How Should Saunders Be Judged?
#1
Posted 12 October 2015 - 05:48 PM
I have also read plenty on here saying his football is poor, his recruitment is poor and he shouldn't be after dinner speaking etc etc
We have had enough games to form opinions I reckon so how should we judge him?
It is probably unfair to judge him based on a direct comparison with Paul Cook, Cook's football was excellent in the main, the players clicked and we got to the play offs (still had a few poor runs under Cook)
However, I do not think it is right to simply blame the board and exonerate Saunders of any responsibility for our current situation.
Saunders must have known certain players were off when he took the job, he had all summer to get replacements and has had time after each departure to find someone new. He has been backed by the board with a decent budget, now I am not sure I believe it is bigger than last seasons, but SEB, Novak, Angel, Herd, O'Neil did not come in for nothing and will all be on a decent wage.
Saunders has gone away totally from trying to find gems from the leagues below or young and hungry players from the league above (only O'Neil could fit that category and he has not pulled up many trees) and started to try and sign 'names' such as SEB and Herd - now Cook did this when needed, Roberts and Ryan were established league players when we signed them.
Saunders may have been unlucky with injuries to Novak and Angel, who are possibly his best two signings so far, but the fact remains that he had the summer to do something about replacing the players who left and did very little, and now it is plain as day what effect that has had on the team
We are now relying on players such as Gardner and O'Shea who were never really 'key' players under Cook and are having to blood youth such as Simons and Mani in the hope they offer us some sort of goal threat!
Saunders talks about possession against Gillingham, this means nothing if there is no threat to the opposition!
I wanted to give Saunders time and hope he can turn it around as I do not think Allen will sack him, but the style of play, the squad and Saunders interviews do not fill me with confidence - and I feel the blame for our current form should be mainly at Saunders door!
Couldn't care less what he does in his time off mind, if he wants to do 5 after dinner speaking gigs a week, who cares - I just care about how he gets the team playing
Similarly, I couldn't have cared less what Cook got up to out of business hours, he got a team to play well and delivered exciting, winning football - which is what it is all about at the end of the day
#2
Posted 12 October 2015 - 06:13 PM
We need to be signing up and coming players in the clucas mould from now on.
#3
Posted 12 October 2015 - 06:23 PM
So far he's failed with almost everything he's done. In some respects it was a tough gig but he took it knowing what had gone before and how his squad was likely to be weakened through sales.
I'm not normally negative but much as I'd love to see sparks of light in what DS says and does I'm failing to find any.
#4
Posted 12 October 2015 - 06:36 PM
We all earn our money in different ways but we all spend our money inside that ground one thing or another and yet were being disrespected by the powers that be. What ever direction we're going in lets do it together. If we need to take a step back to take two forward then so be it but stop treating us like bl**dy kids because when all is said & done everything that is being done at that club is for the supporters so we keep spending our money but if we're being disrespected constantly like we are then it won't be long before the incomings are going to be greatly reduced.
It's time the powers that be woke up.

#7
Posted 12 October 2015 - 06:46 PM
Westbars Spireite, on 12 October 2015 - 06:23 PM, said:
He has also admitted that he needs 2 more players. The more time that elapses between him saying it and them arriving, the more folk will think there's summat up.
#8
Posted 12 October 2015 - 06:46 PM
metallilad, on 12 October 2015 - 06:36 PM, said:
We all earn our money in different ways but we all spend our money inside that ground one thing or another and yet were being disrespected by the powers that be. What ever direction we're going in lets do it together. If we need to take a step back to take two forward then so be it but stop treating us like bl**dy kids because when all is said & done everything that is being done at that club is for the supporters so we keep spending our money but if we're being disrespected constantly like we are then it won't be long before the incomings are going to be greatly reduced.
It's time the powers that be woke up.

