[Stoptalkingbol]

‘Wrong-kit’ is classic. It’s up there with cunthead.

[danblue]

Stoptalkingbol, on 18 May 2018 - 03:07 PM, said:

‘Wrong-kit’ is classic. It’s up there with cunthead.

Was just thinking that would be a great nic name for him
Wrong-kit! Give us a wave!
Wrong- kit Wrong- kit, give us a wave!
Haha

[Misnomer]

Our owners a tight deedah
His sidekick's a cünt
His son's a moron who loves an illegal punt
Now the greedy fückers have sent us down
The laundry boys are in town....

Nah nah nah

Top o' me 'ed...

[Wooden Spoon]

Stoptalkingbol said:

1526656054[/url]' post='1393628']
'Wrong-kit' is classic.

Brilliant int it

[DIFH]

Search and Destroy, on 17 May 2018 - 09:09 PM, said:

Let's wait until we see if there are any charges then shall we

Maybe the FA are waiting for the England games to be completed at The Proact.

[Spire-Heights]

DIFH, on 18 May 2018 - 07:41 PM, said:

Maybe the FA are waiting for the England games to be completed at The Proact.

The games are finished at the Proact!

[Andy Spireite]

Is it realistic to think that Carson could get a ban from all football related activities due to his obvious association with his son and the very probable assumption that he was fed information?

It would be a fantastic outcome if so.

[Search & Destroy]

Andy Spireite, on 18 May 2018 - 08:47 PM, said:

Is it realistic to think that Carson could get a ban from all football related activities due to his obvious association with his son and the very probable assumption that he was fed information?

It would be a fantastic outcome if so.

A ban for a probable assumption seems a tad unlikely

[Super steve cammack]

I am sick of reading about that moron carson. No other club in the football league would have him around. But us we just let him carry on systematically destroying our club while the pigeon man spouts his usual bile blamin everyone but himself. Christ whens it all gonna end. I just wish i had somethin positive to post about.

[Andy Spireite]

Search and Destroy, on 18 May 2018 - 09:06 PM, said:

A ban for a probable assumption seems a tad unlikely

Yes I tend to agree but I’m not familiar with the rules and punishments around insider betting within football which do seem to be quite strict.

[Wooden Spoon]

Andy Spireite said:

1526676456[/url]' post='1393711']
Is it realistic to think that Carson could get a ban from all football related activities due to his obvious association with his son and the very probable assumption that he was fed information?

It would be a fantastic outcome if so.

http://www.thefa.com...g/betting-rules

http://www.thefa.com...es-2015-16.ashx

A Participant shall not bet, either directly or indirectly, or instruct, permit, cause or enable any person to bet on -
(i) the result, progress, conduct or any other aspect of, or

(ii) any other matter concerning or related to football anywhere in the world, including, for example and without limitation, the transfer of players, employment of managers, team selection or

(a) The terms ‘football match’ and ‘competition’ as used in sub-paragraph E8(1)(a)(i) include any Match or Competition (as appropriate) as de ned in Rule A2, and also include any other football match or competition not within those de nitions in Rule A2, including but not limited to any football match or competition sanctioned by UEFA, or FIFA, or by any other association, federation or governing body.

(b) Where a Participant provides to any other person any information relating to football which the Participant has obtained by virtue of his or her position within the game and which is not publicly available at that time, the Participant shall be in breach of this Rule where any of that information is used by that other person for, or in relation to, betting.


© It shall be a defence to a charge brought pursuant to sub-paragraph E8(1)(b) if a Participant can establish, on the balance of probability, that the Participant provided any such information in circumstances where he did not know, and could not reasonably have known, that the information provided would be used by the other person for or in relation to betting.

A Participant shall not bet, either directly or indirectly, or instruct, permit, cause or enable any person to bet on –

(i) the result, progress, conduct or any other aspect of, or occurrence in, a football match or competition:
(B) in which the Participant has any in uence, either direct or indirect; or

(ii) any other matter concerning or related to any Club participating in any league Competition, as de ned in Rule A2, that the Participant is participating in or has participated in during that season, including, for example and without limitation, the transfer of players, employment of managers, team selection or disciplinary matters.f
The terms ‘football match’ and ‘competition’ as used in sub-paragraph E8(1)(a)(i) include any Match or Competition (as appropriate) as de ned in Rule A2, and also include any other football match or competition not within those de nitions in Rule A2, including but not limited to any football match or competition sanctioned by UEFA, or FIFA, or by any other association, federation or governing body.

(b) Where a Participant provides to any other person any information relating to football which the Participant has obtained by virtue of his or her position within the game and which is not publicly available at that time, the Participant shall be in breach of this Rule where any of that information is used by that other person for, or in relation to, betting.

© It shall be a defence to a charge brought pursuant to sub-paragraph E8(1)(b) if a Participant can establish, on the balance of probability, that the Participant provided any such information in circumstances where he did not know, and could not reasonably have known, that the information provided would be used by the other person for or in relation to betting.
(2) (a). A Participant shall not bet, either directly or indirectly, or instruct, permit, cause or enable any person to bet on –
(i) the result, progress, conduct or any other aspect of, or occurrence in, a football match or competition:
(B) in which the Participant has any in uence, either direct or indirect; or

(ii) any other matter concerning or related to any Club participating in any league Competition, as de ned in Rule A2, that the Participant is participating in or has participated in during that season, including, for example and without limitation, the transfer of players, employment of managers, team selection or disciplinary matters.

[DIFH]

Super steve cammack, on 18 May 2018 - 09:11 PM, said:

I am sick of reading about that moron carson. No other club in the football league would have him around. But us we just let him carry on systematically destroying our club while the pigeon man spouts his usual bile blamin everyone but himself. Christ whens it all gonna end. I just wish i had somethin positive to post about.

we could always with hold ST monies until he goes.

[Siberian Spireite]

DIFH, on 19 May 2018 - 01:21 PM, said:

we could always with hold ST monies until he goes.

Not a bad idea- people could sign a list pledging to buy an ST once Carson has left.

[stokey]

danblue, on 18 May 2018 - 03:24 PM, said:

Was just thinking that would be a great nic name for him
Wrong-kit! Give us a wave!
Wrong- kit Wrong- kit, give us a wave!
Haha

Brilliant. That and Dave Trump could really stick :-D

[Blue5]

newbold ken, on 17 May 2018 - 03:44 PM, said:

Correct , as an ex betting shop manager I can confirm the most my firm would take was £20 and even then I'd have to warn other shops around us .

How does it work with the crime gangs involved in betting and the influencing of results and incidents within a game? Does it all take place offshore?

[newbold ken]

Blue5, on 19 May 2018 - 03:58 PM, said:

How does it work with the crime gangs involved in betting and the influencing of results and incidents within a game? Does it all take place offshore?

Would say so , didn't really come across bets like that offered across the counter

[Wooden Spoon]

Search and Destroy said:

1526677602[/url]' post='1393718']
A ban for a probable assumption seems a tad unlikely

Does it though?

Is it probable that Carson, in breach of FA rules, allowed his son to be in possession, either verbal or written, who the next manager was?

If it’s probable then he’s in contravention.

[warfey is a spireite]

I don’t like mondays, on 20 May 2018 - 08:13 PM, said:

Does it though?

Is it probable that Carson, in breach of FA rules, allowed his son to be in possession, either verbal or written, who the next manager was?
Any fine will come out this month's 200k Allan allegedly puts in
If it’s probable then he’s in contravention.

[Blue5]

Has Jordan or Ashley been charged?