only one either.

[Mr Mercury]

Westbars Spireite, on 07 October 2019 - 08:27 PM, said:

I was told a good while ago that my own identity and employer had been sought in a similar fashion by the 'club'. Presumably for the same scare tactic reasons. I wasn't the only one either.

Ah the wailing wall! Touché

[azul]

Sammy Spireite, on 07 October 2019 - 07:57 PM, said:

Are you certain it’s bean or just someone using his email address?

Was it suggested a while ago, that a certain IT “expert” at the club was reading & replying to emails not necessarily addressed to him?

Unless, of course, it’s the Scunthorpe hacker again? Didn’t he compromise Carson’s government access using his Assay office email address to hack his twitter account?

That sounds like complete bollux

Let’s face Beano is an employee doing his master bidding and he seems to be enjoying it far too much