Scunny
#1
Posted 20 December 2016 - 03:30 PM
This follows on from £3.2 million loss the previous year.
#3
Posted 20 December 2016 - 04:22 PM
hilly81, on 20 December 2016 - 03:39 PM, said:
Short term easy long term pain. Oh The romance of rich owner with perceived ambition.
Some time down the line said fan will hope to get some or all of his money back.
Simply boom or bust economics on less revenue streams than us.
#4
Posted 20 December 2016 - 04:23 PM
#6
Posted 20 December 2016 - 04:43 PM
Spire-Heights, on 20 December 2016 - 04:23 PM, said:
More than £800K spent on the stadium contributed to the loss? Got full planning permission at the beginning of the year but can't find any other news of progress. Probably hoping get some of the £25M development costs back in EU funding

This post has been edited by azul: 20 December 2016 - 04:46 PM
#7
Posted 20 December 2016 - 04:48 PM
freelander2, on 20 December 2016 - 04:28 PM, said:
I'm looking forward to the AGM.
Yes, we can expect to hear him bring this up as an example of how not to run a football club
#8
Posted 20 December 2016 - 04:56 PM
azul, on 20 December 2016 - 04:48 PM, said:
I don't know, apparently petty cash has been dropped to practically nothing at scunny....lol
#9
Posted 20 December 2016 - 06:47 PM
#13
Posted 20 December 2016 - 09:37 PM
Armageddon, on 20 December 2016 - 04:22 PM, said:
Some time down the line said fan will hope to get some or all of his money back.
Simply boom or bust economics on less revenue streams than us.
He won't get his money back as easily as Allen, Swann's tends to put his cash into shares, as otherwise the club would be breaching salary cap rules.
#14
Posted 20 December 2016 - 10:05 PM
#16
Posted 20 December 2016 - 11:24 PM
Spire-Heights, on 20 December 2016 - 04:23 PM, said:
Father in law is from Scunthorpe he told me there is some problem with roads / traffic / access that is holding things up
#17
Posted 21 December 2016 - 12:48 PM
freelander2, on 20 December 2016 - 07:33 PM, said:
I wonder how they are presenting their figures.
We stated £1.9M but that is only basic, then add £2.4M when bonuses are added, but it is actually £2.9M once NI has been added
Hopefully their £2.5M is basic, otherwise we aren't getting great value compared to them
#18
Posted 21 December 2016 - 02:05 PM
azul, on 21 December 2016 - 12:48 PM, said:
We stated £1.9M but that is only basic, then add £2.4M when bonuses are added, but it is actually £2.9M once NI has been added
Hopefully their £2.5M is basic, otherwise we aren't getting great value compared to them
That was last season wasn't it?
I think we can call that a fact, and the subject of many a post on here. And we still we pay for Ebanks Blake.
#20
Posted 23 December 2016 - 01:11 PM
Bluekent, on 23 December 2016 - 12:35 PM, said:
Glandford park was a new ground not so long ago