You could ask him at the Q&A bit of his after dinner speech the night before Fleetwood away ;-)
#9
Posted 12 October 2015 - 06:51 PM
Goku, on 12 October 2015 - 06:43 PM, said:
If I was his judge then I would place a black cloth on the top of my head. He has no redeeming evidence to save him. Got to go!
#10
Posted 12 October 2015 - 07:01 PM
Cartman, on 12 October 2015 - 05:48 PM, said:
I have also read plenty on here saying his football is poor, his recruitment is poor and he shouldn't be after dinner speaking etc etc
We have had enough games to form opinions I reckon so how should we judge him?
It is probably unfair to judge him based on a direct comparison with Paul Cook, Cook's football was excellent in the main, the players clicked and we got to the play offs (still had a few poor runs under Cook)
However, I do not think it is right to simply blame the board and exonerate Saunders of any responsibility for our current situation.
Saunders must have known certain players were off when he took the job, he had all summer to get replacements and has had time after each departure to find someone new. He has been backed by the board with a decent budget, now I am not sure I believe it is bigger than last seasons, but SEB, Novak, Angel, Herd, O'Neil did not come in for nothing and will all be on a decent wage.
Saunders has gone away totally from trying to find gems from the leagues below or young and hungry players from the league above (only O'Neil could fit that category and he has not pulled up many trees) and started to try and sign 'names' such as SEB and Herd - now Cook did this when needed, Roberts and Ryan were established league players when we signed them.
Saunders may have been unlucky with injuries to Novak and Angel, who are possibly his best two signings so far, but the fact remains that he had the summer to do something about replacing the players who left and did very little, and now it is plain as day what effect that has had on the team
We are now relying on players such as Gardner and O'Shea who were never really 'key' players under Cook and are having to blood youth such as Simons and Mani in the hope they offer us some sort of goal threat!
Saunders talks about possession against Gillingham, this means nothing if there is no threat to the opposition!
I wanted to give Saunders time and hope he can turn it around as I do not think Allen will sack him, but the style of play, the squad and Saunders interviews do not fill me with confidence - and I feel the blame for our current form should be mainly at Saunders door!
Couldn't care less what he does in his time off mind, if he wants to do 5 after dinner speaking gigs a week, who cares - I just care about how he gets the team playing
Similarly, I couldn't have cared less what Cook got up to out of business hours, he got a team to play well and delivered exciting, winning football - which is what it is all about at the end of the day
How would I judge him? Nice bloke. Boring bloke. Yes man. Inept clueless manager. So he ticks all our inept, clueless, boring and unambitious CEO's and Chairmans boxes
SAVE A LIFE
#11
Posted 12 October 2015 - 07:08 PM
#12
Posted 12 October 2015 - 08:00 PM
Goku, on 12 October 2015 - 06:43 PM, said:
Well that is a surprise, unlike you

#13
Posted 12 October 2015 - 08:03 PM
listen up, he's told you all, that's how long it takes to judge a new manager
#14
Posted 12 October 2015 - 08:18 PM
Quote
Of course, it could be that Saunders identified different transfer targets and they wouldn't (for whatever reason) come.
Baz
This post has been edited by Brimington Barry: 12 October 2015 - 08:18 PM
#15
Posted 12 October 2015 - 08:45 PM
#16
Posted 12 October 2015 - 09:48 PM
#17
Posted 13 October 2015 - 06:26 AM
azul, on 12 October 2015 - 08:03 PM, said:
listen up, he's told you all, that's how long it takes to judge a new manager
Isn't that what Brendan Rodgers said?

To answer the OP, I'd be looking at (in no particular order):
* Results
* Standard of individual play - he said he would add "more tools in the box" to players - has he? That's a reflection on his ability as a coach & manager.
* Standard of team play - he said we would be able to play well and win in a number of different ways - are we? That's a reflection on his ability as a coach & manager.
* His consistency and objectivity in post-game analysis - "keep doing what we're doing/we need to change/we have good players here/we need more players/players aren't good enough". That's a reflection on his ability as a coach & manager.
* The ability to pull a team together and move forward. That's a reflection on his ability as a coach & manager.
#18
Posted 13 October 2015 - 07:11 AM
Brimington Barry, on 12 October 2015 - 08:18 PM, said:
Baz
Or it could be that Saunders had little room to manoeuvre due to lack of funding from the board and that the alleged budget was just another piece of spin.If you are limited to how many players you can bring in then the only option is to give contracts to the likes of Armand and Banks just to fill out the squad
This post has been edited by Rodney's Moustache: 13 October 2015 - 07:24 AM
#19
Posted 13 October 2015 - 10:18 AM
That's my almighty judgement. A few more games of gutless, brainless, tactically inept tripe and I'll want him gone (though I know it won't happen for a while). But not quite yet.
#20
Posted 13 October 2015 - 10:28 AM
Instead he seems to have been set on because he was (quote) "a nice bloke to have a drink with"