[Snowflake McBedwetter]

I think it's fairly obvious that Putin is behind this.

Poor old Ashley. No one is safe from the KGB.

[Siberian Spireite]

RGS, on 26 June 2017 - 02:34 PM, said:

From our news team: Director denies sending abusive message

http://www.derbyshir...ssage-1-8616407

Nicely written!

[Spireite-Karl]

Sammy Spireite, on 26 June 2017 - 03:04 PM, said:

the quote from Ashley regarding the fan (AB?) who was fined for abusing him is priceless:

At the time, Mr Carson told the Derbyshire Times: “I hope it serves as a warning to anyone using social media that they will be made responsible for their postings and you should consider the consequences before hitting the send key.”

This is absolutely priceless! Seriously the man (very, very loose sense of the word) has no shame!!

For the love of God, please just clear off from our football club (that's the pair of you btw, not just the Masters pMuppet)

This post has been edited by Spireite-Karl: 26 June 2017 - 04:45 PM

[Wooden Spoon]

KevinArnottsGoldenBoot said:

1498493159[/url]' post='1311387']
I think it's fairly obvious that Putin is behind this.

Poor old Ashley. No one is safe from the KGB.

Carson joins Farrage as "a person of interest"

Damn sure though that Carson wouldn't be a person of interest if I was next to him in pub.....and we were the only people there.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Sammy Spireite, on 26 June 2017 - 03:04 PM, said:

the quote from Ashley regarding the fan (AB?) who was fined for abusing him is priceless:

At the time, Mr Carson told the Derbyshire Times: “I hope it serves as a warning to anyone using social media that they will be made responsible for their postings and you should consider the consequences before hitting the send key.”

The term 'hoist on his own petard' springs instantly to mind...

[Spireite-Karl]

Just typed Ashley Carson into google and the following came up...

Arrogant
Sly
Horrible
Liar
Evasive
Yellow-bellied

Conniving
Appalling
Revolting
Sulky
Odious
Nauseating


EDIT: Oops, wrong thread. Then again is there a wrong thread for this

This post has been edited by Spireite-Karl: 26 June 2017 - 06:48 PM

[Benno Spire]

Sammy Spireite, on 26 June 2017 - 03:04 PM, said:

the quote from Ashley regarding the fan (AB?) who was fined for abusing him is priceless:

At the time, Mr Carson told the Derbyshire Times: “I hope it serves as a warning to anyone using social media that they will be made responsible for their postings and you should consider the consequences before hitting the send key.”

He should have thought of this when he sent the tweet about the Sheffield Utd tickets being priority for the Mansfield game or will he now claim the hacker sent that message as well.

Do the muppets need any extra people?

[Tha Knows...]

peakblue, on 26 June 2017 - 08:41 AM, said:

I want to be reading whats happened in todays emergency board meeting with ashley carson.of course there will be one won't there?

It depends on whether Ashley called one....

[RGS]

Poll on safe standing

http://www.derbyshir...nding-1-8617509

[RGS]

Ex Spireite out to provide goals and leadership

http://www.derbyshir...reton-1-8616703

[dim view]

RGS, on 27 June 2017 - 09:34 AM, said:

Ex Spireite out to provide goals and leadership

http://www.derbyshir...reton-1-8616703

morning Graham
Can you please ask Caldwell if he cannot make any further signings unless somebody leaves or we get a windfall?

[Siberian Spireite]

RGS, on 27 June 2017 - 09:34 AM, said:

Ex Spireite out to provide goals and leadership

http://www.derbyshir...reton-1-8616703

'Leadership' is about the last word I would associate with Craig Westcarr.

[RGS]

Higher expectations for defender after signing new deal


http://www.derbyshir...-deal-1-8617806

[RGS]

The club's view on safe standing


http://www.derbyshir...roact-1-8618728

[RGS]

COLUMN: On the David Brooks saga

http://www.derbyshir...-saga-1-8619431

[Siberian Spireite]

RGS, on 28 June 2017 - 09:23 AM, said:

COLUMN: On the David Brooks saga

http://www.derbyshir...-saga-1-8619431

I disagree. Town can be blamed. The Brooks loan deal was advertised as part of the Evans deal. Nothing to stop them having had it signed and sealed as part of that. At that moment the Blades wanted Evans enough, presumably to head off any potential legal suits over his loss of earnings.

[RGS]

Siberian Spireite, on 28 June 2017 - 09:30 AM, said:

I disagree. Town can be blamed. The Brooks loan deal was advertised as part of the Evans deal. Nothing to stop them having had it signed and sealed as part of that. At that moment the Blades wanted Evans enough, presumably to head off any potential legal suits over his loss of earnings.

My understanding is that Evans deal was done and dusted before Brooks ever came into the equation. Happy to be corrected if anyone can prove otherwise.

[dim view]

Siberian Spireite, on 28 June 2017 - 09:30 AM, said:

I disagree. Town can be blamed. The Brooks loan deal was advertised as part of the Evans deal. Nothing to stop them having had it signed and sealed as part of that. At that moment the Blades wanted Evans enough, presumably to head off any potential legal suits over his loss of earnings.

You are Ashley and/or Caldwell......If it had all been signed and sealed but the lad said he had made a mistake and his heart was not in it after getting back from the tournament, would you have insisted he still came? Course not.

[Siberian Spireite]

dim view, on 28 June 2017 - 09:38 AM, said:

You are Ashley and/or Caldwell......If it had all been signed and sealed but the lad said he had made a mistake and his heart was not in it after getting back from the tournament, would you have insisted he still came? Course not.

'Heart not being in it' didn't seem to stop us signing any of those lads in January.

[SpireiteFitzy]

Siberian Spireite, on 28 June 2017 - 09:30 AM, said:

I disagree. Town can be blamed. The Brooks loan deal was advertised as part of the Evans deal. Nothing to stop them having had it signed and sealed as part of that. At that moment the Blades wanted Evans enough, presumably to head off any potential legal suits over his loss of earnings.

Agreed. The club are just as much at fault here. They came out and said they wanted the transfer dealing done and dusted quickly. So why then do we go for a player who's team aren't ready to sign paper work to let him come here? And honestly, did no one at the club think it suspicious that United were stalling until after an international tournament? We are a small club in a poor league, and it was fairly obvious that if he had a half decent tournament there was no way they were going to loan him here, but no we played the small obedient lapdog to them and ended up losing out. We should have demanded they reciprocate the paperwork or just moved on to the next target, our club is the one that matters, now we've lost a lot of time in which decent replacements may have already gone elsewhere and hurt our own chances.