Agm
#81
Posted 06 February 2017 - 10:23 PM
#82
Posted 06 February 2017 - 10:36 PM
#83
Posted 06 February 2017 - 10:37 PM
MDCCCLXVI, on 06 February 2017 - 10:36 PM, said:
Is Mr Biggs a shareholder?
#84
Posted 06 February 2017 - 10:37 PM
MDCCCLXVI, on 06 February 2017 - 10:36 PM, said:
Already made his public apology regarding the Sutcliffe interview.
#85
Posted 06 February 2017 - 10:41 PM
spireitenag, on 06 February 2017 - 10:37 PM, said:
So the big question is what next ?
#86
Posted 06 February 2017 - 10:42 PM
spireitenag, on 06 February 2017 - 10:37 PM, said:
Really, where?
#89
Posted 06 February 2017 - 10:46 PM
I would also like to give my thanks to the members of this board and ex staff who have stuck with this to get a positive outcome, but as Freelander2 has pointed out, there are other issues that need addressing
#93
Posted 06 February 2017 - 11:00 PM
Fans have been responsible for incredibly dogged and diligent work to unearth the truth about that operation. Their work has been vindicated
I also hope any who were critical of DT investigation and series of articles on Sutcliffe's operation will now concede it was all true.
As I told Sutcliffe himself in a December phone call, all we are interested in is the truth. I hope I get a chance to let him tell it.
Above is from Graham Smyth twitter account (Derbyshire Times Reporter).
#94
Posted 06 February 2017 - 11:01 PM
Freddie, on 06 February 2017 - 10:47 PM, said:
There were no checks on the door as to who was in attendance.
However, you could go along and represent a shareholder by proxy, without being one yourself.
As a side, Dave Allen agreeing to being the seconder on signing off last years accounts on the night got a few laughs!
#95
Posted 06 February 2017 - 11:04 PM
Spire-Heights, on 06 February 2017 - 11:00 PM, said:
Fans have been responsible for incredibly dogged and diligent work to unearth the truth about that operation. Their work has been vindicated
I also hope any who were critical of DT investigation and series of articles on Sutcliffe's operation will now concede it was all true.
As I told Sutcliffe himself in a December phone call, all we are interested in is the truth. I hope I get a chance to let him tell it.
Above is from Graham Smyth twitter account (Derbyshire Times Reporter).
I don't think LS would know the truth if it grabbed him by the balls.
Completely deluded egocentric.
#96
Posted 06 February 2017 - 11:35 PM
#97
Posted 07 February 2017 - 08:21 AM
Namely why are we supposedly losing £1.5m a year and why are our non playing wages are double the size of clubs of equivalent size? As that's where the main chunk of the money appears to be being spent...
......the question is on who????
This post has been edited by Middle East: 07 February 2017 - 08:24 AM
#99
Posted 07 February 2017 - 08:29 AM
Middle East, on 07 February 2017 - 08:21 AM, said:
Namely why are we supposedly losing £1.5m a year and why are our non playing wages are double the size of clubs of equivalent size? As that's where the main chunk of the money appears to be being spent...
......the question is on who????
4000 extra supporters per match wouldn't see us breaking even at those losses. Shambolic mismanagement.
This post has been edited by Skywalker: 07 February 2017 - 08:29 AM
#100
Posted 07 February 2017 - 09:04 AM
Skywalker, on 07 February 2017 - 08:29 AM, said:
That's an understatement! The only laugh I had reading through this was Mike Warners statement apparently saying DA has no involvement or influence anymore....
