Charlie Raglan
#1
Posted 29 December 2016 - 10:52 AM
#2
Posted 29 December 2016 - 10:53 AM
#3
Posted 29 December 2016 - 11:09 AM
SpireiteJN, on 29 December 2016 - 10:53 AM, said:
Snap their hands off.
He doesn't have a 'sell' value and he wouldn't improve our defence.
#5
Posted 29 December 2016 - 01:53 PM
SpireiteJN, on 29 December 2016 - 10:53 AM, said:
Sell him ?
Isn't ŔB a problem area that he could cover, a flexible player that is rarely injured.
dim view, on 29 December 2016 - 11:09 AM, said:
He doesn't have a 'sell' value and he wouldn't improve our defence.
Rubbish Dave! Raglan or Liddle then.
#6
Posted 29 December 2016 - 02:02 PM
Dave In Footie Heaven, on 29 December 2016 - 01:53 PM, said:
Isn't ŔB a problem area that he could cover, a flexible player that is rarely injured.
Rubbish Dave! Raglan or Liddle then.
Raglan has been absolutely awful when he's been played at RB. I'm not against him returning to offer an option at CH but most definitely not at RB.
This post has been edited by Valley Blues: 29 December 2016 - 02:04 PM
#7
Posted 29 December 2016 - 02:24 PM
spireitenag, on 29 December 2016 - 10:52 AM, said:
Either sell him or bring him back here to partner Hird. I can't understand why Wilson and Morgan let him go in the first place, we are letting in goals by the bucket full. Then again I can't understand their team selections / tactics, the football is mostly aweful to watch, no wonder the stayaways aren't rushing back.
#8
Posted 29 December 2016 - 02:28 PM
lindave, on 29 December 2016 - 02:24 PM, said:
It''s about one in one out to facilitate other positions etc. Seb situation is similar- can't see there being clubs queueing to take him on loan that's why we're being primed for his return.
This post has been edited by Dave In Footie Heaven: 29 December 2016 - 02:28 PM
#9
Posted 29 December 2016 - 07:24 PM